Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research

Background: Citation analysis has become an important tool for research performance assessment in the medical sciences. However, different areas of medical research may have considerably different citation practices, even within the same medical field. Because of this, it is unclear to what extent citation-based bibliometric indicators allow for valid comparisons between research units active in different areas of medical research. Methodology: A visualization methodology is introduced that reveals differences in citation practices between medical research areas. The methodology extracts terms from the titles and abstracts of a large collection of publications and uses these terms to visualize the structure of a medical field and to indicate how research areas within this field differ from each other in their average citation impact. Results: Visualizations are provided for 32 medical fields, defined based on journal subject categories in the Web of Science database. The analysis focuses on three fields. In each of these fields, there turn out to be large differences in citation practices between research areas. Low-impact research areas tend to focus on clinical intervention research, while high-impact research areas are often more oriented on basic and diagnostic research. Conclusions: Popular bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index and the impact factor, do not correct for differences in citation practices between medical fields. These indicators therefore cannot be used to make accurate between-field comparisons. More sophisticated bibliometric indicators do correct for field differences but still fail to take into account within-field heterogeneity in citation practices. As a consequence, the citation impact of clinical intervention research may be substantially underestimated in comparison with basic and diagnostic research

Cardiologist and cardiac surgeon view on decision-making in prosthetic aortic valve selection: Does profession matter?

Aims Assess and compare among Dutch cardiothoracic surgeons and cardiologists: opinion on (1) patient involvement, (2) conveying risk in aortic valve selection, and (3) aortic valve preferences. Methods and results A survey among 117 cardiothoracic surgeons and cardiologists was conducted. Group responses were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Most respondents agreed that patients should be involved in decision-making, with surgeons leaning more toward patient involvement (always: 83 % versus 50 % respectively; p < 0.01) than cardiologists. Most respondents found that ideally doctors and patients should decide together, with cardiologists leaning more toward taking the lead compared with surgeons (p < 0.01). Major risks of the therapeutic options were usually discussed with patients, and less common complications to a lesser extent. A wide variation in valve preference was noted with cardiologists leaning more toward mechanical prostheses, while surgeons more often preferred bioprostheses (p < 0.05). Conclusion Patient involv

Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with heart failure after surgical ventricular restoration and restrictive mitral annuloplasty

ObjectiveDoppler echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging, is widely applied to assess diastolic left ventricular function using early transmitral flow velocity combined with mitral annular velocity as a noninvasive estimate of left ventricular filling pressures. However, the accuracy of early transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular velocity in patients with heart failure, particularly after extensive cardiac surgery, is debated. Global diastolic strain rate during isovolumic relaxation obtained with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking analysis was recently proposed as an alternative approach to estimate left ventricular filling pressures.MethodsWe analyzed diastolic function in patients with heart failure after surgical ventricular restoration and/or restrictive mitral annuloplasty. Echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking analysis, was performed to determine early transmitral flow velocity/atrial transmitral flow velocity, isovolumetric relaxation time, deceleration time, early transmitral flow velocity/mean mitral annular velocity, strain rate during isovolumic relaxation, and early transmitral flow velocity/strain rate during isovolumic relaxation. These noninvasive indices were correlated with relaxation time constant Tau, peak rate of pressure decline, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure obtained in the catheterization room using high-fidelity pressure catheters.ResultsTwenty-three patients were analyzed 6 months after restrictive mitral annuloplasty (n = 8), surgical ventricular restoration (n = 4), or a combined procedure (n = 11). The strongest correlation with invasive indices, in particular left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, was found for strain rate during isovolumic relaxation (r = −0.76, P < .001). Early transmitral flow velocity/mean mitral annular velocity did not correlate significantly with any of the invasive indices. Strain rate during isovolumic relaxation (cutoff value < 0.38 s−1) accurately predicted left ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 16 mm Hg or more with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity.ConclusionsIn a group of patients with heart failure who were investigated 6 months after cardiac surgery, early transmitral flow velocity/mean mitral annular velocity correlated poorly with invasively obtained diastolic indexes. Global strain rate during isovolumic relaxation, however, correlated well with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and peak rate of pressure decline. Our data suggest that global strain rate during isovolumic relaxation is a promising noninvasive index to assess left ventricular filling pressures in patients with heart failure after extensive cardiac surgery, including restrictive mitral annuloplasty and surgical ventricular restoration

Histopathology of aortic complications in bicuspid aortic valve versus Marfan syndrome: relevance for therapy?

