26 research outputs found

    Mean relative growth rate of tillers (cm/cm/day) (±1 S.E.) across the duration of the experiment, as measured at each of nine measurement intervals (measurements for all treatments were made within a two-day window for each interval).

    No full text
    <p>Asterisks indicate dates for which there was a significant difference between treatment means. Flame symbols indicate when the two prescribed burn treatments were applied to either both the 1x and 2x treatments for the first burn (25 March), or the 2x treatment only for the second burn (12 May).</p

    Average total pot tiller length (±1 S.E.) across the duration of the experiment, as measured at each of nine measurement intervals (measurements for all treatments were made within a two-day window for each interval).

    No full text
    <p>Asterisks indicate dates for which there was a significant difference between treatment means. Flame symbols indicate when the two prescribed burn treatments were applied to either both the 1x and 2x treatments for the first burn (25 March), or the 2x treatment only for the second burn (12 May).</p

    Mean measured growth response variables (±1 S.E.) at the final harvest for tall fescue plants exposed to Wet and Dry water regimes and averaged across burn treatments and endophyte status.

    No full text
    <p>Parameters shown are those for which watering regime had a significant main effect (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0086904#pone-0086904-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> above). Letters represent LS Means differences (α = 0.05) for the main water regime effect.</p

    Growth and reproduction of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue from different origins.

    No full text
    <p>Biomass (x±S.E.) and number of flowerheads (x±S.E.) of endophyte free (E-), endophyte infected (E+) and manipulatively endophyte free (ME-) tall fescue plants in Finland and Kentucky field experiments in years 2005 and 2006. Plants were collected from wild populations in Europe (A = island of Åland, G = Island of Gotland, S = coastal Sweden) or were cultivars from Europe (Retu) or USA (KY-31).</p

    Mortality of tall fescue plants in Finland in the end of the experiment.

    No full text
    <p>Plant origins: K = ‘Kentucky 31’ cultivar, R = ‘Retu’ cultivar, A = wild type from Åland, G = wild type from Gotland, S = wild type from costal Sweden. Treatments: C = control, W = water application, N = nutrient application, WN = water and nutrient application. The origin-treatment interaction is indicated by * (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157382#pone.0157382.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>).</p

    Effects of nutrient and water treatments, and plant origin on tall fescue growth.

    No full text
    <p>Model-based estimates for biomass (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157382#pone.0157382.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> for model) on treatments (C = control, W = water treatment, N = nutrient treatment, WN = water and nutrient treatment) and three wild populations and two cultivars (A = Åland island, G = Gotland island, S = coastal Sweden, KY-31 = cultivar ‘Kentucky 31’, Retu = cultivar ‘Retu’) for tall fescue biomass in Finland and Kentucky experiments in the two study years, 2005 and 2006.</p

    Effects of nutrient and water treatments, and plant origin on tall fescue reproduction.

    No full text
    <p>Model-based estimated means of treatments (C = control, W = water treatment, N = nutrient treatment, WN = water and nutrient treatment) and three wild populations and two cultivars (A = Åland island, G = Gotland island, S = coastal Sweden, KY-31 = cultivar ‘Kentucky-31’, Retu = cultivar ‘Retu’) for number of tall fescue flowerheads in Finland and Kentucky experiments in the two study years, 2005 and 2006.</p

    Growth and reproduction of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue in different environmental conditions.

    No full text
    <p>Biomass (x±S.E.) and number of flowerheads (x±S.E.) of endophyte free (E-), endophyte infected (E+) and manipulatively endophyte free (ME-) tall fescue plants in Finland and Kentucky field experiments in years 2005 and 2006. The plants received either only ambient rain (C) or water (W), nutrient (N) and combined water and nutrient (WN) treatments.</p
    corecore