Impact of liberal preoperative clear fluid fasting regimens on the risk of pulmonary aspiration in children (EUROFAST) : an international prospective cohort study

Background Preoperative fasting regimens designed to minimise the risk of pulmonary aspiration have undergone significant changes, but unequivocal evidence of the safety of reducing clear fluid fasting has been lacking. We compared the risk of pulmonary aspiration in children using three different recommendations for clear fluid fasting. Methods In this prospective multicentre cohort study, centres with >1000 paediatric anaesthesia cases per year were eligible. Regurgitation events, whether they were transient or led to consequences affecting postoperative care, were reported in detail. All centres also reported the number of anaesthetised children per year and which preoperative fasting regimen they used. Results The 31 participating centres contributed a total of 306 900 anaesthetic procedures. The incidence of confirmed pulmonary aspiration was 1.18:10 000 in the sip-til-send group, 0.96:10 000 in the >= 1 h group, and 1.83:10 000 in the control group. There was no mortality as a result of aspiration. The 95% confidence intervals of the differences in confirmed pulmonary aspiration between the control group and the >= 1 h clear fluid fasting and the sip-til-send group were -0.344 to 3.76 and -1.48 to 3.63, respectively. Both sip-til-send and >= 1 h clear fluid fasting were statistically noninferior to >= 2 h clear fluid fasting regarding the incidence of confirmed aspiration, transient regurgitation, and regurgitation leading to escalation of care or intensive care. Conclusions The study provides evidence for the safety of reducing preoperative fasting time for clear fluids in children aged <16 yr from 2 h to <= 1 h. <ol> </ol&gt

Increasing Cefazolin Use for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin-Allergic Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the most commonly recommended antibiotic for perioperative prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections. Children with a reported penicillin allergy often receive an alternative antibiotic because of a common misunderstanding of the cross-reactivity between these antibiotics. This use of alternative antibiotics in surgical populations have been associated with increased infections, antibiotic resistance, and health care costs. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who receive cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS A multidisciplinary team conducted this quality improvement initiative, with a series of 3 plan-do-study-act cycles aimed at children with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies undergoing surgical procedures that require antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of surgical encounters among patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who received cefazolin as antibiotic prophylaxis. Statistical process control charts were used to measure improvement over time. RESULTS Approximately 400 children were involved in this project. There was special cause variation and a shift in the center line from 60% to 80% of eligible patients receiving cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis, which was sustained for the duration of the project. In the last month, 90% of eligible patient received cefazolin, surpassing our goal of 85%. This improvement has been sustained in the 5 months after project completion. We had no cases of severe allergic reactions in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS Our multidisciplinary education-focused interventions were associated with a significant increase in the use of cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patient with penicillin allergies. </jats:sec