18 research outputs found
Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis in field-based studies: a combined clinical and sonographic definition
Ultrasound in schistosomiasis mansoni
We reviewed ultrasound features in patients with schistosomiasis mansoni. The alterations that we observed in acute and hepatosplenic schistosomiasis are described. The advantages and disadvantages of using ultrasound patterns in the evaluation of liver fibrosis are discussed. Other diseases that are important in the differential diagnosis of schistosomal liver fibrosis are presented. Ultrasound is an effective and flexible diagnostic tool in the evaluation of a variety of diseases. It presents no harmful effects to patients, allowing non-invasive studies in hospitalized patients and in other facilities
Febre de origem indeterminada: preceitos, pistas clĂnicas e exames complementares
Dez preceitos, vinte pistas clĂnicas e os exames complementares Ășteis na avaliação inicial dos pacientes com febre de origem indeterminada (FOI) sĂŁo apresentados pelos autores
Salmonella-S. mansoni ASSOCIATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME
Two young men with Salmonella bacteraemia, active schistosomiasis and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are reported. The clinical presentation comprised nonspecific signs and symptoms, such as fatigue, malaise, weight loss, diarrhoea, prolonged fever, and hepatosplenomegaly. In one patient, liver biopsy showed poorly formed granulomata around Schistosoma mansoni eggs and hepatitis. Treatment of schistosomiasis alone induced consistent clinical improvement with eventual cure of both Salmonella and S. mansoni infections. Recognition of the Salmonella-S. mansoni association in patients with AIDS is important because treatment of schistosomiasis makes a difference, improving the prognosis of this otherwise, recurrent, potentially fatal bacteraemia
Splenic palpation for the evaluation of morbidity due to Schistosomiasis mansoni
This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of splenic
palpation for the diagnosis of splenomegaly, and to determine whether
the frequency of individuals with a palpable spleen in an endemic area
can be considered as an index of morbidity of schistosomiasis. For the
clinical diagnosis of splenomegaly, two criteria have been tested: (A)
presence of a palpable spleen and (B) presence of a palpable spleen
whose border could be felt more than 4 cm below the costal margin. In
an area of high prevalence of the disease (66.3%) 285 individuals aged
18 years or more have been submitted to abdominal ultrasonography and
physical examination. Splenomegaly was defined as a splenic length
greater than 120 mm by ultrasound and the sensitivity, specificity,
positive and negative predictive values of criterion A were 72.2%,
90.5%, 35.1% and 97.8%. The values for criterion B were 27.8%, 98%, 50%
and 95%, respectively. In an non endemic area, 517 individuals were
submitted to the same protocol and 22 individuals had a palpable
spleen, but no patient fulfilled criterion B for splenomegaly, and only
one met the ultrasonographic criterion for splenomegaly. The authors
concluded that abdominal palpation is a poor method for the diagnosis
of splenomegaly
Splenic palpation for the evaluation of morbidity due to Schistosomiasis mansoni
This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of splenic
palpation for the diagnosis of splenomegaly, and to determine whether
the frequency of individuals with a palpable spleen in an endemic area
can be considered as an index of morbidity of schistosomiasis. For the
clinical diagnosis of splenomegaly, two criteria have been tested: (A)
presence of a palpable spleen and (B) presence of a palpable spleen
whose border could be felt more than 4 cm below the costal margin. In
an area of high prevalence of the disease (66.3%) 285 individuals aged
18 years or more have been submitted to abdominal ultrasonography and
physical examination. Splenomegaly was defined as a splenic length
greater than 120 mm by ultrasound and the sensitivity, specificity,
positive and negative predictive values of criterion A were 72.2%,
90.5%, 35.1% and 97.8%. The values for criterion B were 27.8%, 98%, 50%
and 95%, respectively. In an non endemic area, 517 individuals were
submitted to the same protocol and 22 individuals had a palpable
spleen, but no patient fulfilled criterion B for splenomegaly, and only
one met the ultrasonographic criterion for splenomegaly. The authors
concluded that abdominal palpation is a poor method for the diagnosis
of splenomegaly