Semantic judgment task.

<p>Mean RTs (2a) and percentage of accuracy (2b) by group for each test session (S1-S8) and for the delayed test. Vertical bars indicate standard error. Note that y-axes do not start from 0.</p

Word-Picture verification task.

<p>Mean RTs (1a) and percentage of accuracy (1b) by group for each test session (S1-S8) and for the delayed test. Vertical bars indicate standard error. Note that y-axes do not start from 0.</p

Timelines for the two Experiments.

<p>A) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116541#sec002" target="_blank">Experiment 1</a>, the sequence of events in the Modified Dictator Game. B) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116541#sec003" target="_blank">Experiment 2</a>, the sequence of the events in the Modified Ultimatum Game.</p

Results from Experiment 2.

<p>Both groups were able to apply the regulatory strategies. However, meditators outperformed controls when applying the experiential strategy (mindful detachment) (Panel A, B). Notably, the duration of training correlated with the ability to apply the experiential strategy (Panel C), thus confirming the effect of experiential rather than cognitive strategy as an effect of mindfulness practice.</p

Rejection rates of Experiment 2.

<p>Rejection rates of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116541#sec003" target="_blank">Experiment 2</a>.</p

Physiological results.

<p>Skin conductance analyses confirmed a baseline difference between meditators and controls in terms of reduced physiological reactivity.</p

Results from Experiment 1.

<p>Both groups were able to regulate their emotions in terms of arousal (Panel A) and valence (Panel B). Collapsing for offers and strategies, meditators showed a lesser emotional reactivity (lower arousal, Panel C, left) and more pleasant emotions (higher valence, Panel C, right).</p

PeressottiOpenPracticesDisclosure – Supplemental material for Spatial Congruency Effects Exist, Just Not for Words: Looking Into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008)

<p>Supplemental material, PeressottiOpenPracticesDisclosure for Spatial Congruency Effects Exist, Just Not for Words: Looking Into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008) by Anna Petrova, Eduardo Navarrete, Caterina Suitner, Simone Sulpizio, Michael Reynolds, Remo Job and Francesca Peressotti in Psychological Science</p

PeressottiSupplementalMaterial – Supplemental material for Spatial Congruency Effects Exist, Just Not for Words: Looking Into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008)

<p>Supplemental material, PeressottiSupplementalMaterial for Spatial Congruency Effects Exist, Just Not for Words: Looking Into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008) by Anna Petrova, Eduardo Navarrete, Caterina Suitner, Simone Sulpizio, Michael Reynolds, Remo Job and Francesca Peressotti in Psychological Science</p

Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)

The attentional spatial-numerical association of response codes (Att-SNARC) effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd, & Pratt, 2003)—the finding that participants are quicker to detect left-side targets when the targets are preceded by small numbers and quicker to detect right-side targets when they are preceded by large numbers—has been used as evidence for embodied number representations and to support strong claims about the link between number and space (e.g., a mental number line). We attempted to replicate Experiment 2 of Fischer et al. by collecting data from 1,105 participants at 17 labs. Across all 1,105 participants and four interstimulus-interval conditions, the proportion of times the effect we observed was positive (i.e., directionally consistent with the original effect) was .50. Further, the effects we observed both within and across labs were minuscule and incompatible with those observed by Fischer et al. Given this, we conclude that we failed to replicate the effect reported by Fischer et al. In addition, our analysis of several participant-level moderators (finger-counting habits, reading and writing direction, handedness, and mathematics fluency and mathematics anxiety) revealed no substantial moderating effects. Our results indicate that the Att-SNARC effect cannot be used as evidence to support strong claims about the link between number and space