2 research outputs found

    Defining biological thresholds associated to plant water status for monitoring water restriction effects: Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis recovery as key indicators in potato.

    No full text
    The definition of irrigation schedules depends on the understanding of the response of key plant traits to different water restriction characteristics with the aim to avoid physiological impairment. In this study, different timings (at tuber initiation and bulking) and intensities (four soil moisture levels) of water restriction were tested in the potato crop. The temporal patterns of mid-morning or maximum, light saturated stomatal conductance (gs_max), recovery of net photosynthesis (Arecovery), stem water potential ( stem), carbon isotope discrimination in tubers ( tuber), plant water concentration (PWC), photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and crop water stress index (CWSI) were analyzed. Early-severe water restriction caused a drastic yield reduction, with low recovery of physiological responses (gs_max, tuber, stem, CWSI, Arecovery) after 15 days of post-restriction irrigation and even a continued reduction of some of them (PWC, PRI). It also caused a prolonged gs_max reduction below 0.05 mol H2O m-2 s-1 (˜ 5 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 of net photosynthesis) suggesting that this value defines a physiological severity threshold in potato, under which a metabolic impairment occurs. CWSI and PRI showed a close linear (R2 = 0.76) and no linear (natural logarithm function, R2 = 0.67) relationship with gs_max respectively. In cloudless dry environments, irrigation schedules in potato should aim to avoiding CWSI values higher than 0.4, especially until before of maximum canopy cover establishment. A close relationship between Arecovery at maximum stress moment and yield reduction was found. The strong relationship between the measured traits (except PWC and stem) and final yield at maximum stress moment found in the present study warrants further research on drought phenotyping immediately before post-restriction irrigation or when the defined severity threshold in potato is reached

    Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    No full text
    This paper is the outcome of a community initiative to identify major unsolved scientific problems in hydrology motivated by a need for stronger harmonisation of research efforts. The procedure involved a public consultation through online media, followed by two workshops through which a large number of potential science questions were collated, prioritised, and synthesised. In spite of the diversity of the participants (230 scientists in total), the process revealed much about community priorities and the state of our science: a preference for continuity in research questions rather than radical departures or redirections from past and current work. Questions remain focused on the process-based understanding of hydrological variability and causality at all space and time scales. Increased attention to environmental change drives a new emphasis on understanding how change propagates across interfaces within the hydrological system and across disciplinary boundaries. In particular, the expansion of the human footprint raises a new set of questions related to human interactions with nature and water cycle feedbacks in the context of complex water management problems. We hope that this reflection and synthesis of the 23 unsolved problems in hydrology will help guide research efforts for some years to come
    corecore