Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUNDExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) restores perfusion and oxy-genation in a patient who does not have spontaneous circulation. The evidencewith regard to the effect of extracorporeal CPR on survival with a favorable neu-rologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is inconclusive.METHODSIn this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, weassigned patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive extracorporealCPR or conventional CPR (standard advanced cardiac life support). Eligible patientswere between 18 and 70 years of age, had received bystander CPR, had an initialventricular arrhythmia, and did not have a return of spontaneous circulationwithin 15 minutes after CPR had been initiated. The primary outcome was sur-vival with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral PerformanceCategory score of 1 or 2 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severedisability) at 30 days. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.RESULTSOf the 160 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receiveextracorporeal CPR and 64 to receive conventional CPR; 26 patients who did notmeet the inclusion criteria at hospital admission were excluded. At 30 days, 14 pa-tients (20%) in the extracorporeal-CPR group were alive with a favorable neuro-logic outcome, as compared with 10 patients (16%) in the conventional-CPR group(odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.5; P = 0.52). The number of seri-ous adverse events per patient was similar in the two groups.CONCLUSIONSIn patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal CPR andconventional CPR had similar effects on survival with a favorable neurologic out-come. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Develop-ment and Maquet Cardiopulmonary [Getinge]; INCEPTION ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT03101787.)Cardiolog

Toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphisms show no association with the risk of clinical or angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains an issue even in the drug-eluting stent era. Genetic polymorphisms may provide insight in the pathogenesis of restenosis and may help in the stratification of patients at risk for restenosis. The aim of this study was to examine whether polymorphisms at the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) locus, that are associated with impaired innate immune system and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, were associated with clinical and/or angiographic restenosis after PCI. Methods The GENetic Determinants of Restenosis (GENDER) project was a prospective, multicenter study that enrolled 3146 consecutive patients after successful PCI. Frequencies of the TLR4 896A/G (Asp299Gly; rs4986790) and 1196C/T (Thr399Ile; rs4986791) polymorphisms and haplotypes were assessed. Patients were followed up for 1 year and in a subgroup of 406 patients angiographic follow-up was obtained. Results We included a total of 2682 patients that underwent successful PCI. There was no association between genotypes and the risk of target vessel revascularization at 1-year or late luminal loss at 6-months angiographic follow-up (P = 0.53 and 0.44, respectively). Absence of association with target lesion revascularization and late luminal loss was replicated in the GEnetic risk factors for In-Stent Hyperplasia study Amsterdam (GEISHA) cohort study of 674 patients and in a subgroup of 550 patients with angiographic follow-up available (P = 0.26, and 0.86, respectively). Moreover, in both the studies, no significant differences between haplotypes A/C and G/T were observed for target vessel revascularization at late luminal loss. Conclusion Although inflammation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of restenosis, the 896A/G and 1196C/T polymorphisms or haplotypes based on these polymorphisms at the TLR4 locus are not associated with an increased risk of target vessel revascularization or angiographic restenosis after PCI. These polymorphisms are not useful for pre-PCI identification of patients at risk for restenosis. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 20: 544-552 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Vascular Biology and Interventio

Inter-ethnic differences in quantified coronary artery disease severity and all- cause mortality among Dutch and singaporean percutaneous coronary intervention patients

10.1371/journal.pone.0131977PLoS ONE107e013197

Early initiation of extracorporeal life support in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Design and rationale of the INCEPTION trial

Background Return of spontaneous circulation occurs in less than 10% of patients with cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for more than 15 minutes. Studies suggest that extracorporeal life support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves survival rate in these patients. These studies, however, are hampered by their non-randomized, observational design and are mostly single-center. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial is urgently warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR.Hypothesis We hypothesize that early initiation of ECPR in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) improves the survival rate with favorable neurological status.Study design The INCEPTION trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter trial that will randomly allocate 110 patients to either continued CPR or ECPR in a 1: 1 ratio. Patients eligible for inclusion are adults (<= 70 years) with witnessed OHCA presenting with an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), who received bystander basic life support and who fail to achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical services. The primary endpoint of the study is 30-day survival rate with favorable neurological status, defined as 1 or 2 on the Cerebral Performance Category score. The secondary endpoints include 3, 6 and 12-month survival rate with favorable neurological status and the cost-effectiveness of ECPR compared to CCPR.Summary The INCEPTION trial aims to determine the clinical benefit for the use of ECPR in patients with refractory OHCA presenting with VF/VT. Additionally, the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of ECPR will be evaluated.Cardiolog

Early initiation of extracorporeal life support in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Design and rationale of the INCEPTION trial

Return of spontaneous circulation occurs in less than 10% of patients with cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for more than 15 minutes. Studies suggest that extracorporeal life support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves survival rate in these patients. These studies, however, are hampered by their non-randomized, observational design and are mostly single-center. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial is urgently warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that early initiation of ECPR in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) improves the survival rate with favorable neurological status. Study design: The INCEPTION trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter trial that will randomly allocate 110 patients to either continued CPR or ECPR in a 1:1 ratio. Patients eligible for inclusion are adults (≤ 70 years) with witnessed OHCA presenting with an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), who received bystander basic life support and who fail to achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical services. The primary endpoint of the study is 30-day survival rate with favorable neurological status, defined as 1 or 2 on the Cerebral Performance Category score. The secondary endpoints include 3, 6 and 12-month survival rate with favorable neurological status and the cost-effectiveness of ECPR compared to CCPR. The INCEPTION trial aims to determine the clinical benefit for the use of ECPR in patients with refractory OHCA presenting with VF/VT. Additionally, the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of ECPR will be evaluated.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe