Comprehensive study of the CuF<inf>2</inf> conversion reaction mechanism in a lithium ion battery

Conversion materials for lithium ion batteries have recently attracted considerable attention due to their exceptional specific capacities. Some metal fluorides, such as CuF2, are promising candidates for cathode materials owing to their high operating potential, which stems from the high electronegativity of fluorine. However, the high ionicity of the metal–fluorine bond leads to a large band gap that renders these materials poor electronic conductors. Nanosizing the active material and embedding it within a conductive matrix such as carbon can greatly improve its electrochemical performance. In contrast to other fluorides, such as FeF2 and NiF2, good capacity retention has not, however, been achieved for CuF2. The reaction mechanisms that occur in the first and subsequent cycles and the reasons for the poor charge performance of CuF2 are studied in this paper via a variety of characterization methods. In situ pair distribution function analysis clearly shows CuF2 conversion in the first discharge. However, few structural changes are seen in the following charge and subsequent cycles. Cyclic voltammetry results, in combination with in situ X-ray absorption near edge structure and ex situ nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, indicate that Cu dissolution is associated with the consumption of the LiF phase, which occurs during the first charge via the formation of a Cu1+ intermediate. The dissolution process consequently prevents Cu and LiF from transforming back to CuF2. Such side reactions result in negligible capacity in subsequent cycles and make this material challenging to use in a rechargeable battery.We acknowledge the funding from the U.S. DOE BES via funding to the EFRC NECCES, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0001294 (support for Rosa Robert and Lin-Shu Du) and EPSRC via the “nanoionics” programme grant (support for Xiao Hua). Use of the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886. Use of the Advanced Photon Source, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory, was supported by the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.This is the final published version of the article. It first appeared at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp503902z and is posted here under the terms of ACS's Editors' Choice scheme (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html)

Eukaryote-wide sequence analysis of mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane proteins

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The outer membranes of mitochondria are thought to be homologous to the outer membranes of Gram negative bacteria, which contain 100's of distinct families of <it>β</it>-barrel membrane proteins (BOMPs) often forming channels for transport of nutrients or drugs. However, only four families of mitochondrial BOMPs (MBOMPs) have been confirmed to date. Although estimates as high as 100 have been made in the past, the number of yet undiscovered MBOMPs is an open question. Fortunately, the recent discovery of a membrane integration signal (the <it>β</it>-signal) for MBOMPs gave us an opportunity to look for undiscovered MBOMPs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present the results of a comprehensive survey of eukaryotic protein sequences intended to identify new MBOMPs. Our search employs recent results on <it>β</it>-signals as well as structural information and a novel BOMP predictor trained on both bacterial and mitochondrial BOMPs. Our principal finding is circumstantial evidence suggesting that few MBOMPs remain to be discovered, if one assumes that, like known MBOMPs, novel MBOMPs will be monomeric and <it>β</it>-signal dependent. In addition to this, our analysis of MBOMP homologs reveals some exceptions to the current model of the <it>β</it>-signal, but confirms its consistent presence in the C-terminal region of MBOMP proteins. We also report a <it>β</it>-signal independent search for MBOMPs against the yeast and Arabidopsis proteomes. We find no good candidates MBOMPs in yeast but the Arabidopsis results are less conclusive.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results suggest there are no remaining MBOMPs left to discover in yeast; and if one assumes all MBOMPs are <it>β</it>-signal dependent, few MBOMP families remain undiscovered in any sequenced organism.</p