The impact of mode of delivery on the outcome in very preterm twins

Objective: Studies on the optimal mode of delivery in women with a twin pregnancy <32 weeks are scarce. We studied the effects of the mode of delivery on perinatal and maternal outcomes in very preterm twin pregnancy.Study Design: Population-based cohort study including all women with twin pregnancy who delivered very preterm (26-32 weeks of gestation) in the Netherlands between January 2000 and December 2010. We compared perinatal mortality and neonatal and maternal morbidity according to the intended mode of delivery as well as to the actual mode of delivery. Perinatal outcomes were paired taking into account the dependency between the children of the same twin pregnancy and were also analysed for each child separately. We used logistic regression to correct for possible confounding factors.Results: We studied 1,655 women with a very preterm delivery of a twin pregnancy. A planned caesarean section (n = 212) was associated with a significantly higher perinatal mortality compared to a planned vaginal delivery (n = 1.443) (10% compared to 6.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.2). The same applied for perinatal morbidity (66% compared to 63%; adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0), maternal morbidity (17% compared to 4.9%; adjusted OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.6-6.3) and for perinatal mortality for the second twin (7.1% compared to 3.5% adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-5.2).Conclusion: In very preterm delivery of twins a vaginal delivery is the preferred mode of delivery.Ben W. Mol, Lester Bergenhenegouwen, Sabine Ensing, Anita C. Ravelli and Marjolein Ko

Increasing maternal age at first pregnancy planning: Health outcomes and associated costs

Objectives: To describe the consequences in terms of health outcomes, care and associated healthcare costs for three hypothetical cohorts of women planning their first pregnancy at a fixed, different age. Design: Decision model based on data from perinatal registries and the literature. Setting: The Netherlands. Population: 3 hypothetical cohorts of 100 000 women aged 23, 29 and 36 years, planning a first pregnancy. Main outcome measures: Live birth, pregnancy complications for mother and child and associated healthcare costs. Results: For the three cohorts of 23-, 29- and 36-yearold women, 1.6%, 4.6% and 14% of women would not succeed in an ongoing pregnancy (spontaneous or after assisted reproductive technolo

Provinciale verschillen in perinatale sterfte en reistijd tot ziekenhuis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in perinatal mortality between Dutch provinces and to determine the significance of risk factors including travel time from home to the hospital during labour. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHOD: The study was based on 1,242,725 singleton births in 2000-2006 as recorded in the Netherlands Perinatal Registry. The influence of province on perinatal mortality was estimated, with logistic regression analysis adjusting for risk factors (age, parity, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) and care factors such as start of antenatal care and travel time. RESULTS: The perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands was 9.9 per 1000 births. The provinces with the highest mortality rates were Friesland (11.3 per thousand), Groningen (11.1 per thousand), Zeeland (10.6 per thousand) and Flevoland (10.4 per thousand). Noord-Brabant (9.2 per thousand) and Limburg (9.2 per thousand) had the lowest mortality rates. These differences were significant higher for Friesland (odds ratio: 1.16; 95%-CI: 1.05-1.28) and Groningen (odds ratio: 1.13; 95%-CI: 1.02-1.26). Starting late with perinatal care, at 18 weeks of gestation or later was an important risk factor (adjusted odds ratio 1.8; 95%-CI: 1.7-1.8). Low socio-economic status could partly be associated with the higher mortality risk in Groningen. Longer travel time (>/= 20 minutes) was an independent risk factor associated with perinatal mortality. On average 19% of the women travelled >/= 20 minutes to the hospital. In the provinces Groningen, Friesland, Flevoland and Zeeland these percentages ranged between 32 and 36%. The adjusted odds ratio of travel time was 1.7 (95%-CI 1.6-1.7). CONCLUSION: The perinatal mortality differs per province. This can be explained by longer travel time to the hospital during labour. Late start of perinatal care and low socio-economic status also affect the mortality rate. These risk factors need to be taken into account during registration, investigation, audit and obstetric policy

