Time-division SQUID multiplexers with reduced sensitivity to external magnetic fields

Time-division SQUID multiplexers are used in many applications that require exquisite control of systematic error. One potential source of systematic error is the pickup of external magnetic fields in the multiplexer. We present measurements of the field sensitivity figure of merit, effective area, for both the first stage and second stage SQUID amplifiers in three NIST SQUID multiplexer designs. These designs include a new variety with improved gradiometry that significantly reduces the effective area of both the first and second stage SQUID amplifiers.Comment: 4 pages, 7 figures. Submitted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, August 201

Morbidity and complications of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants.

Placement of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often limited because of a lack of supporting bone. A technique to augment the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone graft seems to be a new reliable treatment modality. The morbidity and complication rate of augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor was studied in 75 patients. The sinus floor was augmented with iliac crest (n = 65, 128 sinuses, 276 implants), mandibular symphysis (n = 8, ten sinuses, 21 implants), or maxillary tuberosity grafts (n = 2, two sinuses, two implants). The width of the alveolar crest had to be reconstructed in 52 patients, while in the other 23 patients augmentation and implantation were performed simultaneously. Perforation of the sinus membrane occurred in 45 patients, but this did not predispose them to the development of sinusitis. Loss of bone particles and sequesters were observed in one (diabetic) patient only, in whom a mucosal dehiscence occurred. A second augmentation procedure was successful. Symptoms of transient sinusitis were observed in two of the seven patients with a predisposition for sinusitis. These symptoms were successfully treated with decongestants and antibiotics. One patient developed a purulent sinusitis which resolved after a nasal amrostomy. The bone volume was sufficient for insertion implants in all patients. Twenty of 299 patients (6.7%) in whom Brånemark implants had been inserted were lost to follow-up (mean, 32 months); no sinus pathology was observed. The patients received implant-supported overdentures (58 patients) or fixed bridges (17 patients) and experienced no complaints with regard to the grafts or implants. We conclude that the morbidity and complication rate of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone is low.</p

Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and alveolar ridge for placement of endosseous implants in the edentulous maxilla

Placement of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often restricted because of lack of supporting bone limiting placement of implants of adequate length in a prosthodontically optimal position. There are several surgical procedures to create sufficient volume of bone for the placement of implants. In this paper, a technique is described for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and simultaneous widening of the alveolar crest with autogenous bone.</p

Prosthetic dilemmas. Choice of superstructure for the edentulous maxilla

Patients with an edentulous maxilla can experience problems with a full upper denture. The most common problems are a lack of retention and the stability of the denture, but also other factors, such as an extreme gagging reflex, influence satisfaction. Attachment of a prosthesis on dental implants is a reliable solution to solve or diminish the above mentioned problems. The choice of the kind of superstructure, a removable overdenture or a fixed prosthesis, depends on a variety of factors, such as degree of resorption of the maxilla, cleaning possibilities, patients'wishes and financial possibilities</p

Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and alveolar ridge for placement of endosseous implants in the edentulous maxilla

Placement of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often restricted because of lack of supporting bone limiting placement of implants of adequate length in a prosthodontically optimal position. There are several surgical procedures to create sufficient volume of bone for the placement of implants. In this paper, a technique is described for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and simultaneous widening of the alveolar crest with autogenous bone.</p

Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and alveolar ridge for placement of endosseous implants in the edentulous maxilla

Placement of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often restricted because of lack of supporting bone limiting placement of implants of adequate length in a prosthodontically optimal position. There are several surgical procedures to create sufficient volume of bone for the placement of implants. In this paper, a technique is described for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and simultaneous widening of the alveolar crest with autogenous bone.</p

Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and alveolar ridge for placement of endosseous implants in the edentulous maxilla

Placement of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often restricted because of lack of supporting bone limiting placement of implants of adequate length in a prosthodontically optimal position. There are several surgical procedures to create sufficient volume of bone for the placement of implants. In this paper, a technique is described for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor and simultaneous widening of the alveolar crest with autogenous bone.</p