Cronbach’s alpha (mean inter-item correlation between brackets).

<p>Cronbach’s alpha (mean inter-item correlation between brackets).</p

Spearman correlations between itempairs (item numbers between brackets).

<p>¹In the column ‘Same direction’ bold itempairs refer to negatively formulated items, assessing fatigue.</p

Percentage of large discrepancies (at least three points) between answers on ‘similar’ items.

<p>Example: Crosstab of item 2 (Physically I feel only able to do a little) with item 8 (Physically I can take on a lot).</p><p>() between brackets are scores after recoding, so that higher scores indicate more fatigue for all items.</p>*<p>denote cases with a difference of a least three points between items 2 and 8, (4.4%).</p><p>¹Note that the percentages should not be compared rowwise, but by taking the two rows for each type of fatigue together.</p><p>²In the column ‘Same direction’ bold itempairs refer to negatively formulated items, assessing fatigue.</p

MFI-20 items.

<p>Codes preceding item numbers, referring to subscales:</p><p>a general fatigue.</p><p>b physical fatigue.</p><p>c reduced activity.</p><p>d reduced motivation.</p><p>e mental fatigue.</p><p>+ positively stated.</p><p>Answer categories:</p><p>yes, that is true.</p><p>no, that is not true.</p

Secret neutrino interactions: a pseudoscalar model

Time plan G&G-implementation study

Reports of translated HADS versions used, citations of the Zigmond and Snaith 1983 study and citations of validation studies with non-English HADS versions, by investigators in non-English speaking countries.

**<p>The article(s) did not report the language version of the HADS used.</p

Reports of translated HADS versions used, and of corrective actions and qualifications concerning language and culture in reviews that integrated studies with different language versions of the HADS.

<p>Reports of translated HADS versions used, and of corrective actions and qualifications concerning language and culture in reviews that integrated studies with different language versions of the HADS.</p

Additional file 1: Table S1. of Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice

Patient satisfaction questions. Table S2. Mirror Questions. Table S3. Patients’ perceptions and expectations. Table S4. Results patient satisfaction questions. Table S5. Results: Patients’ perceptions and expectations. (DOCX 24 kb

sj-docx-3-hpq-10.1177_13591053231223838 – Supplemental material for The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregiver’s willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-hpq-10.1177_13591053231223838 for The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregiver’s willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study by Giulia Ferraris, Pierre Gérain, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman and Mariët Hagedoorn in Journal of Health Psychology</p

sj-docx-1-hpq-10.1177_13591053231223838 – Supplemental material for The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregiver’s willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-hpq-10.1177_13591053231223838 for The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregiver’s willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study by Giulia Ferraris, Pierre Gérain, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman and Mariët Hagedoorn in Journal of Health Psychology</p