Theoretical determination of lifetimes of metastable states in Sc III and Y III

Lifetimes of the first two metastable states in Sc^{2+} and Y^{2+} are determined using the relativistic coupled-cluster theory. There is a considerable interest in studying the electron correlation effects in these ions as though their electronic configurations are similar to the neutral alkali atoms, their structures are very different from the latter. We have made a comparative study of the correlation trends between the above doubly ionized systems with their corresponding neutral and singly ionized iso-electronic systems. The lifetimes of the excited states of these ions are very important in the field of astrophysics, especially for the study of post-main sequence evolution of the cool giant stars.Comment: 13 pages, 1 figure and 5 table

CRT-700.34 Short-Term Outcomes Among Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients Undergoing Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Although the use of mechanical circulatory support with Impella has been shown to improve 90-day outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk PCI (HRPCI), there is little information about the safety of this approach in pts with severe AS. We, therefore, sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of Impella-supported HRPCI among patients with varying severity of AS. Methods: We studied patients enrolled in PROTECT III—a multicenter study of patients undergoing Impella-supported HRPCI. Patients were classified according to the severity of AS: none/trivial, mild, moderate, and severe. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 90 days, defined as the composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke/ TIA, and revascularization. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital PCI-related complications, stroke/TIA, and vascular complications requiring surgery. Results: Of 596 patients with echocardiographic data, 490 had no/trivial AS, and 34, 27, and 45 had mild, moderate, or severe AS, respectively. Patients with AS were older, less likely to have diabetes, more likely to have left main disease, and had higher left ventricular ejection fractions (Table). Severely calcified lesions and the use of atherectomy were more frequent among patients with moderate or severe AS. There were no differences in rates of PCI-related complications, stroke/TIA, 30-day MACCE, or 90-day MACCE according to AS severity. Rates of transfusion were higher among patients with AS—regardless of severity. Conclusion: Among patients undergoing Impella-supported HRPCI, PCI-related complications and 90-day outcomes did not differ based on AS status or severity

CRT-700.05 Impella Utilization in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mitigates the Risks of Procedural and Clinical Adverse Events Independent of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: The Protect III Study

Background: Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of adverse events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the impact of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on the outcomes of Impella-supported high-risk PCI (HRPCI) is unknown. Methods: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, and observational PROTECT III study from March 2017 to March 2020 who underwent Impella-supported HRPCI at the operator’s discretion (non-cardiogenic shock). Patients were divided into three tertiles (T) based on baseline LVEF: T1 (the lowest), T2, and T3 (the highest). The primary outcome is the rate of 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and repeated revascularization as adjudicated by an independent CEC. Results: Of 1237 patients, 940 with available baseline LVEF were analyzed. T1 included 353 patients (mean LVEF 19.6±4.7), T2 included 274 patients (mean LVEF 32.2±3.5), and T3 included 313 patients (mean LVEF 52.6±9.2). Patients in the higher tertiles were older, more likely to be females, presented more with acute coronary syndrome, and had more frequent left main disease. Also, severely calcified lesions and atherectomy utilization were more frequent in the higher tertiles. The rates of 90-day MACCE were comparable across all tertiles. Furthermore, PCI-related complications and 1-year mortality were also comparable (Table). After multivariable adjustment, 90-day MACCE was not significantly different between the LVEF tertiles (p=0.32). Conclusion: In patients with HRPCI supported by Impella, the rates of in-hospital adverse events, PCI-related complications, 90-day MACCE, and 1-year mortality were comparable among the different LVEF tertiles

