Teaching Cultural Competency through Global Health Education at Weill Cornell Medicine

Background: Educating medical students to better understand the complexities of cultural competence, the social determinants and environmental determinants of health that are important and integral components of the medical school curriculum. Methods: In 2014, Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) implemented a new curriculum, the adoption of which provided the means to enhance an existing global health program, informally introduced in 2009, and to address the issues of cultural competency. In this article, we share WCM’s experience in building and expanding its global health curriculum. Results: A hallmark of our program is the successful collaboration between students and faculty to create a multi-disciplinary global health program that incorporates electives, clinical field placement, and collaborative research. Conclusion: Key lessons learned through our experience include the necessity for strong faculty-student collaboration, full support from the administration, and building global partnerships. Our example could be a useful guide for other medical schools seeking to establish a global health education curriculum.&nbsp

Choices and Outcomes of the Oldest Old Admitted During the First Wave of COVID-19 in New York City.

Objectives: Morbidity and mortality are higher in older adults with COVID-19, but their decisions about aggressive care, severity of disease, and outcomes during the first surge in New York City are not well characterized. We sought to determine if the oldest patients chose intubation and comfort care at different rates compared to younger geriatric patients. We also studied outcomes among patients admitted with severe disease and those who chose aggressive versus comfort care. Methods: This retrospective analysis used electronic health record data from patients 65 years and older at two medical centers in New York City admitted between 3/5/2020 and 5/15/2020. The primary outcome was comfort care orders, and secondary outcomes included death, palliative care consultation, goals of care discussion, code status, and ventilator weaning. Results: Of the 854 patients, 214 were in the oldest old (OO, age > = 85) group, 269 middle old (MO, age 75-84), and 371 young old (YO, age 65-74). Among those with serious disease, the OO were more likely to choose comfort care (45% vs. 21% MO and 6.8% YO), less likely to be intubated (17% vs. 37% MO and 44% YO), more likely to have a palliative care consult, more likely to be DNR/DNI on admission (60% vs. 17% MO and 9.3%% YO), and more likely to die during admission (65% vs. 42% MO and 21% YO) (all p-values < 0.001). Of all 216 intubated patients, 78% of the OO died, versus 66% of the MO and 36% of the YO (p = <0.001). Conclusions: Adults 85 and above admitted with COVID-19 were more likely to forego intubation and die with comfort-based care. Irrespective of intubation choice, patients 85 and older had a markedly poorer prognosis than other cohorts over 65