9 research outputs found
PF-05280014 (a trastuzumab biosimilar) plus paclitaxel compared with reference trastuzumab plus paclitaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind study
BACKGROUND: This randomised, double-blind study compared PF-05280014 (a trastuzumab biosimilar) with reference
trastuzumab (Herceptin®) sourced from the European Union (trastuzumab-EU), when each was given with paclitaxel as first-line
treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: Between 4 April 2014 and 22 January 2016, 707 participants were randomised 1:1 to receive intravenous PF-05280014
plus paclitaxel (PF-05280014 group; n = 352) or trastuzumab-EU plus paclitaxel (trastuzumab-EU group; n = 355). PF-05280014 or
trastuzumab-EU was administered weekly (first dose 4 mg/kg, subsequent doses 2 mg/kg), with the option to change to a 3-weekly
regimen (6 mg/kg) from Week 33. Treatment with PF-05280014 or trastuzumab-EU could continue until disease progression.
Paclitaxel (starting dose 80 mg/m2
) was administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of 28-day cycles for at least six cycles or until maximal
benefit of response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), evaluating responses achieved by Week 25 and
confirmed by Week 33, based on blinded central radiology review.
RESULTS: The risk ratio for ORR was 0.940 (95% CI: 0.842–1.049). The 95% CI fell within the pre-specified equivalence margin of
0.80–1.25. ORR was 62.5% (95% CI: 57.2–67.6%) in the PF-05280014 group and 66.5% (95% CI: 61.3–71.4%) in the trastuzumab-EU
group. As of data cut-off on 11 January 2017 (using data up to 378 days post-randomisation), there were no notable differences
between groups in progression-free survival (median: 12.16 months in the PF-05280014 group vs. 12.06 months in the trastuzumab-EU
group; 1-year rate: 54% vs. 51%) or overall survival (median: not reached in either group; 1-year rate: 89.31% vs. 87.36%). Safety
outcomes and immunogenicity were similar between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: When given as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, PF-05280014 plus paclitaxel
demonstrated equivalence to trastuzumab-EU plus paclitaxel in terms of ORR.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0198967
Recommended from our members
Preliminary Results of Fixed-Dose Oral Clofarabine (CLO) In Patients Who Have Failed Hypomethylating Agents for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
Abstract
Abstract 1869
Background:
Three disease-modifying drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for first-line therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). There is no accepted standard of care for patients (pts) who fail currently approved therapies, particularly the hypomethylating agents. This is the first study designed to determine the appropriate dose, and to assess the efficacy and safety of oral clofarabine (CLO) specifically in higher-risk MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) pts who failed treatment with a hypomethylating agent.
Methods:
This phase IIa, open-label, multi-center study of fixed-dose oral CLO (daily × 5 days of a 4-week cycle) enrolled adult pts with pathologically confirmed MDS or sAML (following a history of MDS) who failed up to 2 prior treatment regimens (including ≥ 1 hypomethylating agent) with failure defined as no evidence of response or being progressive under therapy (pts must have received 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents). The primary endpoints were unacceptable drug-related toxicities and overall response rate (ORR) defined as complete remission (CR) + marrow CR + partial remission (PR) + hematological improvement (HI) for MDS pts and CR + CR with incomplete peripheral blood count recovery (CRi) + PR for AML pts. Initially, pts were randomized to receive 55mg or 35mg of oral CLO daily × 5 days. Based on emerging safety data, primarily renal and infectious complications, the protocol was amended and randomization into the 55mg cohort was closed. After review of the initial data for 35mg cohort (n=8), the dose of CLO was reduced to 25mg, with the intent of improving the adverse event profile observed in these pts. Patients could receive a maximum of 8 cycles and response was assessed after cycles 2, 4, 6, and 8.
Results:
Of the 27 pts enrolled in the study from Sep 2007 - Jan 2010 (55mg [n=4], 35mg [n=8] and 25mg [n=15]) demographic and safety data are available for 22 pts (55mg [n=4], 35mg [n=8] and 25mg [n=10]). Median age was 70 years (range 41–82) with 55% male. IPSS scores at study entry were (median=2.0): 1.5–2.0 (n=16), ≥2.5 (n=6); 8 pts (36%) had intermediate, 6 pts (27%) had poor risk and 8 pts (36%) had favorable cytogenetics; and 11 pts (50%) were transfusion dependent at baseline. Previous treatment with hypomethylating agents included: decitabine (n=10 [45%], azacitidine (n=11 [50%]), or both agents (n=1 [5%]). At study entry 8 pts (36%) had relapsed disease while 13 pts (64%) were refractory and 1 pt (5%) had prior inadequate treatment. Grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events (regardless of relationship) reported in ≥10% of pts included anemia (54%), thrombocytopenia (41%), neutropenia (36%), febrile neutropenia (32%), leukopenia (32%). Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities (regardless of relationship) included pneumonia (36%), hypokalemia (27%), hypertension (23%), renal failure (18%), asthenia (14%), fatigue (14%), respiratory distress and/or failure (14%). Serious adverse events (SAE, regardless of relationship) were reported in 77% of pts. The most frequently reported SAE was febrile neutropenia (32%). The 30-day mortality was 50% in the 55 mg cohort (n=2), 13% in the 35 mg cohort (n=1) and 0% in the 25 for an overall 30-day mortality rate of 14%. Pts came off study for the following reasons: adverse event (n=8), progressive disease (n=7), other (n=5). Preliminary efficacy data are available for 16 pts, 35mg (n=6) and 25mg (n=10). Efficacy data are not available for pts enrolled in the 55mg cohort, because no pts completed the required two cycles for efficacy assessment, before the protocol was amended to allow for bone marrow evaluation at the end of cycle 1. The ORR is 31% (5/16 pts). Complete remission was achieved in 1 pt (35mg cohort) and marrow CR in 4 pts (25mg cohort). Among pts with marrow CR, 1 achieved HI-Erythroid and became transfusion independent and 1 pt had unconfirmed HI-Neutrophil. The median number of treatment cycles for the 16 patients with response assessment was 2 with a majority of responses occurring after the first cycle.
Conclusions:
These preliminary data suggest that fixed-dose oral CLO administered at 25mg daily × 5 days in pts previously treated for MDS with hypomethylating agents has an acceptable response rate and safety profile and warrants continued investigation.
Disclosures:
Sekeres: Genzyme: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Clofarabine injection (Clolar) is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of pediatric patients 1 to 21 years old with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after at least two prior regimens. This trial examines the use of oral clofarabine in patients with MDS. Roboz:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Odenike:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Agura:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Powell:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ewesuedo:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vasconcelles:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faderl:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding