Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on relevant treatment outcomes in depression:qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Although symptomatic remission is considered the optimal outcome in depression, this is not always achieved. Furthermore, symptom indicators do not fully capture patients' and clinicians' perspectives on remission. Broader indicators of (partial) remission from depression should be considered. AIMS: To investigate relevant outcomes of depression treatment in specialist care from patients' and clinicians' perspectives and to investigate whether these perspectives differ from each other. METHOD: Three focus groups with 11 patients with depression and seven semi-structured interviews with clinicians were conducted exploring their perspectives on remission. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed the transcripts thematically using the phenomenologist approach. RESULTS: Independently, both patients and clinicians perceived the following outcomes relevant: restoring social functioning and interpersonal relations, regaining quality of life and achieving personal goals. All clinicians emphasised symptom reduction and satisfaction with treatment as relevant outcomes, whereas the former was not an obvious theme in patients. Unlike clinicians, patients made a clear distinction between treatment outcomes in first versus recurrent/chronic depression. CONCLUSIONS: Classically defined study outcomes based on symptom resolution only partly reflect issues considered important by patients and clinicians in specialist depression treatment. Incorporating patients' and clinicians' perspectives in the development of measurable end-points makes them more suitable for use in trials and subsequent translation to clinical practice. Furthermore, evaluating patients' perspectives on treatment outcomes helps in the development of tailored interventions according to patients' needs

Differential associations of specific depressive and anxiety disorders with somatic symptoms

AbstractObjectivePrevious studies have shown that depressive and anxiety disorders are strongly related to somatic symptoms, but much is unclear about the specificity of this association. This study examines the associations of specific depressive and anxiety disorders with somatic symptoms, and whether these associations are independent of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders.MethodsCross-sectional data were derived from The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). A total of 2008 persons (mean age: 41.6years, 64.9% women) were included, consisting of 1367 patients with a past-month DSM-diagnosis (established with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview [CIDI]) of depressive disorder (major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder) and/or anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia), and 641 controls. Somatic symptoms were assessed with the somatization scale of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ), and included cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and general symptoms. Analyses were adjusted for covariates such as chronic somatic diseases, sociodemographics, and lifestyle factors.ResultsAll clusters of somatic symptoms were more prevalent in patients with depressive and/or anxiety disorders than in controls (all p<.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that all types of depressive and anxiety disorders were independently related to somatic symptoms, except for dysthymic disorder. Major depressive disorder showed the strongest associations. Associations remained similar after adjustment for covariates.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that depressive and anxiety disorders show strong and partly differential associations with somatic symptoms. Future research should investigate whether an adequate consideration and treatment of somatic symptoms in depressed and/or anxious patients improve treatment outcomes

Multimodal lifestyle intervention using a web-based tool to improve cardiometabolic health in patients with serious mental illness:results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (LION)

Background: Unhealthy lifestyle behaviours contribute to alarming cardiometabolic risk in patients with serious mental illness (SMI). Evidence-based practical lifestyle tools supporting patients and staff in improving patient lifestyle are lacking. Methods: This multi-site randomized controlled pragmatic trial determined the effectiveness of a twelve-month multimodal lifestyle approach, including a web-based tool to improve patients' cardiometabolic health, versus care-as-usual. Using the web tool, nurses (trained in motivational interviewing) assisted patients in assessing their lifestyle behaviours, creating a risk profile and constructing lifestyle goals, which were discussed during fortnightly regular care visits. Twenty-seven community-care and sheltered-living teams were randomized into intervention (N=17) or control (N=10) groups, including 244 patients (140 intervention/104 control, 49.2% male, 46.1 +/- 10.8 years) with increased waist circumference (WC), BMI or fasting glucose. The primary outcomes concerned differences in WC after six and twelve months intervention, while BMI and metabolic syndrome Z-score were secondary outcome measures. Results: General multilevel linear mixed models adjusted for antipsychotic medication showed that differences in WC change between intervention and control were-0.15 cm (95%CI: -2.49; 2.19) after six and -1.03 cm (95%CI: -3.42; 1.35) after twelve months intervention; however, the differences were not statistically significant. No intervention effects were found for secondary outcome measures. The intervention increased patients' readiness to change dietary behaviour. Conclusion: A multimodal web-based intervention facilitating nurses to address lifestyle changes in SMI patients did not improve patient cardiometabolic health. Web-tool use was lower than expected and nurses need more lifestyle coaching knowledge and skills. The type of intervention and delivery mode need optimization to realize effective lifestyle care for SMI patients

Oral S-ketamine effective after deep brain stimulation in severe treatment-resistant depression and extensive comorbidities

This case report describes successful maintenance treatment with oral S-ketamine in a patient with severe depression, who previously was resistant to electroconvulsive therapy and deep brain stimulation, and who also had comorbid psychotic and obsessive compulsive symptoms

Mental health stigma and mental health knowledge in Chinese population:a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the public stigma on mental illness and mental health knowledge (MHK) in China, public stigma and low MHK can negatively affect patients' health and increase the burden of mental disorders on society. This study aimed at investigating the rates of stigma and MHK, the correlates of stigma and MHK, and the association between MHK and stigma among a Chinese population. METHODS: The data is from the Tianjin Mental Health Survey (TJMHS), which involved a large and a representative sample of adult community residents in the Chinese municipality of Tianjin (n = 11,748). In a 12% random subsample (n = 1775) the Perceived Discrimination and Devaluation scale (PDD) and a Mental Health Knowledge Questionnaire (MHKQ) were administered. First, percentages of the responses to the individual items of the PDD and MHKQ were investigated. Second, sociodemographic correlates of PDD and MHK, and the association between stigma and MHK were investigated. RESULTS: We found that a sizable proportion of participants responded that others would hold a negative attitude towards (former) mental patients, especially with regard to engaging in closer personal relationships. Most people were not familiar about the causes, treatments and prevention of mental illness. Resident area, age, education level, Per capita family income and employment status were related to devaluation score and MHKQ score. MHK was negatively associated with public stigma. CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement with regard to levels of public stigma and MHK in China. Providing psychoeducation to improve public MHK could also contribute to reduction of public stigma

Individual and common patterns in the order of symptom improvement during outpatient treatment for major depression

BACKGROUND: Research so far provided few clues on the order in which depressive symptoms typically remit during treatment. This study examined which depressive symptoms improve first, and whether symptoms changed before, simultaneous with, or after the core symptoms of depression (i.e., sad mood, loss of pleasure, and loss of interest). METHODS: Participants were 176 patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) receiving outpatient treatment (a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychological interventions) for depression. Participants filled out the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR) for 16 to 20 consecutive weeks. For each symptom, the timing of onset of a persistent improvement was determined for each single-subject separately. RESULTS: Which symptoms improved first differed markedly across patients. The core depression symptoms improved 1.5 to 2 times more often before (48% - 60%) than after (19% -28%) depressive cognitions ('view of myself' and 'view of the future'), anxiety symptoms ('feeling irritable' and 'feeling anxious / tense') and vegetative symptoms ('loss of energy', 'slowed down', and 'physical energy'). Only improvements in suicidal thoughts were more likely to occur before (46% - 48%) than after (29%) improvements in the depression core symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Not all 'core depression-non-core symptom' combinations could be tested because some symptoms did not improve in a sufficient number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Which improvements mark the start of symptom remission differed between patients. Improvements in the core depression symptoms 'sad mood', 'loss of interest', and 'loss of pleasure' were more likely to occur before than after improvements in non-core symptoms