Misoprostol: su uso para el aborto no punible

Área de Salud, Economía y Socieda

Análise do impacto da pandemia de COVID-19 sobre a atenção a mulheres em situação de aborto na América Latina e Caribe

Objective: to understand the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on aspects of quality of care provided to women in abortion situations in sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network (a multicenter network with international cooperation with the aim of encouraging good practices in Latin America and the Caribbean). Methods: cross-sectional study between January/2017 and December/2021 with women of any age admitted for abortion or miscarriage. We analyzed the total number of cases and the proportion of legal abortions. The dependent variables were complications and use of contraceptives after abortion. The independent variables were COVID-19 pandemic, clinical and sociodemographic data. Statistical analysis was carried out using linear regression, multiple Poisson regression, Cochran-Armitage, chi-square, Mann-Whitney and Cohen tests. Results: we analyzed data from 93689 women assisted in 12 sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network, 64.55% in the pre-pandemic period (NP) and 35.45% in the pandemic period (PP) (22.73% received post-abortion care and 77.27% legal abortion). We found no differences in the number of cases over the period, regardless of the legal context. We observed a significant increase in the proportion of legal abortions in liberal and moderate contexts. In NP, 46.46% of women underwent medical abortion, while 62.18% of women underwent medical abortion in PP (h-Cohen 0.32). We found no increase in the number of complications during PP. In NP, 79.12% started contraceptives after abortion, while in PP, 70.39% started contraceptives after abortion (h-Cohen 0.20). Conclusion: the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a decrease in the number of cases, a decrease in the proportion of legal interruptions, or an increase in complications in sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network. Submission: 30/04/23|Review: 08/11/23|Approval: 09/11/23Objetivo: comprender la influencia de la pandemia de COVID-19 en aspectos de la calidad de la atención brindada a las mujeres en situación de aborto en los centros centinela de la Red CLAP-MUSA (una red multicéntrica de cooperación internacional con el objetivo de fomentar buenas prácticas en América Latina y el Caribe). Metodología: estudio transversal entre enero/2017 y diciembre/2021 con mujeres de cualquier edad ingresadas para abortos espontáneos o inducidos. Se analizó el número total de casos y la proporción de abortos legales. Las variables dependientes fueron las complicaciones y el uso de anticonceptivos después del aborto. Las variables independientes fueron pandemia de COVID-19, datos clínicos y sociodemográficos. El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante regresión lineal, regresión múltiple de Poisson, pruebas de Cochran-Armitage, chi-cuadrado, Mann-Whitney y Cohen. Resultados: se analizaron datos de 93689 mujeres atendidas en 12 centros centinela de la Red CLAP-MUSA, 64,55% en el período prepandemia (NP) y 35,45% en el período pandemia (PP) (22,73% recibieron atención postaborto y 77,27% aborto legal). No encontramos diferencias en el número de casos durante el período, independientemente del contexto legal. Observamos un aumento significativo en la proporción de abortos legales en contextos liberales y moderados. En NP, el 46,46% de las mujeres se sometieron al aborto con medicamentos, mientras que el 62,18% de las mujeres se sometieron al aborto con medicamentos en PP (h-Cohen 0,32). No encontramos aumento en el número de complicaciones durante el PP. En NP, 79,12% inició anticonceptivos después del aborto, mientras que en PP, 70,39% inició anticonceptivos después del aborto (h-Cohen 0,20). Conclusión: la pandemia de COVID-19 no se asoció con una disminución en el número de casos, una disminución en la proporción de interrupciones legales o un aumento en las complicaciones en los centros centinela de la Red CLAP-MUSA. Acceptación: 30/04/23|Revisión: 08/11/23|Aprobación: 09/11/23Objetivo: compreender a influência da pandemia de COVID-19 nos aspectos da qualidade da assistência prestada às mulheres em situação de abortamento nos centros sentinela da Rede CLAP-MUSA, uma rede multicêntrica com cooperação internacional visando encorajar boas práticas na América Latina e no Caribe. Metodologia: estudo transversal entre janeiro/2017 e dezembro/2021 com mulheres de qualquer idade admitidas por abortamentos espontâneos ou induzidos. Analisamos o número total de casos e a proporção de abortos legais. As variáveis dependentes foram complicações e uso de anticoncepcionais após o aborto. As variáveis independentes foram a pandemia de COVID-19, dados clínicos e sociodemográficos. A análise estatística foi realizada por meio de regressão linear, regressão múltipla de Poisson, testes de Cochran-Armitage, qui-quadrado, Mann-Whitney e Cohen. Resultados: foram analisados dados de 93.689 mulheres, atendidas em 12 centros sentinelas da Rede CLAP-MUSA, 64,55% no período pré-pandêmico (NP) e 35,45% no período pandêmico (PP) (22,73% receberam atendimento pós-aborto e 77,27%, aborto legal). Não encontramos diferenças no número de casos ao longo do período, independentemente do contexto legal. Observamos um aumento significativo na proporção de abortos legais em contextos liberais e moderados. No NP, 46,46% das mulheres realizaram aborto medicamentoso, enquanto 62,18% das mulheres realizaram aborto medicamentoso no PP (h-Cohen 0,32). Não encontramos aumento no número de complicações durante o PP. No NP, 79,12% iniciaram anticoncepcionais após o aborto, enquanto no PP, 70,39% iniciaram anticoncepcionais após o aborto (h-Cohen 0,20). Conclusão: a pandemia de COVID-19 não se associou à diminuição do número de casos, à diminuição da proporção de interrupções legais ou ao aumento de complicações nos centros sentinelas da Rede CLAP-MUSA. Submissão: 30/04/23|Revisão: 08/11/23|Aprovação: 09/11/2

