10 research outputs found
Resultados del tratamiento del hiperparatiroidismo renal mediante paratiroidectomĂa total y autotrasplante
Tesis de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de CirugĂa, leĂda el 30-09-2009Depto. de CirugĂaFac. de MedicinaTRUEpu
Evaluation of a workshop to teach a new surgical technique in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Purpose
Assess the utility of a hands-on workshop on abdominal wall reconstruction for teaching the posterior components separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis release.
Methods
Our department has been organizing a training course on abdominal wall reconstruction for the last 6 years. It is a 2-day-long course and 10â12 surgeons with experience in abdominal wall surgery attend to every course. The first day is dedicated to theoretical lectures and two simultaneous live surgeries, and the second day there is a cadaver dissection. Feedback from the trainees was collected at the end of the workshop. A survey was sent to all the surgeons who had completed the course at least a year ago, to inquire how the course had improved their surgical practice.
Results
From 2013 to April 2017, we have made 15 editions of the course. A total of 192 surgeons from Europe, South Africa and Middle East attended. All the surgeons answered the survey that was carried out at the end of the course. It showed a very high level of satisfaction in more than 98% of the cases. The second survey was answered by 79 surgeons (41.15%). 96% of the surgeons had modified, after attending the course, their way of dealing with complex abdominal wall problems. Only 29% of the surgeons had made a TAR before attending the course, while 86% are performing it after attending the course and 60% do it on a regular basis. In fact, 43% of surgeons have performed more than five posterior component separations in the last year.
Conclusions
A workshop of abdominal wall surgery that combines live surgery, theoretical content and a cadaver lab can be a very useful tool to expand the use of new surgical techniques.pre-print424 K
Combining anterior and posterior component separation for extreme cases of abdominal wall reconstruction.
Purpose: The closure of midline in abdominal wall incisional hernias is an essential principle. In some exceptional circumstances, despite adequate component separation techniques, this midline closure cannot be achieved. This study aims to review the results of using both anterior and component separation in these exceptional cases.
Methods: We reviewed our experience using the combination of both anterior and posterior component separation in the attempt to close the midline. Our first step was to perform a TAR and a complete extensive dissection of the retromuscular preperitoneal plane developed laterally as far as the posterior axillary line. When the closure of midline was not possible, an external oblique release was made. A retromuscular preperitoneal reinforcement was made with the combination of an absorbable mesh and a 50 Ă 50 polypropylene mesh.
Results: Twelve patients underwent anterior and posterior component separation. The mean hernia width was 23.5 ± 5. The majority were classified as severe complex incisional hernia and had previous attempts of repair. After a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 8-45), no case of recurrence was registered. Only one patient (8.33%) presented with an asymptomatic bulging in the follow-up. European Hernia Society's quality of life scores showed a significant improvement at 2 years postoperatively in the three domains: pain (p = 0.01), restrictions (p = 0.04) and cosmetic (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: The combination of posterior and anterior component separation can effectively treat massive and challenging cases of abdominal wall reconstruction in which the primary midline closure is impossible to achieve despite appropriate optimization of surgery.post-print1,08 M
Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy.
Background
The prevalence of incisional hernias (IHs) is still high after midline laparotomy (ML). There is an increasing body of evidence that prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) can be safe and efficient in the short-term outcomes, but there still are some concerns about the potential long-term complications of these meshes. This study describes our long-term PMP experience.
Methods
Observational and prospective study including all patients undergoing the use of prophylactic onlay large-pore polypropylene meshes for the closure of ML since 2008 to 2014. Outcome measures included demographics, perioperative details, wound complications, recurrences, reoperations and chronic complications.
Results
A cohort of 172 patients was analysed: 75% elective surgery, 25% emergency cases. Mean age was 68 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 kg/m2. Wound classification: 6.4% clean; 85% clean-contaminated; 1.2% contaminated and 8.1% dirty. Follow-up of patients was up to 8 years (mean: 5â±â1.6). Two meshes were removed due to chronic infection in first six postoperative months. Of the 13 patients (9.02%) who developed IH, 5 of them have been reoperated for IH repair without any difficulty related to previous mesh. During follow-up, 8 patients have been reoperated for other reasons and the integrity of abdominal wall was also checked. After the comparative study, higher BMI and emergency surgery were still risk factors for IH despite PMP.
Conclusions
In our setting, the use of polypropylene prophylactic meshes in MLs is safe, efficient and durable.pre-print977 K
Second Look After Retromuscular Repair With the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Meshes.
Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the macroscopic features and histologic
details observed after retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction with the combination
of an absorbable mesh and a permanent mesh.
Methods: We have considered all patients that underwent abdominal wall
reconstruction (AWR) with the combination of two meshes that required to be reoperated
for any reason. Data was extracted from a prospective multicenter study from 2012 to
2019.Macroscopic evaluation of parietal adhesions and histological analysis were carried
out in this group of patients.
Results: Among 466 patients with AWR, we identified 26 patients that underwent a
reoperation after abdominal wall reconstruction using absorbable and permanent mesh.
In eight patients, the reoperation was related to abdominal wall issues: four patients were
reoperated due to recurrence, three patients required an operation for chronic mesh
infection and one patient for symptomatic bulging. A miscellanea of pathologies was
the cause for reoperation in 18 patients. During the second surgical procedures made
after a minimum of 3 months follow-up, a fibrous tissue between the permanent mesh
covering and protecting the peritoneum was identified. This fibrous tissue facilitated blunt
dissection between the permanent material and the peritoneum. Samples of this tissue
were obtained for histological examination. No case of severe adhesions to the abdominal
wall was seen. In four cases, the reoperation could be carried out laparoscopically with
minimal adhesions from the previous procedure.
Conclusions: The reoperations performed after the combination of absorbable and
permanent meshes have shown that the absorbable mesh acts as a protective barrier
and is replaced by a fibrous layer rich in collagen. In the cases requiring new hernia
repair, the layer between peritoneum and permanent mesh could be dissected without
special difficulty. Few intraperitoneal adhesions to the abdominal wall were observed,
mainly filmy, easy to detach, facilitating reoperations.post-print6360 K
Stepwise transversus abdominis muscle release for the treatment of complex bilateral subcostal incisional hernias.
Background
Management of subcostal incisional hernias is particularly complicated due to their proximity to the costochondral limits in addition to the lack of aponeurosis on the lateral side of the abdomen. We present our results of posterior component separation through the same previous incision as a safe and reproducible technique for these complex cases.
Methods
We present a multicenter and prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with bilateral subcostal incisional hernias on either clinical examination or imaging based on computed tomography from 2014 to 2020. The aim of this investigation was to assess the outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction for subcostal incisional hernias through a new approach. The outcomes reported were short- and long-term complications, including recurrence, pain, and bulging. Quality of life was assessed with the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score.
Results
A total of 46 patients were identified. All patients underwent posterior component separation. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 10 patients (22%), with only 7 patients (15%) requiring procedural intervention. During a mean follow-up of 18 (range, 6â62), 1 (2%) case of clinical recurrence was registered. In addition, there were 8 (17%) patients with asymptomatic but visible bulging. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score showed a statistically significant decrease in the 3 domains (pain, restriction, and cosmetic) of the postoperative compared with the preoperative scores.
Conclusion
Posterior component separation technique for the repair of subcostal incisional hernias through the same incision is a safe procedure that avoids injury to the linea alba. It is associated with acceptable morbidity, low recurrence rate, and improvement in patientsâ reported outcomes.pre-print371 K
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Utilizing the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Mesh in a Retromuscular Position: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Background Optimal mesh reinforcement for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in complex hernias remains
questionable. Use of biologic, absorbable and synthetic meshes has been described. The idea of using an absorbable
mesh (AM) under a permanent mesh (PM) in a retromuscular position may help in these challenging situations.
Methods Between 2011 and 2016, consecutive patients undergoing open AWR utilizing an AM as posterior layer
reinforcement and configuration of a large PM were identified in a multicenter prospectively maintained database in
four hospitals. Main outcomes included demographics, ventral hernia classifications, perioperative data, complications and recurrences.
Results A total of 169 complex incisional hernias were analyzed. Mean age was 60.9, with mean body mass index
30.7 (range: 20â46). Location of incisional hernias (IH) was: 80 midline, 59 lateral and 30 midline and lateral. 78%
were grade I and II in Ventral Hernia Working Group classification. 52% of patients were discharged with no
complication. There were 19% seromas, 13% hematomas, 12% surgical-site infection and 10% skin dehiscence. Only
partial mesh removal was necessary in one patient. After a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 15â59), there were
five (3.2%) recurrences. Reoperations on patients showed a band of fibrosis separating the peritoneum from the PM.
Conclusion The combination of AM with very large PM in the same retromuscular position in AWR seems to be
safe. The efficacy with recurrence rates below 4% in complex midline and lateral IH may be explained by the use of
larger PMs that are extended and configured with the support of AMs. Reoperations on patients have confirmed the
previous experimental reports on the use of the AM.pre-print1351 K
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with the combination of complex midline and lateral incisional hernias.
