Classification of substandard factors in perinatal care:development and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement of the Groningen-system

Background: Perinatal audit is an established method for improving the quality of perinatal care. In audit meetings substandard factors (SSF) are identified in cases of perinatal mortality and morbidity. To our knowledge there is no classification system specifically designed for the classification of substandard factors. Such a classification may help to standardise allocation of substandard factors to categories. This will help to prioritise, guide and implement actions in quality improvement programs. Methods: A classification system of 284 substandard factors (SSF) identified in perinatal audit meetings between 2007 and 2011 was drawn up using the WHO Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety as a starting point. Discussions were held on inter-rater disagreements, inclusion of items, format and organisation and definitions of the main-and subcategories. A guideline was developed. An independent multidisciplinary group tested the classification. Independent of inter-rater agreement the allocations to categories were counted. For the counts in the subcategories one and two, we used the allocations in the main category as reference. The chance corrected agreement between classifiers was tested with Cohen's kappa statistic. Results: The classification consists of 9 main categories with one or two subcategories. The main categories are (1) Equipment and Materials, (2) Medication, (3) Additional tests/investigations, (4) Transportation, (5) Documentation, (6) Communication, (7) Medical practice, (8) Other and (9) non classifiable. Of 3663 allocations by 13 classifiers 1452 SSF's were allocated (40 %) to 'medical practice' and 1247 (34 %) to 'documentation'. 118 (3 %) times SSF's were not classifiable, mainly due to unclear phrasing of the SSF. The chance corrected agreement of 284 substandard factors in the main category was 0.68 (95 % CI 0.66-0.70) and 0.57 (95 % CI 0.54-0.59) for the CDG and the IGD respectively. Conclusions: Classifying substandard factors has given insight into problem area's in perinatal care and can give direction to medical, political and financial quality improvement measures. The Groningen-system has well defined categories and subcategories and the guidelines and examples are clear. The multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement is moderate to good. Improvement of the phrasing of the substandard factors is expected to improve inter-rater agreement

Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the contribution of different diagnostic tests for determining cause of fetal death. Our goal was to propose a workup guideline. STUDY DESIGN: In a multicenter prospective cohort study from 2002 through 2008, for 1025 couples with fetal death >= 20 weeks' gestation, an extensive nonselective diagnostic workup was performed. A panel classified cause and determined contribution of diagnostics for allocating cause. RESULTS: A Kleihauer-Betke, autopsy, placental examination, and cytogenetic analysis were abnormal in 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-14.2), 51.5% (95% CI, 47.4-55.2), 89.2% (95% CI, 87.2-91.1), and 11.9% (95% CI, 8.7-15.7), respectively. The most valuable tests for determination of cause were placental examination (95.7%; 95% CI, 94.2-96.8), autopsy (72.6%; 95% CI, 69.2-75.9), and cytogenetic analysis (29.0%; 95% CI, 24.4-34.0). CONCLUSION: Autopsy, placental examination, cytogenetic analysis, and testing for fetal maternal hemorrhage are basic tests for workup after fetal death. Based on the results of these tests or on specific clinical characteristics, further sequential testing is indicated

Cytogenetic analysis after evaluation of 750 fetal deaths: proposal for diagnostic workup

OBJECTIVE: To estimate success rates for cytogenetic analysis in different tissues after intrauterine fetal death, and study selection criteria and value of cytogenetic testing in determining cause of death. METHODS: Cytogenetic analyses and the value of this test in determining cause by a multidisciplinary panel were studied in 750 fetal deaths. Morphologic abnormalities, small for gestational age (SGA), advanced maternal age (older than 35 years) and maceration were studied as selection criteria. RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 13% of fetal deaths. Cytogenetic success rates were significantly higher for invasive testing (85%) than for postpartum tissue analysis (28%, P CONCLUSION: Parents should be counseled on aspects of cytogenetic analysis after fetal death. We advise performing nonselective invasive testing after fetal death and before labor for all fetal deaths

Additional file 1: of Classification of substandard factors in perinatal care: development and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement of the Groningen-system

Examples of the classification of substandard factors. (PDF 37 kb

Diverse Placental Pathologies as the Main Causes of Fetal Death

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the occurrence of placental causes of fetal death in relation to different gestational ages and their clinical manifestations during pregnancy.METHODS: In a prospective cohort study conducted from 2002 to 2006, we studied 750 couples with singleton intrauterine fetal death after 20 weeks of gestation. Cause of death was classified according to the Dutch Tulip cause of death classification for perinatal mortality. Differences between groups for categorical data were evaluated by the Fisher exact test or chi(2) test.RESULTS: The main causes were placental pathology (64.9%), congenital anomaly (5.3%), infection (1.9%), other (4.8%), and unknown (23.1%). The contribution of causes differed over gestational age periods. At lower gestational age, placental and unknown were the most dominant causes of death (34.8% and 41.7%, respectively); at higher gestational age, the relative importance of an unknown cause decreased and a placental cause increased (16.5% and 77.6%) (PCONCLUSION: Most fetal deaths were caused by a variety of placental pathologies. These were related to gestational age, and their clinical manifestations varied during pregnancy. (Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:809-17)</p

Diverse Placental Pathologies as the Main Causes of Fetal Death

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the occurrence of placental causes of fetal death in relation to different gestational ages and their clinical manifestations during pregnancy. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study conducted from 2002 to 2006, we studied 750 couples with singleton intrauterine fetal death after 20 weeks of gestation. Cause of death was classified according to the Dutch Tulip cause of death classification for perinatal mortality. Differences between groups for categorical data were evaluated by the Fisher exact test or chi(2) test. RESULTS: The main causes were placental pathology (64.9%), congenital anomaly (5.3%), infection (1.9%), other (4.8%), and unknown (23.1%). The contribution of causes differed over gestational age periods. At lower gestational age, placental and unknown were the most dominant causes of death (34.8% and 41.7%, respectively); at higher gestational age, the relative importance of an unknown cause decreased and a placental cause increased (16.5% and 77.6%) (P CONCLUSION: Most fetal deaths were caused by a variety of placental pathologies. These were related to gestational age, and their clinical manifestations varied during pregnancy. (Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:809-17