Book Reviews

Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis. By David T.Moore. At The Center Of The Storm: The CIA During America's Time of Crisis. By George Tenet with Bill Harlow. Female Suicide Bombers. By Rosemarie Skaine. Information Operations: Doctrine and Practice. By Christopher Paul. The Secret Sentry: The Untold History of the National Security Agency. By Matthew M. Aid. The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption. By Kamal Saleem with Lynn Vincent. Attaché Extraordinaire: Vernon A. Walters in Brazil. By Frank Márcio De Oliveira

CD34+/M-cadherin+ Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells Promote Arteriogenesis in Ischemic Hindlimbs of ApoE−/− Mice

BACKGROUND: Cell-based therapy shows promise in treating peripheral arterial disease (PAD); however, the optimal cell type and long-term efficacy are unknown. In this study, we identified a novel subpopulation of adult progenitor cells positive for CD34 and M-cadherin (CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs) in mouse and human bone marrow. We also examined the long-lasting therapeutic efficacy of mouse CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs in restoring blood flow and promoting vascularization in an atherosclerotic mouse model of PAD. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Colony-forming cell assays and flow cytometry analysis showed that CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs have hematopoietic progenitor properties. When delivered intra-arterially into the ischemic hindlimbs of ApoE⁻/⁻ mice, CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs alleviated ischemia and significantly improved blood flow compared with CD34⁺/M-cad⁻ BMCs, CD34⁻/M-cad⁺ BMCs, or unselected BMCs. Significantly more arterioles were seen in CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ cell-treated limbs than in any other treatment group 60 days after cell therapy. Furthermore, histologic assessment and morphometric analyses of hindlimbs treated with GFP⁺ CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ cells showed that injected cells incorporated into solid tissue structures at 21 days. Confocal microscopic examination of GFP⁺ CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ cell-treated ischemic legs followed by immunostaining indicated the vascular differentiation of CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ progenitor cells. A cytokine antibody array revealed that CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ cell-conditioned medium contained higher levels of cytokines in a unique pattern, including bFGF, CRG-2, EGF, Flt-3 ligand, IGF-1, SDF-1, and VEGFR-3, than did CD34⁺/M-cad⁻ cell-conditioned medium. The proangiogenic cytokines secreted by CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ cells induced oxygen- and nutrient-depleted endothelial cell sprouting significantly better than CD34⁺/M-cad⁻ cells during hypoxia. CONCLUSION: CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs represent a new progenitor cell type that effectively alleviates hindlimb ischemia in ApoE⁻/⁻ mice by consistently improving blood flow and promoting arteriogenesis. Additionally, CD34⁺/M-cad⁺ BMCs contribute to microvascular remodeling by differentiating into vascular cells and releasing proangiogenic cytokines and growth factors

Security Inequalities in North America: Reassessing Regional Security Complex Theory

This article re-evaluates earlier work done by the authors on Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) in North America, using sectoral analysis initially developed by Buzan and Waever, but also adding the variables of institutions, identity, and interests. These variables are assessed qualitatively in the contemporary context on how they currently impress upon the process of securitization within sectoral relations between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The article reviews the movement from bilateral security relations between these states to the development of a trilateral response to regional security challenges post- 9/11. It further addresses the present period and what appears to be a security process derailed by recent political changes and security inequalities, heightened by the election of Donald Trump in 2016. The article argues that while these three states initially evinced a convergence of regional security interests after 9/11, which did create new institutional responses, under the current conditions, divergence in political interests and security inequalities have reduced the explanatory power of RSCT in North America. Relations between states in North American are becoming less characterized by the role of institutions and interests and more by identity politics in the region

Toward a New Trilateral Strategic Security Relationship: United States, Canada, and Mexico

The term perimeter defense has come back into vogue recently, with regard to security strategies for North America. The United States\u27 concern primarily with the terrorist threat to its homeland subsequent to September 11, 2001 (9/11) is generating this discussion with its immediate neighbors of Mexico and Canada (and to some extent some Caribbean nations—the third border ). The concept is simply that by pushing defenses out to the perimeter nations, then security will be enhanced, since the United States visions itself as more vulnerable to international terrorism than its neighbors. However, Canada and Mexico have not been very happy about the perimeter defined by Washington since 9/11. These nations have sought to define the trilateral relationship beyond just discussions of terrorism to include natural disasters and international organized crime as a component of a broader trilateral agenda. Eight years later these three nations continue to look for some convergence of security interests, although there remains a degree of tension and hesitancy towards achieving a common security agenda in the Western Hemisphere.This article examines the concept of perimeter defense within the context of the new security challenges that the United States, Mexico, and Canada face today. Questions to be addressed in the article include: Do all these nations share the same threat perception? Where exactly is the perimeter? What security arrangements have been tried in the past? What are the prospects for the future for increased security cooperation? The main focus of this article is at the sub-regional level in North America and whether a new trilateral strategic security relationship between the United States, Canada, and Mexico can emerge in North America