42 research outputs found

    作息类型与走神的关系—睡眠质量与一天中不同时间段在其中的影响作用

    No full text
    Human biological functioning and behaviour include regular, 24-hour circadian rhythms,&nbsp; such as shown in body temperature variation and the sleep-wake cycle. However, the expression of&nbsp; these rhythms varies by chronotype: individual differences in time-of-day preference. Although&nbsp; most people do not have strong preferences, morning-type people have relatively early rising and&nbsp; bed times, and feel more alert in the morning, while evening-type people show relatively late&nbsp; tendencies. Chronotype has been associated with a variety of cognitive, behavioural and personality&nbsp; characteristics. One curious characteristic of the human mind is its propensity for wandering:&nbsp; wandering away from an ongoing task, and away from the here and now. Mind wandering episodes&nbsp; can be detrimental to task performance, and yet may also be a place where solutions to problems or&nbsp; creative inspiration can be found; but, what relationship is there, if any, between chronotype and&nbsp; mind wandering? Survey and experimental methods were used to address this question, with a&nbsp; focus on the influences of sleep quality and time-of-day. A series of surveys with Chinese adults&nbsp; (aged 18-87, total N &gt; 2500) included the development of a short questionnaire to assess&nbsp; chronotype, and new translations of several scales to assess mind wandering and related&nbsp; phenomena. It was found that the frequency of mind wandering is associated with evening&nbsp; chronotype: people who have a preference for rising and going to bed at relatively later times, and&nbsp; who feel more alert later in the day, report more mind wandering. In addition, it was found that poor&nbsp; sleep quality is a mediator in this relationship between eveningness and mind wandering; lower&nbsp; positive affect and less conscientiousness were likewise found to be mediators. A moderation effect&nbsp; was also shown whereby the negative correlation between mind wandering frequency and positive&nbsp; affect was stronger in evening-types and neutral-types than in morning-types. Furthermore, some&nbsp; evidence for an association between time-of-day and mind wandering was found. Survey results&nbsp; were mixed, with the majority of participants reporting no time-of-day variation in mind wandering&nbsp; frequency, but many participants reported a peak in the afternoon. In addition, there was also some&nbsp; support for a synchrony effect with more mind wandering at the non-preferred time-of-day&nbsp; (morning for evening-types, and evening for morning-types). However, this effect was especially&nbsp; strong in morning-types, and the corresponding peak in mind wandering during the evening could&nbsp; also support the view that mind wandering is associated with the body temperature circadian&nbsp; rhythm. The experimental research gave some further support for this. Participants completed a&nbsp; sustained attention to response task (SART), and a vigilance task, each of which included thought- probes to assess mind wandering; an attentional blink (AB) task with a questionnaire assessment of&nbsp; mind wandering was also undertaken. Participants completed these tasks twice, in a morning&nbsp; session and an afternoon/evening session. A higher frequency of mind wandering in the&nbsp; afternoon/evening was found in the SART, but this was not found in the vigilance or AB tasks,&nbsp; suggesting that the nature of the task may be an influence on time-of-day variation in mind&nbsp; wandering. Also, although no interaction between chronotype and time-of-day was found for the&nbsp; overall frequency of mind wandering, there was some evidence for a synchrony effect for the&nbsp; experience of involuntary autobiographical memories (morningness associated with reporting more&nbsp; in the afternoon/evening, and eveningness associated with reporting more in the morning). Overall,&nbsp; these studies demonstrate that there is a relationship between mind wandering and chronotype,&nbsp; which involves mediation and moderation effects. Further research may extend the network of&nbsp; related variables and elucidate the basis of their associations.<br /

    Chronotype and time-of-day correlates of mind wandering and related phenomena

    No full text
    This study investigated the associations between morningness/eveningness and the frequency of mind wandering (MW), daydreaming, mindfulness and attention-related cognitive errors. Self-reported time-of-day for the peak occurrence of these phenomena was also studied. A total of 1852 Chinese, aged 18-82, each completed one of several surveys comprised of various combinations of scales. Morningness was negatively correlated with MW, daydreaming and attention-related cognitive errors, and positively correlated with mindfulness. Additionally, more MW, daydreaming and attention-related cognitive errors, and less mindfulness, were generally reported at the non-preferred time-of-day (evening for morning-types, morning for evening-types), although this interaction was especially strong in morning-types. The implications of these findings for theories of MW are discussed

    Mind wandering, sleep quality, affect and chronotype: an exploratory study.

    No full text
    Poor sleep quality impairs cognition, including executive functions and concentration, but there has been little direct research on the relationships between sleep quality and mind wandering or daydreaming. Evening chronotype is associated with poor sleep quality, more mind wandering and more daydreaming; negative affect is also a mutual correlate. This exploratory study investigated how mind wandering and daydreaming are related to different aspects of sleep quality, and whether sleep quality influences the relationships between mind wandering/daydreaming and negative affect, and mind wandering/daydreaming and chronotype. Three surveys (Ns = 213; 190; 270) were completed with Chinese adults aged 18-50, including measures of sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, mind wandering, daydreaming, chronotype and affect (positive and negative). Higher frequencies of mind wandering and daydreaming were associated with poorer sleep quality, in particular with poor subjective sleep quality and increased sleep latency, night-time disturbance, daytime dysfunction and daytime sleepiness. Poor sleep quality was found to partially mediate the relationships between daydreaming and negative affect, and mind wandering and negative affect. Additionally, low positive affect and poor sleep quality, in conjunction, fully mediated the relationships between chronotype and mind wandering, and chronotype and daydreaming. The relationships between mind wandering/daydreaming and positive affect were also moderated by chronotype, being weaker in those with a morning preference. Finally, while daytime sleepiness was positively correlated with daydream frequency, it was negatively correlated with a measure of problem-solving daydreams, indicating that more refined distinctions between different forms of daydreaming or mind wandering are warranted. Overall, the evidence is suggestive of a bi-directional relationship between poor sleep quality and mind wandering/daydreaming, which may be important in attempts to deal with sleep problems and improve sleep quality. These findings and further research on this topic may also have implications for definitions and theories of mind wandering and daydreaming

    Age-related chronotype differences in Chinese, and reliability assessment of a reduced version of the Chinese Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire

    No full text
    There has been a lot of international research on morning/evening preference, but relatively little has been done in mainland China. This study investigated whether the trend for increased morning preference in older adults, which has been a consistent finding in chronotype research in many countries, is also found in Chinese. Using the Chinese translation of the MorningnessEveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), it was found that a sample of 305 Beijing residents, aged 1887, showed a significant correlation between MEQ score and age (r = 0.595), and that participants aged 50+ showed significantly more morning preference compared to younger participants. Additionally, a reliability assessment of the 5-question reduced MEQ (rMEQ) was undertaken. Testretest assessment, involving a separate sample (n= 114), showed significant correlations between rMEQ and MEQ scores (r = 0.768), and between chronotype classifications (r = 0.524), supporting the reliability of the Chinese rMEQ
    corecore