Total number of mosquitoes, model estimated means (MEM) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of HLC collections performed 20 m apart from all experimental pens as well as sporozoite rates (SR) and entomological inoculation rates (EIR).

1<p>Model estimated mean.</p>2<p>Daily EIR – number of infected bites per person per night.</p>3<p>Reference Pen is A – no net and occupied by two zebu bulls.</p

Experimental animal enclosure at Boadi Cattle Research Farm, KNUST.

<p>Experimental animal enclosure at Boadi Cattle Research Farm, KNUST.</p

Additional file 2: Table S2. of Host-feeding patterns of mosquito species in Germany

Kruskal-Wallis tests on the differences of the percentages of detected birds, non-human mammals and humans between the three land use classes (natural, rural and urban) for the three most frequent mosquito species (Fig. 3). (DOCX 14 kb

Percentage of active <i>Aedes aegypti</i> following 10 seconds exposure to the treated net samples collected from the field after 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 6 hours and 24 hours.

<p>Percentage of active <i>Aedes aegypti</i> following 10 seconds exposure to the treated net samples collected from the field after 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 6 hours and 24 hours.</p

Total number of mosquitoes, model estimated means (MEM) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of HLC collections performed inside all experimental pens as well as sporozoite rates (SR) and entomological inoculation rates (EIR).

1<p>Model estimated mean.</p>2<p>Daily EIR – number of infected bites per person per night.</p>3<p>Reference Pen is A – no net and occupied by two zebu bulls.</p

Additional file 3: Table S3. of Host-feeding patterns of mosquito species in Germany

Chi-square tests on the differences in the frequencies of detected mammalian or avian hosts among all pairs of used trapping methods with adjusted P-values for multiple comparisons. (DOCX 13 kb