Woman- Centered Post-Abortion Care In Public Hospitals In Tucuman, Argentina: Assessing Quality of Care and Its Link to Human Rights

Unsafe abortion is a major public health and human rights problem inArgentina. Implementation of a woman-centered post-abortion care(PAC) model is one strategy to improve the situation. The quality of PACservices was measured in three public hospitals in Tucumin, a provincewith high levels of poverty and maternal mortality due to unsafe abortion.Overall, the quality of PAC services was found to be poor. Womendo not receive services in a manner that respects their human rights, inparticular their rights to health and health care, information, and to thebenefits of scientific progress. Findings from the evaluation are beingused to develop collaborative NGO/hospital/policy-maker efforts to improvePAC services through better training of health care providers

Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends treatment and management of gestational diabetes (GD) through lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise, and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) to inform timely treatment decisions. To expand the evidence base of WHO's guideline on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review of SMBG among pregnant individuals with GD.SettingFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, and EMBASE for publications through November 2020 comparing SMBG with clinic-based monitoring during antenatal care (ANC) globally.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe extracted data using standardized forms and summarized maternal and newborn findings using random effects meta-analysis in GRADE evidence tables. We also reviewed studies on values, preferences, and costs of SMBG.ResultsWe identified 6 studies examining SMBG compared to routine ANC care, 5 studies on values and preferences, and 1 study on costs. Nearly all were conducted in Europe and North America. Moderate-certainty evidence from 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that SMBG as part of a package of interventions for GD treatment was associated with lower rates of preeclampsia, lower mean birthweight, fewer infants born large for gestational age, fewer infants with macrosomia, and lower rates of shoulder dystocia. There was no difference between groups in self-efficacy, preterm birth, C-section, mental health, stillbirth, or respiratory distress. No studies measured placenta previa, long-term complications, device-related issues, or social harms. Most end-users supported SMBG, motivated by health benefits, convenience, ease of use, and increased confidence. Health workers acknowledged SMBG's convenience but were wary of technical problems. One study found SMBG by pregnant individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with decreased costs for hospital admission and length of stay.ConclusionSMBG during pregnancy is feasible and acceptable, and when combined in a package of GD interventions, is generally associated with improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, research from resource-limited settings is needed.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42021233862

