Internet y los derechos de las personas.

The appearance of Internet has brought a substantial debate about the validity ofthe legal theory to explain his regulation. In this context, the concept of subjective right is one ofthe most controversial. Some scholars maintain that subjective right, based on the idea of individual exclusive power, is inaccurate to Internet, because this is a reality formed of information and this can not be possessed exclusively like a material thing. Notwithstanding these thesis are debatable. Subjective right can be conceived in a more flexible form. Furthermore, Internet is not so different: it is not an independent world in need of a new law. From these premises, we can argue that the diversity of rights typical ofthe legal orders appears in Internet too. Among these, the rights directly related with personality, like human rights, are particularly important. But his exercise (partial or total) through the Web does not change the exigibilty of respect and fulfilment

Internet: ¿Hacia un nuevo concepto de lo público?

El desarrollo de Internet parece exigir cambios en el papel del Estado como creador de derecho. Este proceso implica una nueva concepción del espacio público en la que la clave no es el poder, sino las necesidades de la persona; las fuentes de la regulación de Internet dependen de la influencia de esas necesidades en la Red: legislación, tratados internacionales y autorregulación son necesarios para responder a las demandas de esta tecnología.The development of Internet seems to require changes in the role of the State as creator of law. This process implies a new conception of the public space in which the key is not the power, but the necessities of person; the sources of the regulation of Internet depend on the influence of these necessities in the web: legislation, international treatises and autorregulation are needed to answer the demands of this technology

El «medium rei» y el contexto hermenéutico: similitudes y diferencias

Legal Realism is one of the most important branches of the Javier Hervada’s legal philosophy. Among other topics, legal realism mantains that law is, in its deeper sense, the «right thing», obtained from a objective features of a relation of justice. Legal hermeneutics also sustains a conception of law centered in concretion inside multiple contexts. There were simillarities between these theories, but there were also a clear difference: legal realism of thomist roots affirms the existente of evident precepts of natural law. Legal hermeneutics, mantains that human being exists always in a historical situation without objective foundations of metaphysical procedence.El realismo jurídico es una de las partes más importantes de la filosofía jurídica de Javier Hervada. Entre otras nociones, el realismo jurídico mantiene que el derecho es, en su sentido más profundo, la «cosa justa», obtenida desde las características objetivas de una relación de justicia. La hermenéutica jurídica también sostiene una concepción del derecho centrada en la concreción dentro de diversos contextos. Hay similitudes entre estas teorías, pero también hay una diferencia clara: el realismo jurídico de raíces tomistas afirma la existencia de principios evidentes del derecho natural. La hermenéutica jurídica mantiene que el ser humano existe siempre en una situación histórica sin fundamentos objetivos de procedencia metafísica

¿Un capítulo del triunfo del Estado? El primer positivismo jurídico alemán y la centralización del Derecho

Una de las características principales del Estado moderno es el monopolio del derecho. Entre los fundamentos teóricos de ese monopolio, el Positivismo jurídico tiene una posición especial. Habitualmente, los positivistas han sido vistos como autores que identifican el derecho con la voluntad del Estado. Se supone que están interesados sólo en la observación de los hechos acerca del origen del derecho y, consecuentemente, identifican el derecho con el hecho del poder político. La finalidad de este artículo es mostrar las opiniones de algunos juristas alemanes de principios del siglo XIX, considerados positivistas, sobre el monopolio estatal del derecho. Las fuentes muestran que la absorción política no fue admitida por todos esos juristas.One of the main features of modern State is the monopolization of law. And in the theoretical grounds for that, Legal Positivism has a special position. Usually positivists have been seen as authors who identify law with the will of the State. It is assumed that they are interested only in the observation of facts related with the origins of law, and consequently that they identify law with political power as a fact. The aim of this paper is to show the opinion of some early 19th century German lawyers, considered positivists, about the state monopolization of law. And the sources show that political absorption was not admitted by all of those lawyers

The photosynthetic cytochrome c550 from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum

The photosynthetic cytochrome c550 from the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum has been purified and characterized. Cytochrome c550 is mostly obtained from the soluble cell extract in relatively large amounts. In addition, the protein appeared to be truncated in the last hydrophobic residues of the C-terminus, both in the soluble cytochrome c550 and in the protein extracted from the membrane fraction, as deduced by mass spectrometry analysis and the comparison with the gene sequence. Interestingly, it has been described that the C-terminus of cytochrome c550 forms a hydrophobic finger involved in the interaction with photosystem II in cyanobacteria. Cytochrome c550 was almost absent in solubilized photosystem II complex samples, in contrast with the PsbO and Psb31 extrinsic subunits, thus suggesting a lower affinity of cytochrome c550 for the photosystem II complex. Under iron-limiting conditions the amount of cytochrome c550 decreases up to about 45% as compared to iron-replete cells, pointing to an iron-regulated synthesis. Oxidized cytochrome c550 has been characterized using continuous wave EPR and pulse techniques, including HYSCORE, and the obtained results have been interpreted in terms of the electrostatic charge distribution in the surroundings of the heme centre.España, MINECO BIO2012-35271, BIO2015-64169-P, MAT2011-23861 and CTQ2015-64486-

¿Un capítulo del triunfo del Estado? El primer positivismo jurídico alemán y la centralización del Derecho

Una de las características principales del Estado moderno es el monopolio del derecho. Entre los fundamentos teóricos de ese monopolio, el Positivismo jurídico tiene una posición especial. Habitualmente, los positivistas han sido vistos como autores que identifican el derecho con la voluntad del Estado. Se supone que están interesados sólo en la observación de los hechos acerca del origen del derecho y, consecuentemente, identifican el derecho con el hecho del poder político. La finalidad de este artículo es mostrar las opiniones de algunos juristas alemanes de principios del siglo XIX, considerados positivistas, sobre el monopolio estatal del derecho. Las fuentes muestran que la absorción política no fue admitida por todos esos juristas.One of the main features of modern State is the monopolization of law. And in the theoretical grounds for that, Legal Positivism has a special position. Usually positivists have been seen as authors who identify law with the will of the State. It is assumed that they are interested only in the observation of facts related with the origins of law, and consequently that they identify law with political power as a fact. The aim of this paper is to show the opinion of some early 19th century German lawyers, considered positivists, about the state monopolization of law. And the sources show that political absorption was not admitted by all of those lawyers

El «medium rei» y el contexto hermenéutico: similitudes y diferencias

Legal Realism is one of the most important branches of the Javier Hervada’s legal philosophy. Among other topics, legal realism mantains that law is, in its deeper sense, the «right thing», obtained from a objective features of a relation of justice. Legal hermeneutics also sustains a conception of law centered in concretion inside multiple contexts. There were simillarities between these theories, but there were also a clear difference: legal realism of thomist roots affirms the existente of evident precepts of natural law. Legal hermeneutics, mantains that human being exists always in a historical situation without objective foundations of metaphysical procedence.El realismo jurídico es una de las partes más importantes de la filosofía jurídica de Javier Hervada. Entre otras nociones, el realismo jurídico mantiene que el derecho es, en su sentido más profundo, la «cosa justa», obtenida desde las características objetivas de una relación de justicia. La hermenéutica jurídica también sostiene una concepción del derecho centrada en la concreción dentro de diversos contextos. Hay similitudes entre estas teorías, pero también hay una diferencia clara: el realismo jurídico de raíces tomistas afirma la existencia de principios evidentes del derecho natural. La hermenéutica jurídica mantiene que el ser humano existe siempre en una situación histórica sin fundamentos objetivos de procedencia metafísica