Oligosarcomas, IDH-mutant are distinct and aggressive

Oligodendrogliomas are defined at the molecular level by the presence of an IDH mutation and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. In the past, case reports and small studies described gliomas with sarcomatous features arising from oligodendrogliomas, so called oligosarcomas. Here, we report a series of 24 IDH-mutant oligosarcomas from 23 patients forming a distinct methylation class. The tumors were recurrences from prior oligodendrogliomas or developed de novo. Precursor tumors of 12 oligosarcomas were histologically and molecularly indistinguishable from conventional oligodendrogliomas. Oligosarcoma tumor cells were embedded in a dense network of reticulin fibers, frequently showing p53 accumulation, positivity for SMA and CALD1, loss of OLIG2 and gain of H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) as compared to primary lesions. In 5 oligosarcomas no 1p/19q codeletion was detectable, although it was present in the primary lesions. Copy number neutral LOH was determined as underlying mechanism. Oligosarcomas harbored an increased chromosomal copy number variation load with frequent CDKN2A/B deletions. Proteomic profiling demonstrated oligosarcomas to be highly distinct from conventional CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas with consistent evidence for a smooth muscle differentiation. Expression of several tumor suppressors was reduced with NF1 being lost frequently. In contrast, oncogenic YAP1 was aberrantly overexpressed in oligosarcomas. Panel sequencing revealed mutations in NF1 and TP53 along with IDH1/2 and TERT promoter mutations. Survival of patients was significantly poorer for oligosarcomas as first recurrence than for grade 3 oligodendrogliomas as first recurrence. These results establish oligosarcomas as a distinct group of IDH-mutant gliomas differing from conventional oligodendrogliomas on the histologic, epigenetic, proteomic, molecular and clinical level. The diagnosis can be based on the combined presence of (a) sarcomatous histology, (b) IDH-mutation and (c) TERT promoter mutation and/or 1p/19q codeletion, or, in unresolved cases, on its characteristic DNA methylation profile. Keywords: 1p/19q; Codeletion; DNA methylation; Gliosarcoma; NF1; Oligodendroglioma; Oligosarcoma; Prognosis; SMA; Subtype; TERT; TP53; Type; Variant; YAP1

Venous thromboembolic events in glioblastoma patients: An epidemiological study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are a major complication in cancer patients, and therefore, also in brain cancer patients, anticoagulants are considered appropriate in the treatment of VTEs. METHODS Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of VTEs, as well as associated complications, were assessed in a population-based cohort of glioblastoma patients in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Correlations between clinical data and survival were retrospectively analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression models. RESULTS Four hundred fourteen glioblastoma patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type status were identified. VTEs were documented in 65 patients (15.7%). Median time from tumor diagnosis to the occurrence of a VTE was 1.8 months, and 27 patients were diagnosed with VTEs postoperatively (within 35 days; 42.2%). History of a prior VTE was more common in patients who developed VTEs than in those who did not (p = 0.004). Bevacizumab treatment at any time during the disease course was not associated with occurrence of VTEs (p = 0.593). Most patients with VTEs (n = 61, 93.8%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. Complications occurred in 14 patients (23.0%), mainly intracranial hemorrhages (n = 7, 11.5%). Overall survival did not differ between patients diagnosed with VTEs and those who had no VTE (p = 0.139). Tumor progression was the major cause of death (n = 283, 90.7%), and only three patients (1.0%) died in association with acute VTEs. CONCLUSIONS Venous thromboembolic events occurred early in the disease course, suggesting that the implementation of primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during first-line chemoradiotherapy could be explored in a randomized setting

Antidepressant drug use in glioblastoma patients: an epidemiological view.