The Role of Gender Inequality and Health Expenditure on the Coverage of Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Contraceptives: A Multilevel Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies in 14 LAC Countries

BACKGROUND: Despite international efforts to improve reproductive health indicators, little attention is paid to the contributions of contextual factors to modern contraceptive coverage, especially in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region. This study aimed to identify the association between country-level Gender Inequality and Health Expenditure with demand for family planning satisfied by modern contraceptive methods (DFPSm) in Latin American sexually active women. METHODS: Our analyses included data from the most recent (post-2010) Demographic and Health Survey or Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey from 14 LAC countries. Descriptive analyses and multilevel logistic regressions were performed. Six individual-level factors were included. The effect of the country-level factors Gender Inequality Index (GII) and Current Health Expenditure on DFPSm was investigated. FINDINGS: DFPSm ranged from 41.8% (95% CI: 40.2-43.5) in Haiti to 85.6% (95% CI: 84.9-86.3) in Colombia, with an overall median coverage of 77.8%. A direct association between the odds of DFPSm and woman\u27s education, wealth index, and the number of children was identified. Women from countries in the highest GII tertile were less likely (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.76) to have DFPSm than those living in countries in the lowest tertile. INTERPRETATION: Understanding the contribution of country-level factors to modern contraception may allow macro-level actions focused on the population\u27s reproductive needs. In this sense, country-level gender inequalities play an important role, as well as individual factors such as wealth and education. FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)

Evolution towards the elimination of congenital syphilis in Latin America and the Caribbean: a multicountry analysis

Objective. Effective and low-cost interventions for preventing the vertical transmission of syphilis can substantially reduce mortality and morbidity related to maternal and congenital syphilis. This study aims to identify successes and problems in eliminating congenital syphilis in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Methods. Conducted in 2015, this multicountry study included qualitative data from focal point staff members of the Pan American Health Organization, as well as country information and answers to semiqualitative questions on the elimination of congenital syphilis. Additional information was obtained from five Caribbean countries and Panama. Results. Few of the studied LAC countries use a rapid syphilis test, but most of them do have benzathine penicillin available in primary care facilities. The majority of the countries have national strategies and protocols for eliminating congenital syphilis. There were substantial differences among the national information systems, including with data collection, analysis, and quality control. The major challenges related to eliminating congenital syphilis are the need to improve: prenatal care; test coverage; health worker training about syphilis diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up; and access to institutional deliveries. Other problems include a lack of rapid tests; shortages of benzathine penicillin; and substandard laboratory quality. Poor follow-up of maternal syphilis cases and their sexual contacts was also reported. Conclusions. Most of the LAC countries studied have national strategic plans and protocols and have advanced in the elimination of congenital syphilis. These countries must keep improving their capacity to collect high-quality data about coverage and inequities and use this data as a basis for decision-making. To accelerate the elimination of congenital syphilis, the good practices and actions that have been undertaken must be reinforced

La iniciativa internacional por el nacimiento MadreBebé: Un abordaje de la atención materna eficiente a la luz de los derechos humanos

Este artículo describe la historia, principios y los 10 pasos de la Iniciativa Internacional por el Nacimiento MadreBebé (IMBCI), creado por la Organización Internacional por el Nacimiento MadreBebe, lanzado en marzo de 2008. La IMBCI A iniciativa internacional pelo nascimento MãeBebê: Uma abordagem de um atendimento materno eficiente à luz dos direitos humanos1 The International MotherBaby Childbirth Initiative: A Human Rights Approach to Optimal Maternity Care La iniciativa internacional por el nacimiento MadreBebé: Un abordaje de la atención materna eficiente a la luz de los derechos humanos REFLEXÕES SOBRE HUMANIZAÇÃO E A REALIDADE DOS SERVIÇOS REFLECTIONS ON HUMANIZATION AND THE REALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA HUMANIZACIÓN Y LA REALIDAD DE LOS SERVICIOS 94 // Rev Tempus Actas Saúde Col actualmente está desarrollando tres proyectos ilotos en hospitales de Quebec, Brasil y Austria y construye en varios países la Red MadreBebé (MBnets). Un componente critico de la IMBCI es destacar el hecho de que “los derechos de las mujeres y de los niños son derechos humanos” y que “el acceso a la salud humana e eficaz es un derecho humano básico”

