9 research outputs found

    Comparison of the Lung Parenchyma (N = 3–5 in each group) for WT (black) and Pak1<sup>−/−</sup> (grey) mice.

    No full text
    <p>There were no significant differences for lung volumes at 30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (p>0.37) (A); pressure volume curves normalized to volume at 30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (B); or Alveolar Mean Linear Intercepts (MLI) (p>0.40) (C).</p

    <i>In vivo</i> airway reactivity of Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice was lower than that of WT mice to aerosolized (A) and intra-venous (B) acetylcholine.

    No full text
    <p>Resistance in response to increasing concentrations of aerosolized acetylcholine (ACh) for wild-type (WT; N = 8) and Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice (N = 8) (A); values are means ± SEM. There was no difference in resistance at baseline. When analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, resistance increased with increasing ACh dose (p<0.0001), Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice had a significantly smaller slope of the dose response curve (p<0.03), and a significantly smaller increase in resistance compared to WT mice (p<0.03). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated Pak 1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> compared to WT mice had significantly smaller resistances at all ACh concentrations ≥7.5 mg/ml (p<0.05). Resistance in response to increasing concentrations of intravenous acetylcholine (ACh) for wild-type (WT; N = 4) and Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice (N = 4) (B); values are means ± SEM. There was no difference in resistance at baseline. When analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, resistance for Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice increased less with increasing ACh dose (p<0.0001) compared to WT mice. Post-hoc analysis demonstrated Pak1<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> compared to WT mice had significantly lower resistances at ACh concentrations ≥0.42 mg (p<0.05).</p

    Comparison of Lung Histology for WT and <i>Pak1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice.

    No full text
    <p>Airway wall area (A), airway smooth muscle area (B), and airway epithelium area (C) were not significantly different between the WT (black squares) and <i>Pak1</i><sup>−/−</sup> (grey circles) mice when assessed by ANOVA adjusting for airway perimeter (p>0.15). (N = 5 mice in each group).</p

    Aerosolized IPA3 inhibited airway contractility <i>in vivo</i> and suppressed Pak activation.

    No full text
    <p>When assessed by repeated ANOVA, resistance increased with increasing ACh dose (p<0.0001), and IPA3 dissolved in 1% DMSO (N = 3) and aerosolized 1-hour prior to bronchial challenge of WT mice significantly reduced the slope of the increase in resistance (p<0.0001), as well as the magnitude of the increase in resistance compared to control vehicle (1%DMSO; N = 5) (p<0.001) (A). Post-hoc analysis indicated that IPA3 treatment resulted in lower resistances at MCh doses ≥33 mg/ml (p<0.05). Tracheal smooth muscle isolated from WT mice treated <i>in vivo</i> with IPA3 demonstrated significantly lower Pak activation as assessed by Pak T423 phosphorylation following stimulation with ACh compared to airway smooth muscle isolated from WT mice (B). <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042601#s2" target="_blank">Results</a> represent 2 samples of tracheal smooth muscle from each group. Each sample consisted of pooled tracheal muscle tissues from 3 separate mice with the same treatment.</p

    Pak1, Pak2 and Pak3 isoforms were detected in WT murine tracheal smooth muscle by immunoblot.

    No full text
    <p>No Pak1 was detected in extracts of isolated tracheal smooth muscle (A) or whole tracheas (B) from <i>Pak1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice. Immunoblots of tracheal smooth muscle were obtained from tracheal smooth muscle extracts pooled from 3 mice of each type. Whole trachea extracts were each from a single mouse.</p

    Tracheas isolated from <i>Pak1</i><sup>−/−</sup> mice showed reduced contractility to ACh in vitro.

    No full text
    <p>Isometric force generation (% of maximal force to ACh stimulation in WT mice) was significantly lower in tracheas isolated from <i>Pak1</i><sup>−/−</sup> (grey squares) mice compared to WT (black diamonds) mice (N = 10 or 11 in each group, p<0.01).</p

    Lung function adjusted for body length and gestational age in male (black) and female (gray) premature infants.

    No full text
    <p>Data are represented as the mean (+SD). Sixty-six (35 female) were exposed to HCA (combined Grade 1 and Grade 2) and 29 not exposed to HCA (17 female). There was a significant sex by HCA interaction for FEF<sub>50</sub> (F = 8.76; p = 0.004), FEF<sub>25–75</sub> (F = 8.11; p = 0.005) and FEV<sub>0.5</sub> (F = 4.81; p = 0.031). Post hoc analyses revealed a significant reduction in lung function in exposed female preterm infants when compared to females not exposed to HCA. The effect of exposure to HCA was not significant in males. *<i>p</i><0.05, **<i>p</i><0.01 (Post hoc Holm-Sidak test).</p

    Lung function values, stratified by sex and chorioamnionitis.

    No full text
    <p>Lung function, Weight/age, and Length/age expressed in Z scores. Data are mean±SD.</p>*<p>p<0.05; **p<0.01; for Mann-Whitney Test for continuous variables between male versus female preterm infants and between None versus HCA Grade 1 and HCA Grade 2 combined.</p>#<p>p<0.05 for Jonckheere–Terpstra trend test for continuous variables between None, HCA Grade 1 and HCA Grade 2.</p
    corecore