4 research outputs found

    Microcellular Foaming of Polymethylmethacrylate in a Batch Supercritical CO2 Process: Effect of Microstructure on Compression Behavior

    Get PDF
    Microcellular foaming of reinforced core/ shell Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was carried out bymeans of supercritical CO2 in a single-step process. Samples were produced using a technique based on the saturation of the polymer under high pressure of CO2(300 bars,40 C), and cellular structure was controlled by varying the depressurization rate from 0.5 bar/s to 1.6 x10-2 bar/sleading to cell sizes from 1lm to 200l m, and densities from 0.8 to 1.0 g/cm3. It was found that the key parameter to control cell size was depressurization rate, and larger depressurization rates generated bigger cell sizes. On the other hand, variation of the density of the samples was not so considerable. Low rate compression tests were carried out, analyzing the dependence of mechanical parameters such as elastic modulus, yield stress and densification strain with cell size. Moreover, the calculation of the energy absorbed for each sample is presented, showing an optimum of energy absorption up to 50% of deformation in the micrometer cellular range (here at a cell size of about 5 ”m). To conclude, a brief comparison between neat PMMA and the core/shell reinforced PMMA has been carried out, analyzing the effect of the core/shell particles in the foaming behavior and mechanical properties

    Production, cellular structure and thermal conductivity of microcellular (methyl methacrylate)–(butyl acrylate)–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers.

    Get PDF
    Microcellular foaming of a (methyl methacrylate)–(butyl acrylate)–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer was carried out by means of supercritical CO2 in a single-step process. The experiments were performed at 40 °C using a pressure of 300 bar (30 MPa) during 24 h. The depressurization times were modified from 2 to 30 min, leading to cell sizes from 10 to 100 ”m, and relative densities from 0.11 to 0.17. It was found that the key parameter to control cell size and density was depressurization time: longer depressurization times generated larger cell sizes and lower densities. The thermal conductivity of these materials was measured using the transient plane source technique, and it was found that this decreased as the density was reduced. Various models for the prediction of thermal conductivity by conduction were tested. It was found that all the models underestimated the experimental results due to a significant contribution of radiation heat flow for these material
    corecore