Success of blinding a procedural intervention in a randomised controlled trial in preterm infants receiving respiratory support

Background: Blinding of treatment allocation from treating clinicians in neonatal randomised controlled trials can minimise performance bias, but its effectiveness is rarely assessed. // Methods: To examine the effectiveness of blinding a procedural intervention from treating clinicians in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus sham treatment in preterm infants of gestation 25–28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome. The intervention (minimally invasive surfactant therapy or sham) was performed behind a screen within the first 6 h of life by a ‘study team’ uninvolved in clinical care including decision-making. Procedure duration and the study team’s words and actions during the sham treatment mimicked those of the minimally invasive surfactant therapy procedure. Post-intervention, three clinicians completed a questionnaire regarding perceived group allocation, with the responses matched against actual intervention and categorised as correct, incorrect, or unsure. Success of blinding was calculated using validated blinding indices applied to the data overall (James index, successful blinding defined as > 0.50), or to the two treatment allocation groups (Bang index, successful blinding: −0.30 to 0.30). Blinding success was measured within staff role, and the associations between blinding success and procedural duration and oxygenation improvement post-procedure were estimated. // Results: From 1345 questionnaires in relation to a procedural intervention in 485 participants, responses were categorised as correct in 441 (33%), incorrect in 142 (11%), and unsure in 762 (57%), with similar proportions for each of the response categories in the two treatment arms. The James index indicated successful blinding overall 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.70). The Bang index was 0.28 (95% CI 0.23–0.32) in the minimally invasive surfactant therapy group and 0.17 (95% CI 0.12–0.21) in the sham arm. Neonatologists more frequently guessed the correct intervention (47%) than bedside nurses (36%), neonatal trainees (31%), and other nurses (24%). For the minimally invasive surfactant therapy intervention, the Bang index was linearly related to procedural duration and oxygenation improvement post-procedure. No evidence of such relationships was seen in the sham arm. // Conclusion: Blinding of a procedural intervention from clinicians is both achievable and measurable in neonatal randomised controlled trials

Evidence-Based Practice : Improving the Quality of Perinatal Care

BACKGROUND: For clinical research findings to improve the quality of care and outcomes for newborn infants and their families, they need to be implemented in policy and adopted in practice. METHODS: We describe the principles of effective dissemination and implementation of research findings and highlight examples of collaborative quality improvement strategies to ensure that guidelines, protocols, policies and practices reflect research-informed evidence. RESULTS: Passive dissemination of research findings is generally ineffective in driving change. Implementation strategies that use multi-faceted approaches acting on different barriers to change are better at driving improvements in the quality of care practices. These initiatives are increasingly embedded within regional, national and international networks of neonatal care centres that collaborate in conducting research, implementing its findings and auditing its uptake. Examples of successful network-based collaborative quality improvement programmes include efforts to increase use of evidence-based strategies to prevent hospital-acquired bloodstream infections, optimise surfactant replacement for preterm infants, reduce the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, improve antibiotic stewardship and promote the use of human milk to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. CONCLUSIONS: Effective dissemination and implementation are essential for research evidence to improve quality of care and outcomes for newborn infants and their families. Multifaceted initiatives within network-based collaborative quality improvement programmes facilitate continuous audit and benchmarking cycles to ensure equity of access to evidence-based care practices

Practices and Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Registry for Preterm Newborns with Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current treatment practices of preterm infants with early hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) and their association with patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a prospective, observational, multicenter clinical registry of preterm newborns \u3c34 \u3eweeks\u27 gestation with HRF and PH, based on either clinical or echocardiographic evidence during the first 72 hours of life, from 28 neonatal intensive care units in the US from 2017 through 2022. The primary end point was mortality among those who did or did not receive PH-targeted treatment, and the secondary end points included comparisons of major morbidities. Variables were compared using t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Fisher exact tests, and χ² tests. RESULTS: We analyzed the results of 224 preterm infants enrolled in the registry. Of which, 84% (188/224) received PH-targeted treatment, most commonly inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). Early mortality in this cohort was high, as 33% (71/224) of this sample died in the first month of life, and 77% of survivors (105/137) developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Infants who received PH-targeted treatment had higher oxygenation indices at the time of enrollment (28.16 [IQR: 13.94, 42.5] vs 15.46 [IQR: 11.94, 26.15]; P = .0064). Patient outcomes did not differ between those who did or did not receive PH-targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset HRF with PH in preterm infants is associated with a high early mortality and a high risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. iNO is commonly used to treat early-onset PH in preterm infants with HRF. In comparison with untreated infants with lower oxygenation indices, iNO treatment in severe PH may prevent poorer outcomes