GeneWaltz--A new method for reducing the false positives of gene finding

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Identifying protein-coding regions in genomic sequences is an essential step in genome analysis. It is well known that the proportion of false positives among genes predicted by current methods is high, especially when the exons are short. These false positives are problematic because they waste time and resources of experimental studies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We developed GeneWaltz, a new filtering method that reduces the risk of false positives in gene finding. GeneWaltz utilizes a codon-to-codon substitution matrix that was constructed by comparing protein-coding regions from orthologous gene pairs between mouse and human genomes. Using this matrix, a scoring scheme was developed; it assigned higher scores to coding regions and lower scores to non-coding regions. The regions with high scores were considered candidate coding regions. One-dimensional Karlin-Altschul statistics was used to test the significance of the coding regions identified by GeneWaltz.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of false positives among genes predicted by GENSCAN and Twinscan were high, especially when the exons were short. GeneWaltz significantly reduced the ratio of false positives to all positives predicted by GENSCAN and Twinscan, especially when the exons were short.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>GeneWaltz will be helpful in experimental genomic studies. GeneWaltz binaries and the matrix are available online at <url>http://en.sourceforge.jp/projects/genewaltz/</url>.</p

Relationship between amino acid composition and gene expression in the mouse genome

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Codon bias is a phenomenon that refers to the differences in the frequencies of synonymous codons among different genes. In many organisms, natural selection is considered to be a cause of codon bias because codon usage in highly expressed genes is biased toward optimal codons. Methods have previously been developed to predict the expression level of genes from their nucleotide sequences, which is based on the observation that synonymous codon usage shows an overall bias toward a few codons called major codons. However, the relationship between codon bias and gene expression level, as proposed by the translation-selection model, is less evident in mammals.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>We investigated the correlations between the expression levels of 1,182 mouse genes and amino acid composition, as well as between gene expression and codon preference. We found that a weak but significant correlation exists between gene expression levels and amino acid composition in mouse. In total, less than 10% of variation of expression levels is explained by amino acid components. We found the effect of codon preference on gene expression was weaker than the effect of amino acid composition, because no significant correlations were observed with respect to codon preference.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results suggest that it is difficult to predict expression level from amino acid components or from codon bias in mouse.</p

Correspondence. Human Proteinpedia enables sharing of human protein data

4 page(s