103 research outputs found

    Biomass allocation to reproductive and vegetative structures in male (M) and female (F) plants of the three studied species.

    No full text
    <p>Data for <i>C. alternans</i> and <i>C. ernesti-augusti</i> were obtained from Oyama and Dirzo (1988), and Bullock (1984), respectively. Error bars denote standard error.</p

    Comparison between male (M) and female (F) plants in two defensive characteristics of the three studied species.

    No full text
    <p>A) leaf toughness, B) total phenolic concentration. Error bars denote standard error.</p

    Comparison of two measures of herbivory between male (M) and female (F) plants of the three studied species.

    No full text
    <p>A) standing levels of damage measured in 2002, B) rates of herbivory measured in 2001–2002. Error bars denote standard error.</p

    Comparison between male (M) and female (F) plants of four growth variables of the three studied species.

    No full text
    <p>A) total height increment, B) leaf production rate, C) above-ground biomass production. Error bars denote standard error.</p

    Nested ANOVAs to assess the effects of species, sex and their interaction, on four growth variables measured in two periods.

    No full text
    <p>Total height increment (THI) and leaf production rate (LPR) for 2001–2002; relative growth rate (RGR), net biomass production (BP) and LPR for 2005–2007. *<i>P</i><0.05, *** <i>P</i><0.0001.</p

    Transgenerational induction of wild radish palatability trials results

    No full text
    Results from three palatability trials. Leaf tissue from wild radish plants with differing histories of herbivore induction (induced or non-induced ("I" or "N") for grandparents, parents, and current generation) presented to either a generalist slug or a specialist caterpillar. Leaf weight consumed measured after 18 hours as well as weight of the herbivore as a covariate
    corecore