Background: Antidepressant drugs have shown antitumor activity in preclinical glioblastoma studies. Antidepressant drug use, as well as its association with survival, in glioblastoma patients has not been well characterized on a population level. Methods: Patient characteristics, including the frequency of antidepressant drug use, were assessed in a glioblastoma cohort diagnosed in a 10-year time frame between 2005 and 2014 in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied for multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) data and the log-rank test was performed for comparisons. Results: A total of 404 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma were included in this study. Sixty-five patients (16.1%) took antidepressant drugs at some point during the disease course. Patients were most commonly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors at any time (N = 46, 70.8%). Nineteen patients (29.2%) were on antidepressant drugs at the time of their tumor diagnosis. No differences were observed in OS between those patients who had taken antidepressants at some point in their disease course and those who had not (P = .356). These data were confirmed in a multivariate analysis including age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), sex, extent of resection, O$^{6}$-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and first-line treatment as cofounders (P = .315). Also, there was no association of use of drugs modulating voltage-dependent potassium channels (citalopram; escitalopram) with survival (P = .639). Conclusions: This signal-seeking study does not support the hypothesis that antidepressants have antitumor efficacy in glioblastoma on a population level

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO–ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Central nervous system; Clinical practice guideline; NeurologicalSistema nerviós central; Guia de pràctica clínica; NeurològicSistema nervioso central; Guía de práctica clínica; NeurológicoThis Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours

Associations of levetiracetam use with the safety and tolerability profile of chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most frequently used antiepileptic drugs (AED) for brain tumor patients with seizures. We hypothesized that toxicity of LEV and temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy may overlap. Methods Using a pooled cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma included in clinical trials prior to chemoradiotherapy (CENTRIC, CORE, AVAglio) or prior to maintenance therapy (ACT-IV), we tested associations of hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, fatigue, and psychiatric adverse events during concomitant and maintenance treatment with the use of LEV alone or with other AED versus other AED alone or in combination versus no AED use at the start of chemoradiotherapy and of maintenance treatment. Results Of 1681 and 2020 patients who started concomitant chemoradiotherapy and maintenance temozolomide, respectively, 473 and 714 patients (28.1% and 35.3%) were treated with a LEV-containing regimen, 538 and 475 patients (32.0% and 23.5%) with other AED, and 670 and 831 patients (39.9% and 41.1%) had no AED. LEV was associated with higher risk of psychiatric adverse events during concomitant treatment in univariable and multivariable analyses (RR 1.86 and 1.88, P < .001) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, or fatigue. LEV was associated with reduced risk of nausea or emesis during maintenance treatment in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.80, P = .017) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, fatigue, or psychiatric adverse events. Conclusions LEV is not associated with reduced tolerability of chemoradiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma regarding hematologic toxicity and fatigue. Antiemetic properties of LEV may be beneficial during maintenance temozolomide

Romiplostim for temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia in glioblastoma: The PLATUM trial

OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim for the prevention of temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS In the PLATUM phase II open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial, patients diagnosed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during chemoradiotherapy received weekly subcutaneous romiplostim injections. PLATUM aimed at demonstrating that the percentage of thrombocytopenic patients treated with romiplostim able to complete 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy exceeded 10% (0 = 0.10; A = 0.35). Using type I error equal to 0.05% and 95% power, 31 patients had to be recruited. According to a Fleming 2-step design with a preplanned interim analysis after recruitment of 20 patients (step 1), the trial was terminated early for success. RESULTS Twenty patients were enrolled in step 1. Median age was 61 years (range 33-73). Twelve patients received 6 temozolomide cycles, corresponding to a success rate of 60% (95% confidence interval 36%-81%). Four patients discontinued temozolomide because they did not respond to romiplostim, 2 for progression, and 2 for adverse events unrelated to romiplostim. CONCLUSION The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim improves exposure to chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma experiencing temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT02227576. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with glioblastoma and thrombocytopenia, romiplostim is effective for the secondary prophylaxis of temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia

Postoperative progression of brain metastasis is associated with seizures

Seizures in patients with brain metastases have an impact on morbidity and quality of life. The influence of tumor growth on the risk of seizures in these patients is not well defined. In this cohort study, we evaluated adult patients from the University Hospital of Zurich following resection of brain metastases from solid tumors, with or without preoperative seizures, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was assessed for tumor progression using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. The quarterly risk of unprovoked seizures was modeled with mixed effects logistic regression. We analyzed 444 time frames in 220 patients. Progression of brain metastases was independently associated with seizures during the respective quarterly follow-up period (odds ratio = 3.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-11.3, p = .014). Complete resection of brain metastases was associated with a lower risk of seizures (odds ratio = .2, 95% confidence interval = .04-.7, p = .015). Postoperative progression of brain metastases quadrupled the risk of seizures; therefore, vigorous follow-up may be useful to identify tumor progression and gauge the risk of seizures. The identification of patients at high seizure risk may have implications for treatment decisions and influence aspects of daily life. Breakthrough seizures may indicate brain metastases progression

Maximal surgical tumour load reduction in immune-checkpoint inhibitor naïve patients with melanoma brain metastases correlates with prolonged survival

Background: Recent therapeutic advances in metastatic melanoma have led to improved overall survival (OS) rates, with consequently an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM). The role of BM resection in the era of targeted and immunotherapy should be reassessed. In the current study we analysed the role of residual intracranial tumour load in a cohort of melanoma BM patients. Methods: Retrospective single-centre analysis of a prospective registry of resected melanoma BM from 2013 to 2021. Correlations of residual tumour volume and outcome were determined with respect to patient, tumour and treatment regimens characteristics. Results: 121 individual patients (66% male, mean age 59.9 years) were identified and included in the study. Pre- and postoperative systemic treatments included BRAF/MEK inhibitors, as well as combination or monotherapy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Median OS of the entire cohort was 20 months. Cox proportional-hazard analysis revealed postoperative anti-CTLA4+anti-PD-1 therapy (HR 0.07, p = .01) and postoperative residual intracranial tumour burden (HR 1.4, p = .027) as significant predictors for OS. Further analysis revealed that ICI-naïve patients with residual tumour volume ≤3.5 cm3 and postoperative ICI showed significantly prolonged OS compared to patients with residual volume &gt;3.5 cm3 (p &lt; .0001). Subgroup analysis of ICI-naïve patients showed steroid intake postoperatively to be negatively associated with OS, however residual tumour volume ≤3.5 cm3 remained independently correlated with superior OS (HR 0.14, p &lt; .001). Conclusion: Besides known predictive factors like postoperative ICI, a maximal intracranial tumour burden reduction seems to be beneficial, especially in ICI-naïve patients. This highlights the importance of local CNS control and the need to further investigating the role of initial surgical tumour load reduction in randomised clinical trials. Keywords: Brain metastases; Extent of resection; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Tumour residua

Glioblastoma in the oldest old: Clinical characteristics, therapy, and outcome in patients aged 80 years and older

Background: Incidence rates of glioblastoma in very old patients are rising. The standard of care for this cohort is only partially defined and survival remains poor. The aims of this study were to reveal current practice of tumor-specific therapy and supportive care, and to identify predictors for survival in this cohort. Methods: Patients aged 80 years or older at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis were retrospectively identified in 6 clinical centers in Switzerland and France. Demographics, clinical parameters, and survival outcomes were annotated from patient charts. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify parameters associated with survival. Results: Of 107 patients, 45 were diagnosed by biopsy, 30 underwent subtotal resection, and 25 had gross total resection. In 7 patients, the extent of resection was not specified. Postoperatively, 34 patients did not receive further tumor-specific treatment. Twelve patients received radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, but only 2 patients had maintenance temozolomide therapy. Fourteen patients received temozolomide alone, 35 patients received radiotherapy alone, 1 patient received bevacizumab, and 1 took part in a clinical trial. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.2 months. Among patients who received any postoperative treatment, median PFS was 3.9 months and median OS was 7.2 months. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70%, gross total resection, and combination therapy were associated with better outcomes. The median time spent hospitalized was 30 days, accounting for 23% of the median OS. End-of-life care was mostly provided by nursing homes (n = 20; 32%) and palliative care wards (n = 16; 26%). Conclusions: In this cohort of very old patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, a large proportion was treated with best supportive care. Treatment beyond surgery and, in particular, combined modality treatment were associated with longer OS and may be considered for selected patients even at higher ages