10 research outputs found
Agreement of small pulmonary nodule measurements.
<p>Bland-Altman plots of CT measured nodule volume at filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (iDose<sup>4</sup> level 2 (A), 4 (B) and 6 (C)) for small nodules. The horizontal axis shows the mean value of the measured nodule volume with FBP and iterative reconstruction. The vertical axis shows the difference between the measured nodule volume with FBP and iterative reconstruction. <i>FBP</i> Filtered back projection; <i>L2</i> Level 2; <i>L4</i> Level 4; <i>L6</i> Level 6.</p
Intra-observer and inter-observer variability.
<p>P-values and concordance correlation coefficients (p<sub>c</sub>-values) of measured pulmonary nodule volumes using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (iDose<sup>4</sup> level 2, 4 and 6) by two observers.</p><p><i>p-value</i> Based on Wilcoxon signed ranks test; <i>p<sub>c</sub>-value</i> Concordance correlation coefficient; <i>FBP</i> Filtered back projection; <i>L2</i> Level 2; <i>L4</i> Level 4; <i>L6</i> Level 6; <i>Observer 1–1</i> First measurement by first observer; <i>Observer 1–2</i> Second measurement by first observer; <i>Observer 2</i> Measurement by second observer.</p
Results of pulmonary nodule measurements.
<p>CT measured pulmonary nodule volumes using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (iDose<sup>4</sup> level 2, 4 and 6). Values are presented as medians with interquartile range.</p><p><i>p-value</i> Based on Wilcoxon signed ranks test; <i>FBP</i> Filtered back projection; <i>L2</i> Level 2; <i>L4</i> Level 4; <i>L6</i> Level 6; <i>NS</i> Not significant.</p
Axial CT images of a small pulmonary nodule.
<p>Measured volumes were 112.2 mm<sup>3</sup> (A, FBP), 113.2 mm<sup>3</sup> (B, iDose<sup>4</sup> level 2), 113.5 mm<sup>3</sup> (C, iDose<sup>4</sup> level 4), and 115.1 mm<sup>3</sup> (D, iDose<sup>4</sup> level 6).</p
Agreement of large pulmonary nodule measurements.
<p>Bland-Altman plots of CT measured nodule volume at filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (iDose<sup>4</sup> level 2 (A), 4 (B) and 6 (C)) for large nodules. The horizontal axis shows the mean value of the measured nodule volume with FBP and iterative reconstruction. The vertical axis shows the difference between the measured nodule volume with FBP and iterative reconstruction. <i>FBP</i> Filtered back projection; <i>L2</i> Level 2; <i>L4</i> Level 4; <i>L6</i> Level 6.</p
Revista do Ensino, 1926, anno 2, n. 11 , fev., MG.
Revista do Ensino disponível no Arquivo Público Mineiro, disponibilizada pelo link http://www.siaapm.cultura.mg.gov.br/modules/gravata/brtacervo.php?cid=28248&op=1Esta revista é publicação da Secretaria de Educação Minas Gerais. A Revista apresenta os seguintes artigos em destaque: p. 37: Um Typo interessante de escola livre e experimental; p. 41: Uma lição de Arithmética; p. 46: Um modelo para facilitar o trabalho dos professores; p. 55: O trabalho intelligente do mestre; p. 63: Methodo prático de ensinar
Example of the stents acquired with different protocols: routine dose (195 mAs, 100kV), low dose (195 mAs, 80kV), low dose (80mAs, 80kV).
<p>Example of the stents acquired with different protocols: routine dose (195 mAs, 100kV), low dose (195 mAs, 80kV), low dose (80mAs, 80kV).</p
Noise per dose level for FBP and IR.
<p>The white boxes represent the noise with FBP, while the gray boxes represent the noise with IR. IR resulted in a decrease in noise compared to FBP at the same dose level. <i>FBP Filtered Back Projection</i>, <i>IR Iterative Reconstruction</i></p
Phantom set-up.
<p>A plastic holder containing a stent with inside a balloon (left upper image) was placed into an anthropomorphic chest phantom (right upper image, bottom image) [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0175714#pone.0175714.ref002" target="_blank">2</a>].</p
Subjective image quality scores.
<p>Scores are displayed as median [interquartile range]. No significant differences compared to FBP at routine dose were observed. <i>1 poor</i>, <i>non-diagnostic image quality</i>, <i>2 moderate</i>, <i>limited diagnostic value</i>, <i>3 good</i>, <i>diagnostic image quality</i>, <i>4 excellent</i>, <i>excellent image quality</i></p