A new complimentary web-based tool for manual analysis of microcirculation videos: validation of the capillary mapper against the current gold standard AVA 3.2

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to compare a newly developed web-based freely accessible software program for manual analysis of the microcirculation, the Capillary Mapper (CM), with AVA 3.2 software (AVA; MicroVision Medical B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands), which is the current gold standard for analysis of microcirculation videos. METHODS: A web-based software program was developed, which enables manual analysis of videos of the microcirculation to be carried out according to recommendations of the 2018 consensus conference. A set of 50 high quality microcirculation videos was analyzed with AVA and CM with respect to total vessel density, perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, and the microvascular flow index. RESULTS: Comparison of the mean values derived from manual analysis with CM and AVA revealed no significant differences in microcirculatory variables. Analysis according to Bland and Altman revealed an acceptable bias between manual analysis with the CM and AVA for all variables tested with sufficient limits of agreement. The analysis of intraclass correlation showed "excellent" agreement for all microcirculatory variables analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed CM was successfully validated for manual analyses of microcirculation videos against the current gold standard, the software AVA 3.2

Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify tachycardic patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation following pharmacological heart rate reduction

International audienceBackground: During sepsis, heart rate (HR) reduction could be a therapeutic target, but identification of responders (non-compensatory tachycardia) and non-responders (compensatory for ‘fixed’ stroke volume [SV]) is challenging. We tested the ability of the difference between systolic and dicrotic pressure (SDPdifference), which reflects the coupling between myocardial contractility and a given afterload, in discriminating the origin of tachycardia. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of 45 patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia, we characterised features of haemodynamic response focusing on SDPdifference, classifying patients according to variations in arterial dP/dtmax after 4 h of esmolol administration to maintain HR <95 beats min−1. A cut-off value of 0.9 mm Hg ms−1 was used for group allocation. Results: After reducing HR, arterial dP/dtmax remained above the cut-off in 23 patients, whereas it decreased below the cut-off in 22 patients (from 0.99 [0.37] to 0.63 [0.16] mm Hg ms−1; mean [SD], P<0.001). At baseline, patients with decreased dP/dtmax after esmolol had lower SDPdifference than those with higher dP/dtmax (40 [19] vs 53 [16] mm Hg, respectively; P=0.01). The SDPdifference remained unchanged after esmolol in the higher dP/dtmax group (49 [16] mm Hg), whereas it decreased significantly in patients with lower dP/dtmax (29 [11] mm Hg; P<0.001). In the latter, the HR reduction resulted in a significant cardiac output reduction with unchanged SV, whereas in patients with higher dP/dtmax SV increased (from 48 [12] to 67 [14] ml; P<0.001) with maintained cardiac output. Conclusions: A decrease in SDPdifference could discriminate between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia, revealing a covert loss of myocardial contractility not detected by conventional echocardiographic parameters and deteriorating after HR reduction with esmolol. Clinical trial registration: NCT02188888