56 research outputs found
How to manage KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Constitutive KRAS signalling drives tumorigenesis across several cancer types. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) activating KRAS mutations occur in ~30% of cases, and the glycine to cysteine substitution at codon 12 (G12C) is the most common KRAS alteration. Although KRAS mutations have been considered undruggable for over 40 years, the recent discovery of allelic-specific KRAS inhibitors has paved the way to personalized cancer medicine for patients with tumours harbouring these mutations. Here, we review the current treatment landscape for patients with advanced NSCLCs harbouring a KRAS G12C mutation, including PD-(L) 1-based therapies and direct KRAS inhibitors as well as sequential treatment options. We also explore the possible mechanisms of resistance to KRAS inhibition and strategies to overcome resistance in patients with KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC
Resumption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy After Immune-Mediated Colitis
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often is suspended because of immune-mediated diarrhea
and colitis (IMDC). We examined the rate of and risk factors for IMDC recurrence after ICI resumption.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study examined patients who resumed ICI therapy after improvement of
IMDC between January 2010 and November 2018. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses
assessed the association of clinical covariates and IMDC recurrence.
RESULTS: Of the 167 patients in our analysis, 32 resumed an anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) agent,
and 135 an anti–programmed cell death 1 or ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) agent. The median age was 60 years
(interquartile range [IQR], 50-69 years). The median duration from IMDC to restart of ICI treatment was 49 days
(IQR, 23-136 days). IMDC recurred in 57 patients (34%) overall (44% of those receiving an anti–CTLA-4 and
32% of those receiving an anti–PD-1/L1); 47 of these patients (82%) required immunosuppressive therapy for
recurrent IMDC, and all required permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. The median duration from ICI
resumption to IMDC recurrence was 53 days (IQR, 22-138 days). On multivariable logistic regression, patients
who received anti–PD-1/L1 therapy at initial IMDC had a higher risk of IMDC recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 3.45;
95% CI, 1.59 to 7.69; P = .002). Risk of IMDC recurrence was higher for patients who required immunosuppression for initial IMDC (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 9.62; P = .019) or had a longer duration of IMDC
symptoms in the initial episode (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P = .031). Risk of IMDC recurrence was lower
after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 therapy than after resumption of anti–CTLA-4 therapy (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11
to 0.81; P = .019).
CONCLUSION: One third of patients who resumed ICI treatment after IMDC experienced recurrent IMDC. Recurrence of IMDC was less frequent after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 than after resumption of anti–CTLA-
miRNAs and resistance to EGFR—TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: beyond ‘traditional mechanisms’ of resistance
Understanding molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that target PD-1/PD-L1 have recently emerged as an integral component of front-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC patients. The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved as monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1% and in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression level. However, responses to either regimen occur in only a minority of cases, and PD-L1 TPS is limited as a biomarker in predicting whether a cancer will respond to PD-1 inhibition alone or would be more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy. Additional biomarkers of immunotherapy efficacy, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), have not been incorporated into routine clinical practice for treatment selection. The identification of patients who have the greatest likelihood of responding to immunotherapies is critical for guiding treatment decisions. IN addition, early indicators of response could theoretically prevent patients from staying on an ineffective therapy where they might experience complications due to disease progression or develop toxicities from unnecessary exposure to an inactive agent. The aim of this research project is to investigate the clinicopathologic and molecular determinant of response/resistance to the currently available immune checkpoint inhibitors, in order to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be exploited to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC
Afatinib in the first-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: clinical evidence and experience
Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) gene mutations identify a molecularly defined subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who display an excellent sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). First-generation reversible EGFR TKIs, gefitinib and erlotinib have been proven to improve the objective response rate and to prolong the progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy in large phase III trials. Unfortunately, virtually all patients develop resistance to treatment, usually within 9–12 months. Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family inhibitor initially designed to overcome the development of resistance. Compared with gefitinib in a first-line setting, afatinib prolonged progression-free survival and time to treatment failure, without impacting on overall survival in the general population of EGFR -mutant patients. However, afatinib has been shown to prolong overall survival in the subset of patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion compared with chemotherapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical evidence available to date and to critically discuss the place in therapy of afatinib in the rapidly expanding landscape of EGFR -mutant NSCLC first-line therapy
The Anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein-1/ Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Me-Too Drugs Tsunami: Hard To Be Millennials Among Baby Boomers
Immune-Related Thyroiditis in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Imaging Features and Clinical Implications
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and the immune-related adverse events involving many organs have been recognized. This article investigated the incidence and imaging characteristics of immune-related thyroiditis in NSCLC patients and correlated the findings with clinical features. A total of 534 NSCLC patients treated with ICI were included. Imaging findings indicative of thyroiditis included changes in morphology and attenuation on restaging chest CT scans and FDG uptake on PET/CT during ICI therapy. Fifty patients (9.4%) had imaging findings indicative of thyroiditis. The median time to onset was 9.5 weeks (range: 0.9–87.4 weeks). The most common finding was diffuse hypoattenuation of the gland (72%), with enlargement in 15 and atrophy in 12 patients. Heterogeneous attenuation of the gland was noted in 12 patients (24%), with enlargement in 7 and atrophy in 1 patient. Two patients (4%) showed increased FDG uptake in the gland on PET/CT without changes in the CT scan. Twenty-two patients who had both clinical and radiologic diagnoses of thyroiditis were more frequently managed with hormone replacement than those with thyroiditis without an imaging abnormality (p < 0.0001). Therefore, awareness of the imaging findings of immune-related thyroiditis may alert clinicians to the presence of clinically relevant thyroiditis
Identification of EML4-ALK Rearrangement and MET Exon 14 R988C Mutation in a Patient with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Lung Carcinoma Who Experienced a Lazarus Response to Crizotinib
Osimertinib in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: rationale, evidence and place in therapy
The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations represented a fundamental step forward in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as they define a subset of patients who benefit from the administration of specifically designed targeted therapies. The inhibition of mutant EGFR through EGFR -tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), either reversible, first-generation gefitinib and erlotinib, or irreversible, second-generation afatinib, has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients harboring this specific genetic alteration, leading to unexpected clinical benefit. Unfortunately, virtually all patients who initially respond to treatment develop acquired resistance to EGFR -TKIs within 9–14 months. The EGFR T790M secondary mutation has emerged as a cause of treatment failure in approximately 60% of resistant cases. To date, several compounds designed with the aim to overcome T790M-mediated resistance are under clinical investigation. The aim of this review is to discuss emerging data regarding the third-generation EGFR -TKI, osimertinib, for the treatment of EGFR T790M mutant advanced NSCLC
- …