35 research outputs found

    Tuberculosis recurrence after completion treatment in a European city: reinfection or relapse?

    Get PDF
    Background Tuberculosis (TB) recurrence can be due to reinfection or relapse. The contribution of each to TB incidence and the factors associated with recurrence are not well known. Effectiveness of TB control programs is assessed in part by recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to establish the recurrence rate of TB in Barcelona, the associated risk factors and the role of reinfection. Methods A population-based retrospective longitudinal study was performed in Barcelona, Spain. TB patients with positive culture results who completed treatment between Jan 1st, 2003 and Dec 31st, 2006 were followed-up until December 31st, 2009 by the TB Control Program. The incidence rate of recurrence was calculated per person-year of follow-up (py). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for the survival analysis by calculating the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of the 1,823 TB cases identified, 971 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 13 (1.3%) had recurrent TB. The recurrence rate was 341 cases per 100,000 py, 13 times higher than the TB incidence of the general population. Likelihood of TB recurrence at the 1st, 3rd and 5th year of follow-up was 0.1%, 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively. Factors associated with recurrence were HIV infection (HR: 4.7, CI: 1.4-15.7), living in the inner city district (HR: 3.9, CI: 1.3-11.8) and history of TB treatment (HR: 5.2, CI: 1.7-16.2). Genotyping results of recurrent cases were available for 6 patients (3 reinfections and 3 relapses). Conclusion The rate of TB recurrence in Barcelona is low and most episodes occur within the first three years. Patients at higher risk of recurrence are co-infected with HIV, living in neighborhoods with high TB incidence or with a history of TB treatment. When available, genotyping results help determine whether the recurrence is due to reinfection or relapse

    Computer Generation of Optimized Subroutines

    No full text

    How accurate are published recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery? A meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The literature shows wide variations of recurrence rates (RRs) after abdominal surgery for rectal prolapse. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of published RRs. METHODS: An electronic search was performed with no restrictions. Inclusion criterion was abdominal surgery in at least 10 adults with follow-up evaluation of any length of time. Two reviewers screened 1669 references. A total of 190 investigators were asked to provide individual patient data that should be the same used at the time their reports were written. The RR was estimated by actuarial analysis. Investigators were asked for comments on results. RESULTS: Individual patient data from 6 reports published with 273 patients (186 women, 87 men) with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-88 y) were available. Abdominal surgery included mobilization with pexy (88%), with additional resection (7%), or mobilization only (5%). There were 16 recurrences at a median follow-up period of 3.94 years (range, .05-15.11 y). The effect of age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.010; P = .3443), sex (HR, 2.070; P = .4260), surgical technique (HR, .743; P = .7669), and publication (HR, 1.014; P = .8747) on RR was not significant. Two publications reported a RR of 0. In another report, the published and estimated RRs of 15% did not differ. Published RRs differed from estimated RRs in 3 reports (2.5% vs 4%; 7% vs 54%; and 9.6% vs 36%). The pooled odds ratios of 6 reports revealed a borderline significant difference between the published and estimated RRs (P = .066). CONCLUSIONS: Published RRs differed by as much as 47% from the RRs estimated by actuarial analysis depending on event definition and how the data were censored
    corecore