32 research outputs found

    Transurethral and suprapubic mesh resection after Prolift® bladder perforation: a case report

    Get PDF
    Bladder perforation is a complication which can occur after a Prolift® procedure and may enhance vesicovaginal fistula formation. Different methods of management of bladder perforation caused by mesh procedures are described in the literature, and most authors advise complete excision of the mesh. In the case described in this article, we propose a combined transurethral and suprapubical approach as the optimal method for maximal tape removal, being both minimally invasive and less damaging to the vesical wall. A suprapubical catheter can be removed shortly after surgery to enable optimal tissue healing of the vesical mucosa

    Guideline on urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

    Get PDF
    Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is diagnosed predominantly in people over 60 years of age. The most common symptom is haematuria. Smoking is an important risk factor (relative risk 2.5 to 3). Cystoscopy is performed whenever bladder carcinoma is suspected. The recurrence rate of a non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma is high (31-78% within 5 years). A single intravesical instillation with a chemotherapeutic agent within 24 hours of transurethral resection (TUR) reduces the risk of recurrence. Carcinoma in situ (CIS) should be treated as high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Standard treatment for patients with non-metastasized muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is cystectomy in combination with extensive lymph node dissection. There are several possibilities for urinary diversion following cystectomy, none of which are any better than the others. Bladder-sparing brachytherapy may be used in patients with solitary T1 - T2 urothelial carcinoma &lt; 5 cm. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-containing chemotherapy prior to cystectomy in muscle-invasive carcinoma only slightly improves survival. Cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastasized urothelial carcinoma.</p

    Widespread genomic influences on phenotype in Dravet syndrome, a ‘monogenic’ condition

    Get PDF
    Dravet syndrome is an archetypal rare severe epilepsy, considered “monogenic”, typically caused by loss-of-function SCN1A variants. Despite a recognisable core phenotype, its marked phenotypic heterogeneity is incompletely explained by differences in the causal SCN1A variant or clinical factors. In 34 adults with SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome, we show additional genomic variation beyond SCN1A contributes to phenotype and its diversity, with an excess of rare variants in epilepsy-related genes as a set and examples of blended phenotypes, including one individual with an ultra-rare DEPDC5 variant and focal cortical dysplasia. Polygenic risk scores for intelligence are lower, and for longevity, higher, in Dravet syndrome than in epilepsy controls. The causal, major-effect, SCN1A variant may need to act against a broadly compromised genomic background to generate the full Dravet syndrome phenotype, whilst genomic resilience may help to ameliorate the risk of premature mortality in adult Dravet syndrome survivors

    Laparoscopic Practice Patterns in the Netherlands in 2005

    No full text
    corecore