Recurrence rate and outcome of postterm pregnancy, a national cohort study

Contains fulltext : 153825.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVE: To assess the recurrence rate of postterm delivery (gestational age at or beyond 42+0 weeks or 294 days) and to describe maternal and perinatal outcomes after previous postterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: From the longitudinal linked Netherlands Perinatal Registry database, we selected all singleton primiparous women who delivered between 37+0 and 42+6 weeks with a subsequent singleton pregnancy from 1999 to 2007. We excluded congenital abnormalities. We compared the recurrence rate of postterm delivery and risk of antenatal fetal death in women with and without a postterm delivery in their first pregnancy. We compared perinatal outcome (composite of perinatal mortality, Apgar score 1000ml and blood transfusions) between women with a recurrent and a de novo postterm second pregnancy. RESULTS: Our study population consisted of 233,327 women of whom 17,874 (7.7%) delivered postterm in the first pregnancy. In the second pregnancy, 2678 (15%) women had a recurrent postterm delivery compared to 8698 (4%) women with a de novo postterm delivery (odds ratio (OR) 4.2 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-4.4). Subgroup analysis in recurrent and de novo postterm delivery showed no differences in composite perinatal and composite maternal outcome (OR 1.0; CI 0.7-1.5, p=0.90 and OR 1.1, CI 0.9-1.4, p=0.16), adjusted for fetal position and mode of delivery). CONCLUSIONS: Women with a postterm delivery in the first pregnancy have a higher risk of recurrent postterm delivery. Our data suggest that there is no difference in the composite adverse perinatal outcome between recurrent and de novo postterm delivery

Neonatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the neonatal morbidity in late preterm infants born from mothers with a hypertensive disorder. STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the national Perinatal Registry in The Netherlands on women who delivered between 34(+0) and 36(+6) weeks with gestational hypertension (n = 4316), preeclampsia (n = 1864), and normotensive controls (n = 20,749). RESULTS: Children from mothers with preeclampsia had an increased risk for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit compared with children from normotensive mothers (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-2.2). A cesarean delivery and decreasing gestational age were independent risk factors for neonatal respiratory morbidity. Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia reduced the risk of respiratory distress syndrome compared with the control group (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.0 and OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96, respectively). CONCLUSION: Neonatal morbidity in the late preterm period is considerable. Hypertensive disorders appear to protect for neonatal respiratory morbidity, but higher rates of cesarean section diminish this protective effect.

[Decrease in foetal and neonatal mortality in the Netherlands; comparison with other Euro-Peristat countries in 2004, 2010 and 2015]

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: To compare changes in foetal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in the Netherlands in 2015, relative to 2004 and 2010, with changes in other European countries and regions. DESIGN: Descriptive population-wide study. METHOD: Data from 32 European countries and regions within the Euro-Peristat registration area were analysed. These countries and regions were grouped into: the Netherlands, Scandinavia, Western Europe and Eastern Europe. International differences in registration and policies were taken into account by using rates from 28 weeks gestation for foetal mortality and for 24 weeks gestation and beyond for neonatal mortality. Ranking was based on individual countries and regions. RESULTS: Foetal mortality decreased by 24% in the Netherlands, from 2.9 per 1,000 births in 2010 to 2.2 per 1,000 births in 2015; neonatal mortality decreased by 9%, from 2.2 to 2.0 per 1,000 live births. Perinatal mortality (the sum of foetal mortality and neonatal mortality) decreased by 18% from 5.1 to 4.2 per 1,000 births. The Netherlands moved from the 18th place in the European ranking in 2004 to the 10th place in 2015. CONCLUSION: Foetal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in the Netherlands decreased in 2015 when compared with 2004 and 2010. The country's position in the European ranking also improved. Explanations for this decrease are related to changes in the areas of organisation of care, population and risk factors. When mortality rates in other European countries and regions - particularly Scandinavia - are considered there is room for further improvement

Decrease in foetal and neonatal mortality in the Netherlands; comparison with other Euro-Peristat countries in 2004, 2010 and 2015

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in foetal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in the Netherlands in 2015, relative to 2004 and 2010, with changes in other European countries and regions. DESIGN: Descriptive population-wide study. METHOD: Data from 32 European countries and regions within the Euro-Peristat registration area were analysed. These countries and regions were grouped into: the Netherlands, Scandinavia, Western Europe and Eastern Europe. International differences in registration and policies were taken into account by using rates from 28 weeks gestation for foetal mortality and for 24 weeks gestation and beyond for neonatal mortality. Ranking was based on individual countries and regions. RESULTS: Foetal mortality decreased by 24% in the Netherlands, from 2.9 per 1,000 births in 2010 to 2.2 per 1,000 births in 2015; neonatal mortality decreased by 9%, from 2.2 to 2.0 per 1,000 live births. Perinatal mortality (the sum of foetal mortality and neonatal mortality) decreased by 18% from 5.1 to 4.2 per 1,000 births. The Netherlands moved from the 18th place in the European ranking in 2004 to the 10th place in 2015. CONCLUSION: Foetal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in the Netherlands decreased in 2015 when compared with 2004 and 2010. The country's position in the European ranking also improved. Explanations for this decrease are related to changes in the areas of organisation of care, population and risk factors. When mortality rates in other European countries and regions - particularly Scandinavia - are considered there is room for further improvement