Self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights for advancing universal health coverage

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. There should be no suggestion that the World Health Organization endorses any specific organization, products or services. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL. The authors are staff members of the World Health Organization and are themselves alone responsible for the views expressed in the Article, which do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the World Health Organization or Taylor & Francis Group.WHO's normative guidance on self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) promotes comprehensive, integrated and people-centred approaches to health service delivery. Implementation of self-care interventions within the context of human rights, gender equality, and a life course approach, offers an underused opportunity to improve universal health coverage (UHC) for all. Results from an online global values and preferences survey provided lay persons' and healthcare providers' perspectives on access, acceptability, and implementation considerations. This analysis examines 326 qualitative responses to open-ended questions from healthcare providers (n = 242) and lay persons (n = 70) from 77 countries. Participants were mostly women (66.9%) and were from the Africa (34.5%), America (32.5%), South-East Asia (5.6%), European (19.8%), Eastern Mediterranean (4.8%), and Western Pacific regions (2.8%). Participants perceived multiple benefits of self-care interventions for SRHR, including: reduced exposure to stigma, discrimination and access barriers, increased confidentiality, empowerment, self-confidence, and informed decision-making. Concerns include insufficient knowledge, affordability, and possible side-effects. Implementation considerations highlighted the innovative approaches to linkages with health services. Introduction of self-care interventions is a paradigm shift in health care delivery bridging people and communities through primary health care to reach UHC. Self-care interventions can be leveraged by countries as gateways for reaching more people with quality, accessible and equitable services that is critical for achieving UHC. The survey results underscored the urgent need to reduce stigma and discrimination, increase access to and improve knowledge of self-care interventions for SRHR for laypersons and healthcare providers to advance SRHR

Multicountry research on comprehensive abortion policy implementation in Latin America: a mixed-methods study protocol

Introduction Access to comprehensive abortion care could prevent the death of between 13 865 and 38 940 women and the associated morbidity of 5 million women worldwide. There have been some important improvements in Latin America in terms of laws and policies on abortion. However, the predominant environment is still restrictive, and many women, adolescents and girls still face multiple barriers to exercise their reproductive rights. This research will systematically assess comprehensive abortion policies in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Mexico and Uruguay). The aim is to identify barriers, facilitators and strategies to the implementation of abortion policies, looking at four key dimensions—regulatory framework, abortion policy dynamics, abortion service delivery and health system and health outcomes indicators—to draw cross-cutting lessons learnt to improve current implementation and inform future safe abortion policy development.Methods and analysis A mixed-method design will be used in the five countries to address the four dimensions through the Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Quality of Care model. The data collection tools include desk reviews and semi-structured interviews with key actors. Analysis will be performed using thematic analysis and stakeholder analysis. A regional synthesis exercise will be conducted to draw lessons on barriers, facilitators and the strategies.Ethics and dissemination The project has been approved by the WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (ID: A66023) and by the local research ethics committees. Informed consent will be obtained from participants. Data will be treated with careful attention to protecting privacy and confidentiality. Findings from the study will be disseminated through a multipurpose strategy to target diverse audiences to foster the use of the study findings to inform the public debate agenda and policy implementation at national level. The strategy will include academic, advocacy and policy arenas and actors, including peer-reviewed publication and national and regional dissemination workshops