Boundaries between familial Mediterranean fever and juvenile spondyloarthritis: Analysis of three French retrospective cohorts.

Children with Familial Mediterranean fever may suffer from musculoskeletal involvement, somewhat difficult to distinguish from juvenile spondyloarthritis. The association of these two diseases has been scarcely reported in children. Objective of this work was to define the association of familial Mediterranean fever and juvenile spondyloarthritis in France. Three cohorts of children with familial Mediterranean fever, juvenile spondyloarthritis, familial Mediterranean fever related juvenile spondyloarthritis, were retrospectively identified in the French reference center of auto-inflammatory diseases. Familial Mediterranean fever was defined according to Tel-Hashomer or Turkish pediatric criteria with at least one exon-10 MEFV-gene mutation. Juvenile spondyloarthritis was defined according to ILAR criteria. Patients with familial Mediterranean fever or juvenile spondyloarthritis were respectively compared to familial Mediterranean fever related juvenile spondyloarthritis patients. Sixteen children were identified as having familial Mediterranean fever related juvenile spondyloarthritis. The male/female-ratio was 0.6, with median age at spondyloarthritis onset of 7.5years (3-16years). All carried at least one M694V variant in MEFV gene; 16.7% were HLA-B27-carriers. Compared to 83 familial Mediterranean fever patients, familial Mediterranean fever related juvenile spondyloarthritis patients had less frequently fever (P<0.01) and more frequently arthritis (P<0.05), enthesitis (P<0.001), inflammatory back pain (P<0.001), inadequate response to colchicine (P<0.05). Compared to 20 juvenile spondyloarthritis patients, familial Mediterranean fever related juvenile spondyloarthritis patients less often received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P<0.01) and anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (P<0.001). Familial Mediterranean fever may be associated with typical pattern of juvenile spondyloarthritis. These patients, with less response to colchicine, should be diagnosed earlier and treated as for jSpA

Criteria Associated with Treatment Decisions in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis with a Focus on Ultrasonography: Results from the JIRECHO Cohort.

The treatment of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to prevent disability is a major challenge in paediatric rheumatology. The presence of synovitis, which is difficult to detect in children, is associated with structural damage. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) can be used in patients with JIA to reveal subclinical synovitis. The primary aim was to determine whether the use of MSUS was associated with therapeutic modification in patients with JIA. The secondary aim was to identify other factors associated with therapeutic decisions. We conducted an observational study based on the JIRECHO multi-centre cohort, which was developed to provide a systematic MSUS follow-up for patients with JIA. Follow-up occurred every 6 months and included clinical and MSUS examinations. We included children who underwent MSUS of the elbows, wrists, second metacarpophalangeal joints, knees and ankles, which was performed by expert sonographers. Clinical and biological data, disease activity scores and information on therapeutics were collected. A total of 185 visits concerning 112 patients were recorded. Three groups were defined according to the therapeutic decision: escalation (22%, n = 40), de-escalation (14%, n = 26) or stable (64%, n = 119). In the "therapeutic escalation" group: the presence of ultrasonographic synovitis in B-mode and the presence of grade 2 or 3 synovitis in B-mode were not significantly more frequent than in the "stable therapeutic or de-escalation" group (80% versus 65%, p = 0.06; 33% versus 19%, p = 0.06), and the patient's and physician's visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, the clinical JADAS and the C-reactive protein level were significantly higher, but only physician's VAS score remained in the model of logistic regression. In the "therapeutic de-escalation" group: there was no difference in the presence of US synovitis compared with the "stable therapeutic or escalation" group (62% versus 69%, p = 0.48). Even though US synovitis tended to be more frequent in patients with therapeutic escalation, the study did not show that the presence of synovitis in MSUS was statistically associated with therapeutic modifications in patients with JIA. Treatment remained stable despite the presence of US synovitis

Place de la radiographie standard dans l’arthrite juvénile idiopathique: recommandations conjointes des sociétés françaises de rhumatologie, de radiologie, de la société francophone de rhumatologie et de médecine interne pédiatrique

International audienc

The impact of the Eurofever criteria and the new Infevers MEFV classification in real life: results from a large international FMF cohort

Introduction. A classification of genetic variants’ pathogenicity associated to hereditary recurrent fevers and the novel Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria (EPCC) have been recently developed. Objectives: to evaluate the clinical impact of EPCC criteria and new INSAID pathogenicity classification of MEFV variants in the large international Eurofever FMF cohort. Methods: baseline demographic, genetic and clinical data of FMF patients included in the Eurofever registry were analysed. Genetic and clinical EPCC criteria for FMF were applied. MEFV variants were classified according to the new INSAID classification. Results: Since November 2009, clinical information was available for 1012 FMF (532 males/480 females, 827 children/185 adults) from 119 centres. For 125 patients clinical and genetic data mandatory for the application of EPCC were missing. Among the 887 remaining patients 623 (70.2%) satisfied EPCC (EPPC+), while 264 (29.8%) did not (EPPC-). Most of the EPCC- patients (172, 65.1%) displayed negative or non-informative genetics (monoallelic or biallelic benign variants, monoallelic variant of unknown significance. At baseline, Colchicine was used in most of EPCC+ patients (88%) and in a minor percentage of EPCC- patients (69 %, p < 0.0001), who were treated in a higher proportion with steroid or NSAID on demand (p = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively). Anti-IL-1 treatment was used in 4% of patients. Conclusions: The combination of EPCC and the new classification of genetic variants’ pathogenicity captured the majority of FMF patients in the Eurofever cohort in a homogeneous group. EPPC- patients were characterized by a different phenotype and therapeutic approach