17 research outputs found
Bland Altman plot comparing S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX_fem to S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA derived from measurements with <i>femoral</i> CVC.
<p>S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX_fem: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.</p
Univariate association of different variables to S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and the amount |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>|.
<p>Univariate association of different variables to S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and the amount |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>|.</p
Experimental and clinical studies on the use of CeVOX.
<p>Experimental and clinical studies on the use of CeVOX.</p
Correlation of the amount of the bias |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| with a prediction formula derived from the total datset (n = 120).
<p>S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.</p
Bland Altman plot comparing S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX_jug to S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA derived from measurements with <i>jugular</i> CVC.
<p>S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX_jug: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.</p
Bland Altman plot comparing S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX to S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA derived from all measurements (jugular or femoral CVC).
<p>S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.</p
ROC curve comparing different predictors of |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA| ≥5% in the independent <i>validation</i> group (n = 40).
<p>Prediction of |bias|: model predicting |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA| which was derived from multiple regression analysis within the <i>evaluation</i> group. ROC: receiver operating characteristic. AUC: area under the curve. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.</p
ROC curve comparing different predictors of |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA| ≥5% in the <i>evaluation</i> group (n = 80).
<p>“Prediction of |bias|”: model predicting |S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX–S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA| which was derived from multiple regression analysis within the evaluation group. ROC: receiver operating characteristic. AUC: area under the curve. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. S<sub>cv</sub>O<sub>2</sub>_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.</p
Comparison of pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI and global ejection fraction GEF derived from jugular and femoral indicator injection using the PiCCO-2 device: A prospective observational study - Fig 1
<p><b>1A-1F:</b> Bland Altman plots comparing (1A) pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI_fem_uncor derived from femoral injection without activating of a potential correction by the device to the gold standard measurement PVPI_jug using a jugular CVC for indicator injection, <b>(1B)</b> pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI_fem_cor derived from femoral injection after activiation of a potential correction by the device to the gold standard measurement PVPI_jug using a jugular CVC for indicator injection, <b>(1C)</b> pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI derived from femoral indicator injection with (PVPI_fem_cor) and without (PVPI_fem_uncor) activation of a potential correction by the device, <b>(1D)</b> pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI derived jugular indicator injection PVPI_jug to PVPI-fem_uncor_form which was derived from femoral indicator injection without activation of a potential correction by the device, but correction based on the formula suggested for correction of femoral indicator injection derived GEDVI: GEDVI<sub>corrected</sub> [mL / m<sup>2</sup>] = 0.539 * GEDVI<sub>uncorrected</sub>—15.17 + 24.49 * CI<sub>uncorrected</sub> 2.311* BW<sub>ideal.</sub> PVPI_fem_uncor_form was calculated by multiplying PVPI_fem_uncor with the ratio 0.25*GEDV<sub>uncorrected</sub>/0.25*GEDV<sub>corrected</sub>, <b>(1E)</b> global ejection fraction GEF_fem_uncor derived from femoral injection without activating of a potential correction by the device to the gold standard measurement GEF_jug using a jugular CVC for indicator injection, <b>(1F)</b> global ejection fraction GEF_fem_cor derived from femoral injection after activiation of a potential correction by the device to the gold standard measurement GEF_jug using a jugular CVC for indicator injection, <b>(1G)</b> global ejection fraction GEF derived from femoral indicator injection with (GEF_fem_cor) and without (GEF_fem_uncor) activation of a potential correction by the device.</p