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) are more prone to develop aortic dilation and dissection compared to persons with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). To elucidate potential common and distinct pathways of clinical relevance, we compared the histopathological substrates of aortopathy. Ascending aortic wall biopsies were divided in five groups: BAV (n = 36) and TAV (n = 23) without and with dilation and non-dilated MFS (n = 8). General histologic features, apoptosis, the expr

The role of hemoadsorption in cardiac surgery - a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal blood purification has been widely used in intensive care medicine, nephrology, toxicology, and other fields. During the last decade, with the emergence of new adsorptive blood purification devices, hemoadsorption has been increasingly applied during CPB in cardiac surgery, for patients at different inflammatory risks, or for postoperative complications. Clinical evidence so far has not provided definite answers concerning this adjunctive treatment. The current systematic review aimed to critically assess the role of perioperative hemoadsorption in cardiac surgery, by summarizing the current knowledge in this clinical setting. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane library, and the database provided by CytoSorbents was conducted on June 1st, 2023. The search terms were chosen by applying neutral search keywords to perform a non-biased systematic search, including language variations of terms "cardiac surgery" and "hemoadsorption". The screening and selection process followed scientific principles (PRISMA statement). Abstracts were considered for inclusion if they were written in English and published within the last ten years. Publications were eligible for assessment if reporting on original data from any type of study (excluding case reports) in which a hemoadsorption device was investigated during or after cardiac surgery. Results were summarized according to sub-fields and presented in a tabular view. RESULTS: The search resulted in 29 publications with a total of 1,057 patients who were treated with hemoadsorption and 988 control patients. Articles were grouped and descriptively analyzed due to the remarkable variability in study designs, however, all reported exclusively on CytoSorb$^{®}$ therapy. A total of 62% (18/29) of the included articles reported on safety and no unanticipated adverse events have been observed. The most frequently reported clinical outcome associated with hemoadsorption was reduced vasopressor demand resulting in better hemodynamic stability. CONCLUSIONS: The role of hemoadsorption in cardiac surgery seems to be justified in selected high-risk cases in infective endocarditis, aortic surgery, heart transplantation, and emergency surgery in patients under antithrombotic therapy, as well as in those who develop a dysregulated inflammatory response, vasoplegia, or septic shock postoperatively. Future large randomized controlled trials are needed to better define proper patient selection, dosing, and timing of the therapy

Role of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular repair/insertion

During the last decade, the development of transcatheter based therapies has provided feasible therapeutic options for patients with symptomatic severe valvular heart disease who are deemed inoperable. The promising results of many nonrandomized series and recent landmark trials have increased the number of percutaneous transcatheter valve procedures in high operative risk patients. Pre-procedural imaging of the anatomy of the aortic or mitral valve and their spatial relationships is crucial to select the most appropriate device or prosthesis and to plan the percutaneous procedure. Multidetector row computed tomography provides 3-dimensional volumetric data sets allowing unlimited plane reconstructions and plays an important role in pre-procedural screening and procedural planning. This review will describe the evolving role of multidetector row computed tomography in patient selection and strategy planning of transcatheter aortic and mitral valve procedures

Normal and abnormal development of the aortic valve and ascending aortic wall: a comprehensive overview of the embryology and pathology of the bicuspid aortic valve

A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most prevalent congenital cardiac anomaly, in which the valve has only two leaflets, instead of the normal three. Patients with a BAV have an increased risk of aneurysm formation and the development of an aortic dissection. Vascular smooth muscle cells in both the non and dilated aortic wall are characterized by a maturation defect in all BAV patients, as compared to patients with a tricuspid aortic valve, which can contribute to inherent developmental susceptibility. Besides structural abnormalities of the vascular wall, a turbulent blood flow, caused by bicuspid valve geometry, could expedite the pathological process in the aortic wall, leading to aortopathy. Although the risk for aortopathy is significant, not all BAV patients experience (acute) aortic complications in their lifespan, highlighting the complexity of the pathogenetic process. Recent studies have focused on the embryonic development of semilunar valves and the ascending aortic wall. Their findings highlight that a defect in the embryogenesis could not only explain the development of a malformed aortic valve but also the increased risk for ascending aorta and arch pathology. This review presents an overview of the normal and abnormal development of the aortic valve and the aortic wall: a common defect in early embryogenesis causes the development of a BAV and associated aortopathy

Normal and abnormal development of the aortic valve and ascending aortic wall: a comprehensive overview of the embryology and pathology of the bicuspid aortic valve

A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most prevalent congenital cardiac anomaly, in which the valve has only two leaflets, instead of the normal three. Patients with a BAV have an increased risk of aneurysm formation and the development of an aortic dissection. Vascular smooth muscle cells in both the non and dilated aortic wall are characterized by a maturation defect in all BAV patients, as compared to patients with a tricuspid aortic valve, which can contribute to inherent developmental susceptibility. Besides structural abnormalities of the vascular wall, a turbulent blood flow, caused by bicuspid valve geometry, could expedite the pathological process in the aortic wall, leading to aortopathy. Although the risk for aortopathy is significant, not all BAV patients experience (acute) aortic complications in their lifespan, highlighting the complexity of the pathogenetic process. Recent studies have focused on the embryonic development of semilunar valves and the ascending aortic wall. Their findings highlight that a defect in the embryogenesis could not only explain the development of a malformed aortic valve but also the increased risk for ascending aorta and arch pathology. This review presents an overview of the normal and abnormal development of the aortic valve and the aortic wall: a common defect in early embryogenesis causes the development of a BAV and associated aortopathy

From macro-effective to microinvasive: what is the right balance?

Thoracic Surger