4 research outputs found

    The effect of autistic traits on disembedding and mental rotation in neurotypical women and men.

    Get PDF
    Recent data has revealed dissociations between social and non-social skills in both autistic and neurotypical populations. In the present study, we investigated whether specific visuospatial abilities, such as figure disembedding and mental rotation, are differently related to social and non-social autistic traits, in neurotypical women and men. University students (N = 426) completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), figure disembedding and mental rotation of two-dimensional figures tasks. AQ social skills (AQ-social) and attention-to-details (AQ-attention) subscales were used as measures of social and non-social autistic traits, respectively. Mental rotation was affected by a significant interaction between sex, social and non-social traits. When non-social traits were above the mean (+ 1 SD), no sex differences in mental rotation were found. Instead, below this value, sex differences depended on the social traits, with men on average outperforming women at middle-to-high social traits, and with a comparable performance, and with women on average outperforming men, at lower social traits. A small positive correlation between figure disembedding and social traits was observed in the overall sample. These results are interpreted in terms of the hyper-systemizing theory of autism and contribute to the evidence of individual differences in the cognitive style of autistic people and neurotypical people with autistic traits

    Egocentric metric representations in peripersonal space: A bridge between motor resources and spatial memory

    No full text
    Research on visuo-spatial memory has shown that egocentric (subject-to-object) and allocentric (object-to-object) reference frames are connected to categorical (nonmetric) and coordinate (metric) spatial relations, and that motor resources are recruited especially when processing spatial information in peripersonal (within arm reaching) than extrapersonal (outside arm reaching) spaces. In order to perform our daily-life activities, these spatial components cooperate along a continuum from recognitionrelated (e.g., recognizing stimuli) to action-related (reaching stimuli) purposes. Therefore, it is possible that some types of spatial representations rely more on action/motor processes than others. Here we explored the role of motor resources on the combinations of these visuo-spatial memory components. A motor interference paradigm was adopted in which participants had their arms bent behind their back or free during a spatial memory task. This task consisted in memorizing triads of objects and then verbally judging what was the object: 1) closest to/farthest from you (egocentric coordinate); 2) on your right/left (egocentric categorical); 3) closest to/farthest from an object (allocentric coordinate); 4) on the right/left of an object (allocentric categorical). The triads appeared in participants’ peripersonal (Experiment 1) or extrapersonal (Experiment 2) spaces. The results of Experiment 1 showed that motor interference selectively damaged egocentric coordinate judgments but not the other spatial combinations. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the interference effect disappeared when the objects were in the extrapersonal space. A third follow-up study using a within-subject design confirmed the overall pattern of results. Our findings provide evidence that motor resources play an important role in the combination of coordinate spatial relations and egocentric representations in peripersonal space
    corecore