miR-21: an oncomir on strike in prostate cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Aberrant expression of microRNAs, small non-coding RNA molecules that post-transcriptionally repress gene expression, seems to be causatively linked to the pathogenesis of cancer. In this context, miR-21 was found to be overexpressed in different human cancers (e.g. glioblastoma, breast cancer). In addition, it is thought to be endowed with oncogenic properties due to its ability to negatively modulate the expression of tumor-suppressor genes (e.g. <it>PTEN</it>) and to cause the reversion of malignant phenotype when knocked- down in several tumor models. On the basis of these findings, miR-21 has been proposed as a widely exploitable cancer-related target. However, scanty information is available concerning the relevance of miR-21 for prostate cancer. In the present study, we investigated the role of miR-21 and its potential as a therapeutic target in two prostate cancer cell lines, characterized by different miR-21 expression levels and <it>PTEN </it>gene status.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We provide evidence that miR-21 knockdown in prostate cancer cells is not sufficient <it>per se </it>i) to affect the proliferative and invasive potential or the chemo- and radiosensitivity profiles or ii) to modulate the expression of the tumor-suppressors PTEN and Pdcd4, which in other tumor types were found to be regulated by miR-21. We also show that miR-21 is not differently expressed in carcinomas and matched normal tissues obtained from 36 untreated prostate cancer patients subjected to radical prostatectomy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Overall, our data suggest that miR-21 is not a central player in the onset of prostate cancer and that its single hitting is not a valuable therapeutic strategy in the disease. This supports the notion that the oncogenic properties of miR-21 could be cell and tissue dependent and that the potential role of a given miRNA as a therapeutic target should be contextualized with respect to the disease.</p

Sinusoidal 50 Hz magnetic fields do not affect structural morphology and proliferation of human cells in vitro

The effects of electromagnetic fields on severa1 processes related to cell physiology and proliferation are currently being investigated. Although the results are still not conclusive and even conflicting, there seems to be a fairly good agreement on the early effects of electromagnetic fields on the generation of free radicals and on Ca++-intracellular concentration and transport. To evaluate the long-lasting consequences of these precocious events, we examined the effects of short- and long-term magnetic field exposure on structural organization (cytokeratin or actin detection), proliferation (bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and propidium iodide staining), colony forming ability and viability (trypan blue exclusion test) of highly proliferating MCF-7 cells (from human breast carcinoma) and on slowly proliferating normal human fibroblasts (from healthy donors). Cells were exposed to either 20 or 500 μT sinusoidally oscillating (50Hz) magnetic fields for different lengths of time (1 to 4 days). Short (1 day)- and long (4 days)-time exposure to the two intensities did not affect MCF-7 growth and viability, colony number and size, or cellular distribution along the cell cycle; neither were the cell morphology and the intracellular distribution and amount of cytokeratin modified. Similarly, no modifications in the actin distribution and proliferative potential were observed in normal human fibroblasts. These findings suggest that under our experimental conditions, continuous exposure to magnetic fields does not result in any appreciable effect in both normal and tumor cells in vitro

Not only cancer: the long non-coding RNA MALAT1 affects the repertoire of alternatively spliced transcripts and circular RNAs in multiple sclerosis

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are post-transcriptional and epigenetic regulators, whose implication in neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases remains poorly understood. We analyzed publicly available microarray data sets to identify dysregulated lncRNAs in multiple sclerosis (MS), a neuroinflammatory autoimmune disease. We found a consistent upregulation in MS of the lncRNA MALAT1 (2.7-fold increase; meta-analysis, P = 1.3 × 10-8; 190 cases, 182 controls), known to regulate alternative splicing (AS). We confirmed MALAT1 upregulation in two independent MS cohorts (1.5-fold increase; P \u3c 0.01; 59 cases, 50 controls). We hence performed MALAT1 overexpression/knockdown in cell lines, demonstrating that its modulation impacts on endogenous expression of splicing factors (HNRNPF and HNRNPH1) and on AS of MS-associated genes (IL7R and SP140). Minigene-based splicing assays upon MALAT1 modulation recapitulated IL7R and SP140 isoform unbalances observed in patients. RNA-sequencing of MALAT1-knockdown Jurkat cells further highlighted MALAT1 role in splicing (approximately 1100 significantly-modulated AS events) and revealed its contribution to backsplicing (approximately 50 differentially expressed circular RNAs). Our study proposes a possible novel role for MALAT1 dysregulation and the consequent AS alteration in MS pathogenesis, based on anomalous splicing/backsplicing profiles of MS-relevant genes

Development of Resistance to the Atypical Retinoid, ST1926, in the Lung Carcinoma Cell Line H460 Is Associated with Reduced Formation of DNA Strand Breaks and a Defective DNA Damage Response

Atypical retinoids are potent inducers of apoptosis, but activation of the apoptotic pathway seems to be independent of retinoid receptors. Previous studies with a novel adamantyl retinoid, ST1926, have shown that apoptosis induction is associated with an early genotoxic stress. To better understand the relevance of these events, we have selected a subline of the H460 lung carcinoma cell line resistant to ST1926. Resistant cells exhibited cross-resistance to a related molecule, CD437, but not cross-resistance to agents with different mechanisms of action. In spite of a lack of defects in intracellular drug accumulation, induction of DNA strand breaks in resistant cells required exposure to a substantially higher concentration, which was consistent with the degree of resistance. At drug concentrations causing a similar antiproliferative effect (IC(80)) and a comparable extent of DNA lesions in sensitive and resistant cells, the apoptotic response was a delayed and less marked event in resistant cells, thus indicating a reduced susceptibility to apoptosis. In spite of recognition of DNA lesions in resistant cells, as supported by phosphorylation of p53 and histone H2AX, resistant cells exhibited no activation of the mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis. Following exposure to equitoxic drug concentrations, only sensitive cells exhibited a typical stress/DNA damage response, with activation of the S-phase checkpoint. The cellular resistance to ST1926 reflects alterations responsible for a reduced generation of DNA lesions and for an enhanced tolerance of the genotoxic stress, resulting in lack of activation of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. The defective DNA damage response, accompanied by a reduced susceptibility to apoptosis in resistant cells, provides further support to the involvement of genotoxic stress as a critical event in mediating apoptosis induction by ST1926