Distribution of baseline and change in percent body fat for LF (top) and LC (bottom) groups

The vertical axes () indicates the number of patients observed within a given 10% interval up to 60% (baseline, left panels) or within a given 2% or 5% interval (change, right panels) on the horizontal axes. Genotyping was not completed in 3 LF subjects and 7 LC subjects.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Physiogenomic comparison of human fat loss in response to diets restrictive of carbohydrate or fat"</p><p>http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/5/1/4</p><p>Nutrition & Metabolism 2008;5():4-4.</p><p>Published online 6 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2270845.</p><p></p

Physiogenomic representation of the most significant genetic associations found in the low carbohydrate group

See Figure 2 legend for details regarding individual patient genotypes (), the distribution of Δ%BF (), and the LOESS fit of the allele frequency () as a function of Δ%BF.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Physiogenomic comparison of human fat loss in response to diets restrictive of carbohydrate or fat"</p><p>http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/5/1/4</p><p>Nutrition & Metabolism 2008;5():4-4.</p><p>Published online 6 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2270845.</p><p></p

PPARα L162V underlies variation in serum triglycerides and subcutaneous fat volume in young males-0

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "PPARα L162V underlies variation in serum triglycerides and subcutaneous fat volume in young males"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/8/55</p><p>BMC Medical Genetics 2007;8():55-55.</p><p>Published online 16 Aug 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2040140.</p><p></p>notypes significantly decreased in fat volume. No significant differences were seen for women. Aged adjusted model