HRLT: A high-resolution (1 day, 1 km) and long-term (1961–2019) gridded dataset for temperature and precipitation across China

Accurate long-term temperature and precipitation estimates at high spatial and temporal resolutions are vital for a wide variety of climatological studies. We have produced a new, publicly available, daily, gridded maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation dataset for China with a high spatial resolution of 1 km and over a long-term period (1961 to 2019). It has been named the HRLT. The daily gridded data were interpolated using comprehensive statistical analyses, which included machine learning, the generalized additive model, and thin plate splines. It is based on the 0.5° × 0.5° grid dataset from the China Meteorological Administration, together with covariates for elevation, aspect, slope, topographic wetness index, latitude, and longitude. The accuracy of the HRLT daily dataset was assessed using observation data from meteorological stations. The maximum and minimum temperature estimates were more accurate than the precipitation estimates. For maximum temperature, the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's correlation coefficient (Cor), coefficient of determination after adjustment (R²), and Nash-Sutcliffe modeling efficiency (NSE) were 1.07 °C, 1.62 °C 0.99, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively. For minimum temperature, the MAE, RMSE, Cor, R², and NSE were 1.08°C, 1.53 °C, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. For precipitation, the MAE, RMSE, Cor, R², and NSE were 1.30 mm, 4.78 mm, 0.84, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively. The accuracy of the HRLT was compared to those of the other three existing datasets and its accuracy was either greater than the others, especially for precipitation, or comparable in accuracy, but with higher spatial resolution and over a longer time period. In summary, the HRLT dataset, which has a high spatial resolution, covers a longer period of time and has reliable accuracy, is suitable for future environmental analyses, especially the effects of extreme weather

HRLT: A high-resolution (1 day, 1 km) and long-term (1961–2019) gridded dataset for temperature and precipitation across China

Accurate long-term temperature and precipitation estimates at high spatial and temporal resolutions are vital for a wide variety of climatological studies. We have produced a new, publicly available, daily, gridded maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation dataset for China with a high spatial resolution of 1 km and over a long-term period (1961 to 2019). It has been named the HRLT. The daily gridded data were interpolated using comprehensive statistical analyses, which included machine learning, the generalized additive model, and thin plate splines. It is based on the 0.5° × 0.5° grid dataset from the China Meteorological Administration, together with covariates for elevation, aspect, slope, topographic wetness index, latitude, and longitude. The accuracy of the HRLT daily dataset was assessed using meteorological station observation data. The maximum and minimum temperature estimates were more accurate than the precipitation estimates. For maximum temperature, the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's correlation coefficient (Cor), coefficient of determination after adjustment (R^2), and Nash-Sutcliffe modeling efficiency (NSE) were 1.07 ℃, 1.62 ℃, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively. For minimum temperature, the MAE, RMSE, Cor, R^2, and NSE were 1.08 ℃, 1.53 ℃, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. For precipitation, the MAE, RMSE, Cor, R^2, and NSE were 1.30 mm, 4.78 mm, 0.84, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively. The accuracy of the HRLT was compared to those of the other two existing datasets and its accuracy was either greater than the others, especially for precipitation, or comparable in accuracy, but with higher spatial resolution and over a longer time period. In summary, the HRLT dataset, which has a high spatial resolution, covers a longer period of time and has reliable accuracy, is suitable for future environmental analyses, especially the effects of extreme weather

Annual average temperature (maximum temperature and minimum temperature) and annual accumulated precipitation across China from 1961-2019

The annual datasets as "teaser data", can make it much more easy for potential users to have a brief look at daily datasets. The datasets are annual average temperature (maximum temperature and minimum temperature) and annual accumulated precipitation with 1 km spatial resolution over 1961-2019, and are calculated from the daily, gridded maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation dataset for China (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.941329)

Soil warming decreases carbon availability and reduces metabolic functions of bacteria

http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of Chinahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012226 Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitieshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012528 Kazan Federal Universityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013804 Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitieshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100018647 RUDN Universityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005595 University of Californi

Can Machine Learning Algorithms Successfully Predict Grassland Aboveground Biomass?

The timely and accurate estimation of grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) is important. Machine learning (ML) has been widely used in the past few decades to deal with complex relationships. In this study, based on an 11-year period (2005–2015) of AGB data (1620 valid AGB measurements) on the Three-River Headwaters Region (TRHR), combined with remote sensing data, weather data, terrain data, and soil data, we compared the predictive performance of a linear statistical method, machine learning (ML) methods, and evaluated their temporal and spatial scalability. The results show that machine learning can predict grassland biomass well, and the existence of an independent validation set can help us better understand the prediction performance of the model. Our findings show the following: (1) The random forest (RF) based on variables obtained through stepwise regression analysis (SRA) was the best model (R2vad = 0.60, RMSEvad = 1245.85 kg DW (dry matter weight)/ha, AIC = 5583.51, and BIC = 5631.10). It also had the best predictive capability of years with unknown areas (R2indep = 0.50, RMSEindep = 1332.59 kg DW/ha). (2) Variable screening improved the accuracy of all of the models. (3) All models’ predictive accuracy varied between 0.45 and 0.60, and the RMSE values were lower than 1457.26 kg DW/ha, indicating that the results were reliably accurate

Can Machine Learning Algorithms Successfully Predict Grassland Aboveground Biomass?

The timely and accurate estimation of grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) is important. Machine learning (ML) has been widely used in the past few decades to deal with complex relationships. In this study, based on an 11-year period (2005–2015) of AGB data (1620 valid AGB measurements) on the Three-River Headwaters Region (TRHR), combined with remote sensing data, weather data, terrain data, and soil data, we compared the predictive performance of a linear statistical method, machine learning (ML) methods, and evaluated their temporal and spatial scalability. The results show that machine learning can predict grassland biomass well, and the existence of an independent validation set can help us better understand the prediction performance of the model. Our findings show the following: (1) The random forest (RF) based on variables obtained through stepwise regression analysis (SRA) was the best model (R2vad = 0.60, RMSEvad = 1245.85 kg DW (dry matter weight)/ha, AIC = 5583.51, and BIC = 5631.10). It also had the best predictive capability of years with unknown areas (R2indep = 0.50, RMSEindep = 1332.59 kg DW/ha). (2) Variable screening improved the accuracy of all of the models. (3) All models’ predictive accuracy varied between 0.45 and 0.60, and the RMSE values were lower than 1457.26 kg DW/ha, indicating that the results were reliably accurate