Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis Anno 2022

The risk for developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is 1.5 times higher compared to the general population. This risk is partly due to the contribution of systemic inflammation in increased atherogenesis, while an increased prevalence of “traditional” cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is also attributed to nearly 50% of the total CVD risk. Most anti-rheumatic medication partly reduces this CVD risk, primarily by reducing inflammation. The increased risk is recognized by most guidelines, which advise consequent screening and multiplying calculated risk scores by 1.5. However, screening in daily clinical practice is poorly done, and RA patients often have undiagnosed and untreated risk factors. In conclusion, even nowadays, RA patients still have an increased risk of developing CVD. Advances in anti-inflammatory treatment partly mitigate this risk, but RA patients need mandatory screening for CV risk factors to turn their CVD risk towards that of the general population

Effect of anti-inflammatory therapy on vascular biomarkers for subclinical cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of 4 years of anti-inflammatory therapy on markers of subclinical vascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: Carotid intima media thickness (IMT), augmentation index (AIx@75) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were performed repeatedly in 61 RA patients (30 early RA starting with csDMARDs and 31 established RA starting with adalimumab) for 4 years. These markers were also measured in 29 controls with osteoarthritis at baseline (BL). RESULTS: IMT and AIx@75 at BL were higher in RA compared to OA, while PWV was higher in OA. In RA patients, AIx@75 and PWV decreased in the first 6 months after starting anti-inflammatory therapy. At 48 M, the level of AIx@75 remained lower than before therapy, while PWV at 48 M was comparable to BL (AIx@75: BL 28% (95% confidence interval 25-30%), 6 M 23% (20-26%), 48 M 25% (22-28%); PWV: BL 8.5 (7.8-9.2), 6 M 8.0 (7.1-8.9), 48 M 8.6 (7.6-9.6) m/s). IMT remained stable. There was an effect of disease activity (longitudinally, adjusted for changes over time) on IMT, AIx@75 and PWV. CONCLUSION: This study suggests modest beneficial changes in some surrogate markers of subclinical vascular disease after anti-inflammatory therapy. These changes were associated with improvement in disease activity markers. Whether or not these beneficial changes ultimately predict a reduction in clinicalcardiovascular endpoints remains to be established in prospective studies

Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) is common practice in critical care medicine. Complications arising from CVC placement are mostly due to a pneumothorax or malposition. Correct position is currently confirmed by chest x-ray, while ultrasonography might be a more suitable option. We performed a meta-analysis of the available studies with the primary aim of synthesizing information regarding detection of CVC-related complications and misplacement using ultrasound (US). Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016050698). PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Articles which reported the diagnostic accuracy of US in detecting the position of CVCs and the mechanical complications associated with insertion were included. Primary outcomes were specificity and sensitivity of US. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of malposition and pneumothorax, feasibility of US examination, and time to perform and interpret both US and chest x-ray. A qualitative assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results We included 25 studies with a total of 2548 patients and 2602 CVC placements. Analysis yielded a pooled specificity of 98.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8–99.5) and sensitivity of 68.2 (95% CI: 54.4–79.4). US examination was feasible in 96.8% of the cases. The prevalence of CVC malposition and pneumothorax was 6.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The mean time for US performance was 2.83 min (95% CI: 2.77–2.89 min) min, while chest x-ray performance took 34.7 min (95% CI: 32.6–36.7 min). US was feasible in 97%. Further analyses were performed by defining subgroups based on the different utilized US protocols and on intra-atrial and extra-atrial misplacement. Vascular US combined with transthoracic echocardiography was most accurate. Conclusions US is an accurate and feasible diagnostic modality to detect CVC malposition and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Advantages of US over chest x-ray are that it can be performed faster and does not subject patients to radiation. Vascular US combined with transthoracic echocardiography is advised. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution since included studies were often underpowered and had methodological limitations. A large multicenter study investigating optimal US protocol, among other things, is needed

Additional file 1: of Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PRISMA 2009 checklist. An overview of all sections as indicated by the PRISMA guidelines with their corresponding pages in the review. (DOC 63 kb

Additional file 6: of Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ultrasound protocols. An overview of the ultrasonographic techniques used in the various protocols. (DOCX 15 kb

Additional file 5: of Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Qualitative assessment of bias. An overview of the domains defined by QUADAS-2 tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns for each of the included articles. (DOCX 45 kb

Additional file 1: of Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PRISMA 2009 checklist. An overview of all sections as indicated by the PRISMA guidelines with their corresponding pages in the review. (DOC 63 kb

Additional file 3: of Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eligibility and exclusion criteria. An overview of the eligibility and exclusion criteria used in this review. (DOCX 13 kb