Utility of the ACC/AHA Lesion Classification to Predict Outcomes After Contemporary DES Treatment:Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis From 7 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND: Use of the modified American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) lesion classification as a prognostic tool to predict short‐ and long‐term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern drug‐eluting stent era is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient‐level data from 7 prospective, randomized trials were pooled. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing single lesion percutaneous coronary intervention with second‐generation drug‐eluting stent were analyzed according to modified ACC/AHA lesion class. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF: composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia‐driven target lesion revascularization). Clinical outcomes to 5 years were compared between patients treated for noncomplex (class A/B1) versus complex (class B2/C) lesions. Eight thousand five hundred sixteen patients (age 63.1±10.8 years, 70.5% male) were analyzed. Lesions were classified as A, B1, B2, and C in 7.9%, 28.5%, 33.7%, and 30.0% of cases, respectively. Target lesion failure was higher in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of complex versus noncomplex lesions at 30 days (2.0% versus 1.1%, P=0.004), at 1 year (4.6% versus 3.0%, P=0.0005), and at 5 years (12.4% versus 9.2%, P=0.0001). By multivariable analysis, treatment of ACC/AHA class B2/C lesions was significantly associated with higher rate of 5‐year target lesion failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17–1.64], P=0.0001) driven by significantly higher rates of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia‐driven target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled large‐scale analysis, treating complex compared with noncomplex lesions according to the modified ACC/AHA classification with second‐generation drug‐eluting stent was associated with worse 5‐year clinical outcomes. This historical classification system may be useful in the contemporary era for predicting early and late outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention

TCT-545 Angiographic Features, Lesion, and Procedural Characteristics in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Protected High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. There is a paucity of data regarding coronary lesion characteristics and procedural details of CKD patients, especially those on dialysis, undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with left ventricular support. Methods: We analyzed patients from the PROTECT III study who underwent Impella-supported HRPCI, stratified into 3 groups according to kidney function status based on history: 1) normal kidney function; 2) CKD not on dialysis; and 3) CKD on dialysis. Baseline characteristics, angiographic features, and procedural details were assessed. Results: The study population included 3,702 treated lesions in 1,223 patients with a mean age of 71 ± 11 years; 73% (893) were male, 68% (834) had normal kidney function (serum creatinine = 1 mg/dL [IQR: 0.9-1.2]), 23% (278) had CKD not on dialysis (serum creatinine = 1.6 mg/dL [IQR: 1.3-1.9]), and 9% (111) were on dialysis. Patients on dialysis were significantly younger and had more comorbidities, as well as a greater incidence of acute myocardial infarction as an indication for HRPCI compared with the other 2 groups (45.0 [dialysis] vs 30.1 [CKD not on dialysis] vs 36.0 [normal kidney function]; P = 0.03). There was no difference between groups in prevalence of 3-vessel disease (P = 0.63). Patients on dialysis had greater prevalence of severely calcified lesions and higher use of rotational and orbital atherectomy with greater number of passes (Table 1). Despite this, no significant differences were observed in post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow, incidence of no-reflow, or dissection/perforation. Conclusion: In contrast to patients with normal kidney function, patients with CKD with or without dialysis treated with Impella had more comorbidities, higher prevalence of severely calcified lesions, and greater use of atherectomy with more passes. Despite the complexity of PCI, no significant differences in complications were observed. Categories: CORONARY: Complex and Higher Risk Procedures for Indicated Patients (CHIP

TCT-99 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Protected High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) with or without left ventricular dysfunction often have high surgical risk and are declined for coronary artery bypass grafting. There is little data regarding clinical outcomes in these patients undergoing high-risk PCI (HRPCI) using Impella. Methods: We analyzed patients from the PROTECT III Study who underwent Impella-supported HRPCI and stratified them into 3 groups by kidney function status based on history: 1) normal kidney function, 2) CKD without dialysis, and 3) CKD with dialysis. We compared the composite incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate, defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and repeat revascularization at 30 and 90 days. Results: We included 1,223 patients, aged 71 ± 11 years; 73% (893) were men, 68% (834) had normal kidney function (serum creatinine [Cr] 1.1 mg/dL, IQR 0.9-1.2), 23% (278) had CKD without dialysis (Cr 1.7 mg/dL, IQR 1.3-1.9), and 9% (111) were on dialysis. Patients on dialysis were younger with more comorbidities such as diabetes, heart failure, anemia, PVD and prior stroke. HRPCI status (urgent or elective), proportion of acute MI, and mean SYNTAX scores were similar. No significant differences in MACCE were shown between groups at 30 days or 90 days (Table). Patients with normal kidney function had comparable risks of 30-day and 90-day MACCE compared with CKD patients without dialysis with Cox proportional hazards analysis, and lower risk of 90-day MACCE compared to CKD patients with dialysis. Notably, CKD patients with or without dialysis also had similar 90-day MACCE risk (Table). Conclusion: Patients with CKD and dialysis undergoing HRPCI exhibit higher risk for 90-day MACCE compared to patients with normal kidney function. CKD patients without dialysis also had higher risk of MI at 90 days. Further research is needed. Categories: CORONARY: Complex and Higher Risk Procedures for Indicated Patients (CHIP