Background
The best treatment for the combined defects of midline and lateral incisional hernia is not known. The aim of our multicenter study was to evaluate the operative and patient-reported outcomes using a modified posterior component separation in patients who present with the combination of midline and lateral incisional hernia.
Methods
We identified patients from a prospective, multicenter database who underwent operative repairs of a midline and lateral incisional hernia at 4 centers with minimum 2-year follow-up. Hernias were divided into a main hernia based on the larger size and associated abdominal wall hernias. Outcomes reported were short- and long-term complications, including recurrence, pain, and bulging. Quality of life was assessed with the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score.
Results
Fifty-eight patients were identified. Almost 70% of patients presented with a midline defect as the main incisional hernia. The operative technique was a transversus abdominis release in 26 patients (45%), a modification of transversus abdominis release 27 (47%), a reverse transversus abdominis release in 3 (5%), and a primary, lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 2 (3%). Surgical site occurrences occurred in 22 patients (38%), with only 8 patients (14%) requiring procedural intervention. During a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 14.4 months, 2 (3%) cases of recurrence were diagnosed and required reoperation. There were also 4 (7%) patients with asymptomatic but visible bulging. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score showed a statistically significant decrease in the 3 domains (pain, restriction, and cosmetic) in the postoperative score compared with the preoperative score.
Conclusion
The different techniques of posterior component separation in the treatment of combined midline and lateral incisional hernia show acceptable results, despite the associated high complexity. Patient-reported outcomes after measurement of the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score demonstrated a clinically important improvement in quality of life and pain.post-print2.323 K
Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis in a Low-Volume Hospital.
Background
Up to 25% of patients with acute pancreatitis develop severe complications and are classified as severe pancreatitis with a high death rate. To improve outcomes, patients may require interventional measures including surgical procedures. Multidisciplinary approach and best practice guidelines are important to decrease mortality.
Methods
We have conducted a retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database in a low-volume hospital. A total of 1075 patients were attended for acute pancreatitis over a ten-year period. We have analysed 44 patients meeting the criteria for severe acute pancreatitis and for intensive care unit (ICU) admittance. Demographics and clinical data were analysed. Patients were treated according to international guidelines and a multidisciplinary flowchart for acute pancreatitis and a step-up approach for pancreatic necrosis.
Results
Forty-four patients were admitted to the ICU due to severe acute pancreatitis. Twenty-five patients needed percutaneous drainage of peri-pancreatic or abdominal fluid collections or cholecystitis. Eight patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis and biliary sepsis or pancreatic leakage, and one patient received endoscopic trans-gastric endoscopic prosthesis for pancreatic necrosis. Sixteen patients underwent surgery: six patients for septic abdomen, four patients for pancreatic necrosis and two patients due to abdominal compartment syndrome. Four patients had a combination of surgical procedures for pancreatic necrosis and for abdominal compartment syndrome. Overall mortality was 9.1%.
Conclusion
Severe acute pancreatitis represents a complex pathology that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Establishing best practice treatments and evidence-based guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis may improve outcomes in low-volume hospitals.pre-print158 K
Prophylactic mesh can be used safely in the prevention of incisional hernia after bilateral subcostal laparotomies.
Background
The use of prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia is becoming increasingly common in midline laparotomies and colostomies. The incidence of incisional hernia after subcostal laparotomies is lower than after midline incisions. Nevertheless, the treatment of subcostal incisional hernia is considered to be more complex. Currently, there are no published data about mesh augmentation procedures to close these laparotomies.
Methods
This was a longitudinal, prospective, cohort study of patients undergoing a bilateral subcostal laparotomy in elective operations. The mesh group was a group of patients operated consecutively between 2011 and 2013 with a prophylactic self-fixation mesh. The control group was selected from a retrospective analysis of patients operated between 2009 and 2010 and closed with a conventional protocol of 2-layer closure. The incidence of incisional hernia was recorded both clinically and radiologically for 2 years.
Results
A total of 57 patients were included in the control group and 58 in the mesh group. Most patients underwent gastric, hepatic, and pancreatic operations. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of their clinical and demographic characteristics. Operative time and hospital stay were similar in both groups. Both groups had a comparable rate of local and systemic complications. Ten patients (17.5%) in the control group developed an incisional hernia, and only 1 patient (1.7%) in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia (P = .0006).
Conclusion
The incidence of incisional hernia after a conventional closure of bilateral subcostal laparotomy is significant. The use of a mesh augmentation procedure for closing bilateral subcostal laparotomies is safe and may reduce the incidence of incisional hernia.pre-print1514 K