Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases

Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) shows regions of slight hypersensitivity away from retinal regions damaged by diabetes or age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study examines if such results also appear in multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) recorded on the same day in the same patients. The pupil control system receives input from the extra-striate cortex, so we also examined evidence for such input. We recruited subjects with early type 2 diabetes (T2D) with no retinopathy, and patients with unilateral exudative AMD. Population average responses of the diabetes patients, and the normal fellow eyes of AMD patients, showed multiple regions of significant hypersensitivity (p < 0.05) on both mfPOP and mfVEPs. For mfVEPs the occipital electrodes showed fewer hypersensitive regions than the surrounding electrodes. More advanced AMD showed regions of suppression becoming centrally concentrated in the exudative AMD areas. Thus, mfVEP electrodes biased towards extra-striate cortical responses (surround electrodes) appeared to show similar hypersensitive visual field locations to mfPOP in early stage diabetic and AMD damage. Our findings suggest that hypersensitive regions may be a potential biomarker for future development of AMD or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and may be more informative than visual acuity which remains largely undisturbed during early disease

Rapid Objective Testing of Visual Function Matched to the ETDRS Grid and Its Diagnostic Power in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: To study the power of an 80-second multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) test tailored to the ETDRS grid to diagnose age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) severity grade. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Methods: We compared diagnostic power of acuity, ETDRS grid retinal thickness data, new 80-second M18 mfPOP test, and two wider-field 6-minute mfPOP tests (Macular-P131, Widefield-P129). The M18 stimuli match the size and shape of bifurcated ETDRS grid regions, allowing easy structure–function comparisons. M18, P129, and P131 stimuli test both eyes concurrently. We recruited 34 patients with early-stage AMD with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 72.6 ± 7.06 years. The M18 and P129 plus P131 stimuli had 26 and 51 control participants, respectively with mean ± SD ages of 73.1 ± 8.17 years and 72.1 ± 5.83 years, respectively. Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry testing used the Food and Drug Administration-cleared Objective FIELD Analyzer (OFA; Konan Medical USA). Main Outcome Measures: Percentage area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and Hedge's g effect size. Results: Acuity and OCT ETDRS grid thickness and volume produced reasonable diagnostic power (percentage AUC) for AREDS grade 4 eyes at 83.9 ± 9.98% and 90.2 ± 6.32% (mean ± standard error), respectively, but not for eyes with less severe disease. By contrast, M18 stimuli produced percentage AUCs from 72.8 ± 6.65% (AREDS grade 2) to 92.9 ± 3.93% (AREDS grade 4), and 82.9 ± 3.71% for all eyes. Hedge's g effect sizes ranged from 0.84 to 2.32 (large to huge). Percentage AUC for P131 stimuli performed similarly and for P129 performed somewhat less well. Conclusions: The rapid and objective M18 test provided diagnostic power comparable with that of wider-field 6-minute mfPOP tests. Unlike acuity or OCT ETDRS grid data, OFA tests produced reasonable diagnostic power in AREDS grade 1 to 3 eyes.</p

Genome-wide association studies for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are sight threatening complications of diabetes mellitus and leading causes of adult onset blindness worldwide. Genetic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been described previously, but have been difficult to replicate between studies, which have often used composite phenotypes and been conducted in different populations. This study aims to identify genetic risk factors for DME and PDR as separate complications in Australians of European descent with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Caucasian Australians with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in a genome wide association study (GWAS) to compare 270 DME cases and 176 PDR cases with 435 non retinopathy controls. All participants were genotyped by SNP array and after data cleaning, cases were compared to controls using logistic regression adjusting for relevant covariates. Results: The top ranked SNP for DME was rs1990145 (p = 4.10 x 10(-6), OR = 2.02 95%CI [1.50, 2.72]) on chromosome 2. The top-ranked SNP for PDR was rs918519 (p = 3.87 x 10(-6), OR = 0.35 95%CI [0.22, 0.54]) on chromosome 5. A trend towards association was also detected at two SNPs reported in the only other reported GWAS of DR in Caucasians; rs12267418 near MALRD1 (p = 0.008) in the DME cohort and rs16999051 in the diabetes gene PCSK.2 (p = 0.007) in the PDR cohort. Conclusion: This study has identified loci of interest for DME and PDR, two common ocular complications of diabetes. These findings require replication in other Caucasian cohorts with type 2 diabetes and larger cohorts will be required to identify genetic loci with statistical confidence. There is considerable overlap in the patient cohorts with each retinopathy subtype, complicating the search for genes that contribute to PDR and DME biology

Genetic study of Diabetic Retinopathy: recruitment methodology and analysis of baseline characteristics

ARC and NHMRC funded authors may self-archive the author accepted version of their paper (authors manuscript) after a 12-month embargo period from publication in an open access institutional repository.BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a blinding disease of increasing prevalence, caused by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Here we describe the patient recruitment methodology, case and control definitions, and clinical characteristics of a study sample to be used for genome-wide association (GWAS) analysis to detect genetic risk variants of DR. METHODS: 1669 participants with either type 1 (T1) or type 2 (T2) diabetes mellitus (DM) aged 18 to 95 years were recruited in Australian hospital clinics. Individuals with T2DM had disease duration of at least 5 years, and were taking oral hypoglycemic medication, and/or insulin therapy. Participants underwent ophthalmic examination. Medical history and biochemistry results were collected. Venous blood was obtained for genetic analysis. RESULTS: 683 diabetic cases (178 T1DM and 505 T2DM participants) with sight-threatening DR, defined as severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR) or diabetic macular edema (DME) were included in this analysis. 812 individuals with DM but no DR or minimal NPDR were recruited as controls (191 with T1DM and 621 with T2DM). The presence of sight-threatening DR was significantly correlated with DM duration, hypertension, nephropathy, neuropathy, HbA1C and BMI. DME was associated with T2DM (p<0.001), whereas PDR was associated with T1DM (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of a case-control study design involving extremes of the DR phenotype makes this a suitable cohort, for a well-powered GWAS to detect genetic risk variants for DR.This work was funded by a grant from the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia, and Project Grant #595918 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. JEC is supported in part by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship and KPB by a Career Development Fellowship. Research conducted at Moorfields Eye Hospital was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology