Personalized Lung Cancer Screening – Acceptability among Primary Care Providers

https://openworks.mdanderson.org/sumexp22/1065/thumbnail.jp

Supplemental Table 3 from Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

Supplemental Table 3 shows a logistic regression analysis investigating various provider characteristics (age, gender, race, profession, years in practice, patients per week, work in a residency training site, work setting) as they influence responses to the question of whether or not providers consider increased time requirement as a barrier to personalized lung cancer screening implementation.</p

Supplemental Table 4 from Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

Supplemental Table 4 shows provider level of agreement between 3 different proposed uses of biomarkers for lung cancer screening: as an adjuvant to the current screening, as a standalone means of screening, or as a guide to uncertain findings to the current screening methods.</p

Supplemental Table 2 from Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

Supplemental Table 2 shows a logistic regression analysis investigating various provider characteristics (age, gender, race, profession, years in practice, patients per week, work in a residency training site, work setting) as they influence responses to the question of whether or not providers recommend lung cancer screening for eligible patients.</p

Supplemental Table 1 from Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

Supplemental Table 1. Respondent demographics</p

Supplemental Methods 1 from Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

Supplemental Methods 1: Survey</p