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial

Background: There is limited information on the incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). Objectives: This study sought to determine the incidence of NOAF following PCI and CABG for LMCAD and its effect on 3-year cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: In the EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial, 1,905 patients with LMCAD and low or intermediate SYNTAX scores were randomized to PCI with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG. Outcomes were analyzed according to the development of NOAF during the initial hospitalization following revascularization. Results: Among 1,812 patients without atrial fibrillation on presentation, NOAF developed at a mean of 2.7 ± 2.5 days after revascularization in 162 patients (8.9%), including 161 of 893 (18.0%) CABG-treated patients and 1 of 919 (0.1%) PCI-treated patients (p < 0.0001). Older age, greater body mass index, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were independent predictors of NOAF in patients undergoing CABG. Patients with versus without NOAF had a significantly longer duration of hospitalization, were more likely to be discharged on anticoagulant therapy, and had an increased 30-day rate of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major or minor bleeding (14.2% vs. 5.5%; p < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, NOAF after CABG was an independent predictor of 3-year stroke (6.6% vs. 2.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74 to 10.11; p = 0.001), death (11.4% vs. 4.3%; adjusted HR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.60 to 5.70; p = 0.0006), and the primary composite endpoint of death, MI, or stroke (22.6% vs. 12.8%; adjusted HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.39 to 3.25; p = 0.0004). Conclusions: In patients with LMCAD undergoing revascularization in the EXCEL trial, NOAF was common after CABG but extremely rare after PCI. The development of NOAF was strongly associated with subsequent death and stroke in CABG-treated patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether prophylactic strategies to prevent or treat atrial fibrillation may improve prognosis in patients with LMCAD who are undergoing CABG. (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularizatio

Self-perceived psychological stress and ischemic stroke: a case-control study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A growing body of evidence suggests that psychological stress contributes to coronary artery disease. However, associations between stress and stroke are less clear. In this study, we investigated the possible association between ischemic stroke and self-perceived psychological stress, as measured by a single-item questionnaire, previously reported to be associated with myocardial infarction.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In the Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke (SAHLSIS), 600 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (aged 18 to 69 years) and 600 age-matched and sex-matched population controls were recruited. Ischemic stroke subtype was determined according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. Self-perceived psychological stress preceding stroke was assessed retrospectively using a single-item questionnaire.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Permanent self-perceived psychological stress during the last year or longer was independently associated with overall ischemic stroke (multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06 to 5.93). Analyses by stroke subtype showed that this association was present for large vessel disease (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.58 to 9.67), small vessel disease (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.64 to 6.24), and cryptogenic stroke (OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.34 to 6.95), but not for cardioembolic stroke (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.39).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this case-control study, we found an independent association between self-perceived psychological stress and ischemic stroke. A novel finding was that this association differed by ischemic stroke subtype. Our results emphasize the need for further prospective studies addressing the potential role for psychological stress as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. In such studies ischemic stroke subtypes should be taken into consideration.</p

Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium Definitions for Tricuspid Regurgitation and Trial Endpoints.

Interest in the pathophysiology, etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has grown in the wake of multiple natural history studies showing progressively worse outcomes associated with increasing TR severity, even after adjusting for multiple comorbidities. Historically, isolated tricuspid valve surgery has been associated with high in-hospital mortality rates, leading to the development of transcatheter treatment options. The aim of this first Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document is to standardize definitions of disease etiology and severity, as well as endpoints for trials that aim to address the gaps in our knowledge related to identification and management of patients with TR. Standardizing endpoints for trials should provide consistency and enable meaningful comparisons between clinical trials. A second Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document will focus on further defining trial endpoints and will discuss trial design options