22 research outputs found

    Prolidase metal content.

    No full text
    <p>Mn(II) and Zn(II) content was analyzed by ICP-MS after 48 h dialysis against metal free buffer based on their presence in the enzyme active site as previously demonstrated <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058792#pone.0058792-Besio2" target="_blank">[4]</a>.</p

    Mutant prolidase forms <i>in silico</i> modeling.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Human prolidase dimer: the two prolidase interfacing monomers are reported as a green cartoon (molecule A) and as a grey surface (molecule B), with Mn(II) shown as dark grey spheres. The magenta color was chosen to identify mutated residues. On molecule A, Mn(II) coordinating residues (D276, D287, E412 and E452) and the phosphate group (orange) are highlighted as sticks. Y231 residues from molecules A and B are located on the C-terminal portion of two α-helices arranged in a symmetric and anti-parallel manner, allowing their interaction with E223 of the interfacing protomer. (B) Destabilization of prolidase core structural elements upon G448R mutation. R448 substituenting residue is reported in spheres to highlight its steric hindrance. The protein portion that buries the mutated residue is shown as a grey surface. A red dashed line indicates the distance between the average position of Mn(II) ions and the C<sub>α</sub> of the substituted residue. (C) E412K substitution does not impair ions binding. Solvent molecules occupy a small cavity near the active site, and are represented with red crosses. This small cavity can host the side chain of the mutated K412 (reported in sticks with green carbon atoms and the nitrogen atom in blue) which substitutes E412 (magenta carbon and red oxygen atoms). The putative location of the K412 side chain here proposed may be set by the electrostatic repulsion exerted by residue R450 (shown in sticks with grey carbon atoms).</p

    Prolidase thermal denaturation and dimerization follow up.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Protein melting temperatures in the presence of the cofactor as revealed by Thermofluor Technology. The solvatochromic dye SYPRO orange was used as an indicator of protein unfolding (fluorescence excitation λ = 492 nm; fluorescence emission λ = 568 nm). (B) The ratio between prolidase activity and protein concentration was plotted against protein concentration.</p

    Human prolidase activity and protein expression.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Mutations and clinical phenotype of the PD patients used for the study. (B) Prolidase activity levels, and (C) prolidase expression levels in control (WT) and PD patients fibroblasts lysates (231delY, E412K, G448R). Densitometric analysis of Western blots (C, top) shown in the lower part of the panel. (D) SDS-PAGE (top) and Western blotting (bottom) of purified recombinant WT and mutant forms. (E) Prolidase activity of the recombinant proteins.</p

    Transient increase in brain lesion volumes in ACKR2<sup>-/-</sup> after CHI.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Brain lesion volume was assessed by H&E staining at day 1 (n = 8), 3 (n = 9), and 7 (n = 5) after CHI. ACKR2<sup>-/-</sup> mice (white columns) were found to have significantly larger lesions as compared to WT mice (black columns) at day 1 post-CHI (* = p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed at later time points. ANOVA did not detect any significant effect of genotype. (B) Representative low and high magnification images of an ACKR2<sup>-/-</sup> mouse brain at 24 h post-CHI.</p

    CCL2 and ACKR2 transcripts are upregulated following human brain injury.

    No full text
    <p>(A-B) Levels of CCL2 (A) and ACKR2 (B) transcripts were assessed by qPCR in brain tissue from TBI patients that had died < 17 minutes (acute; n = 9), < 3 h (early; n = 8), or > 6 h (late; n = 6) after injury, and in patients whose cause of death was not brain injury (control; n = 8). ANOVA reported a significant increase in CCL2 expression in the late group versus the acute group (* = p < 0.05) and in the late contralateral (late CL; dotted boxes) group versus the control group (# = p < 0.05), and no significant effect of time on ACKR2 transcript expression. (C) Correlation of ACKR2 transcript levels with time.</p
    corecore