8 research outputs found
Distribution of ovarian cancer affection status among relationship pairs.
<p>Distribution of ovarian cancer affection status among relationship pairs.</p
Distributions of numbers of nuclear families and inheritance vector bit in the 1919 pedigrees.
<p>Distributions of numbers of nuclear families and inheritance vector bit in the 1919 pedigrees.</p
Parameter estimates from segregation analysis of ovarian cancer in 1919 proband-ascertained pedigrees.
†<p>Parameters in square brackets were fixed at the values indicated; <b><sup>‡</sup></b>M indicates Mendelian transmission: τ<sub>AA</sub> = 1.0, τ<sub>AB</sub> = 0.5, τ<sub>BB</sub> = 0.0.</p>§<p>The meaning of γ parameters is as follows: <sup>γ</sup><sub>md</sub> represents mother/daughter residual association; <sup>γ</sup><sub>ss</sub> represents sister/sister residual association; <b><sup>*</sup></b>Parameter hit bound; <b><sup>§</sup></b>No. of independent parameters: (no. of parameters in model) – (no. of parameters fixed at boundary) – (no. of dependent and or fixed parameters); Chi-square is defined as (-2 ln L) of the data under the specific hypothesis minus (−2 ln L) of the data under the general model.</p
Distribution of relationship types in the study sample.
‡<p>Values in parentheses indicate number of dummy individuals used for the purpose of pedigree connections and who were not considered in analysis. These dummies were mostly pedigree founders.</p
Plot showing distributions of number of generations in the 1919 pedigrees.
<p>Plot showing distributions of number of generations in the 1919 pedigrees.</p
Breast and ovarian cancer genotype specific risks for each tSNP by study
<p>1 odds ratio, 2 confidence interval, * compared with common homozygote. Confidence intervals that do not reach or cross 1.00 and P- values<0.05 are in bold type</p
Linkage disequilibrium between the 92 common variants (MAF>0.05) in HapMap CEPH trios.
<p>Each square represents the correlation (r<sup>2</sup>) between each pair of SNPs with darker shades representing stronger LD. Tag SNPs are indicated with those SNPs that failed assay design being shown in grey font.</p
Serous type ovarian cancer genotype specific risks for each tSNP
*<p>compared with common homozygote. Confidence intervals that do not reach or cross 1.00 and P- values<0.05 are in bold type</p