Don't believe it! A global perspective on cognitive reflection and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic increased the saliency of an old phenomenon – conspiracy theories. In times of a global crisis and an unprecedented access to information, fake news seems to spread as fast as the virus. A global pandemic requires more than ever self-compliance. Only behavior change and vaccination on a large scale can bring us to normality. Yet believing in conspiracy theories about COVID-19 is expected to undermine such compliance. What determines susceptibility to believing in misinformation? In this study, using data on mostly representative samples of 45 countries around the world (38,113 participants), we found evidence that people with more deliberate thinking are less likely to believe in conspiracy theories. Furthermore, on the individual level people who are more prone to believe in conspiracy theories are less likely to comply with behavior change. We are in the midst of the biggest coordination game and such insights in social psychology can inform policymakers

Improving the measurement of prosociality through aggregation of game behavior

Prior research has found that people's choices in economic games are often only modestly related to their prosocial personality traits and to mundane prosocial behaviors. The present article reviews the recent literature showing that the strength of these relationships depends on the level of aggregation. Specifically, we demonstrate an increase in behavioral consistency after horizontal aggregation (across multiple game types), vertical aggregation (across multiple game variants), and a combination thereof. Moreover, we show that aggregation increases the magnitude of the relationships of game behavior with prosocial personality and mundane prosocial behavior. These findings illustrate that economic games can genuinely capture a core facet of human prosociality - but that their capacity for doing so is greater when multiple game behaviors are considered

Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the United States

The COVID-19 mitigation measures require a fundamental shift in human behavior. The present study assesses what factors influence Americans to comply with the stay at home and social distancing measures. It analyzes data from an online survey, conducted on April 3, 2020, of 570 participants from 35 states that have adopted such measures. The results show that while perceptual deterrence was not associated with compliance, people actually comply less when they fear the authorities. Further, two broad processes promote compliance. First, compliance depended on people’s capacity to obey the rules, opportunity to break the rules, and self-control. As such, compliance results from their own personal abilities and the context in which they live. Second, compliance depended on people’s intrinsic motivations, including substantive moral support and social norms. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for ensuring compliance to effectively mitigate the virus

A systematic review and meta-analysis of F-18-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography interpretation methods in vascular graft and endograft infection

OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI) has high morbidity and mortality rates. Diagnosis is complicated since symptoms vary and can be non-specific. A recent meta-analysis identified the use of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET(/CT)) as the most valuable tool for diagnosing VGEI and favorable to computed tomography as the current standard. However, the availability and varied use of several interpretation methods, without consensus on which interpretation method is best, complicates clinical use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different interpretation methods of 18F-FDG PET(/CT) in diagnosing VGEI. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data sources included PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. A meta-analysis was conducted on the different interpretation methods for 18F-FDG PET(/CT) in diagnosing VGEI, including visual FDG uptake intensity, visual FDG uptake pattern, and quantitative SUVmax. RESULTS: Out of 613 articles, 13 were included-10 prospective and 3 retrospective articles. The FDG uptake pattern method (I2 26.2%) showed negligible heterogeneity, while the FDG uptake intensity (I2 42.2%) and SUVmax (I2 42.1%) methods both showed moderate heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity for FDG uptake intensity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96), for uptake pattern 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97), and for the SUVmax method 0.95 (95% CI: 0.76-0.99). The pooled specificity for FDG uptake intensity was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.38-0.78), whereas for FDG uptake pattern it was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88) and for SUVmax it was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63-0.87). The uptake pattern interpretation method demonstrated the best positive and negative post-test probability-82% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis identified the FDG uptake pattern as the most accurate assessment method of 18F-FDG PET(/CT) for diagnosing VGEI. The optimal SUVmax cutoff, depending on the vendor, demonstrated strong sensitivity and moderate specificity

Cooperation in mixed-motive games: the role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation

In mixed-motive games, people must choose between acting upon selfish interests and concerns for others. Yet, the consistency of people’s behavior across these various games is still unclear. If the same conflict between self and others is at the core of all mixed-motive situations, three hypotheses can be stated: (1) behaviors in different mixed-motive games should be substantially related, (2) all these games should substantially appeal to dispositional variables th