Characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients without traditional risk factors:an RE-LY AF registry analysis

Aims: Data on patient characteristics, prevalence, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients without traditional risk factors, often labelled 'lone AF', are sparse. Methods and results: The RE-LY AF registry included 15 400 individuals who presented to emergency departments with AF in 47 countries. This analysis focused on patients without traditional risk factors, including age >= 60years, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, congenital heart disease, pulmonary disease, valve heart disease, hyperthyroidism, and prior cardiac surgery. Patients without traditional risk factors were compared with age- and region-matched controls with traditional risk factors (1:3 fashion). In 796 (5%) patients, no traditional risk factors were present. However, 98% (779/796) had less-established or borderline risk factors, including borderline hypertension (130-140/80-90mmHg; 47%), chronic kidney disease (eGFR30; 19%), diabetes (5%), excessive alcohol intake (>14 units/week; 4%), and smoking (25%). Compared with patients with traditional risk factors (n=2388), patients without traditional risk factors were more often men (74% vs. 59%, P Conclusion: Almost all patients without traditionally defined AF risk factors have less-established or borderline risk factors. These patients have a favourable 1-year prognosis, but risk of AF-related re-hospitalization remains high. Greater emphasis should be placed on recognition and management of less-established or borderline risk factors

The Changing Landscape for Stroke\ua0Prevention in AF: Findings From the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase 2

Background GLORIA-AF (Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is a prospective, global registry program describing antithrombotic treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke. Phase 2 began when dabigatran, the first non\u2013vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), became available. Objectives This study sought to describe phase 2 baseline data and compare these with the pre-NOAC era collected during phase 1. Methods During phase 2, 15,641 consenting patients were enrolled (November 2011 to December 2014); 15,092 were eligible. This pre-specified cross-sectional analysis describes eligible patients\u2019 baseline characteristics. Atrial fibrillation disease characteristics, medical outcomes, and concomitant diseases and medications were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of the total patients, 45.5% were female; median age was 71 (interquartile range: 64, 78) years. Patients were from Europe (47.1%), North America (22.5%), Asia (20.3%), Latin America (6.0%), and the Middle East/Africa (4.0%). Most had high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age  6575 years, Diabetes mellitus, previous Stroke, Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category] score  652; 86.1%); 13.9% had moderate risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 1). Overall, 79.9% received oral anticoagulants, of whom 47.6% received NOAC and 32.3% vitamin K antagonists (VKA); 12.1% received antiplatelet agents; 7.8% received no antithrombotic treatment. For comparison, the proportion of phase 1 patients (of N = 1,063 all eligible) prescribed VKA was 32.8%, acetylsalicylic acid 41.7%, and no therapy 20.2%. In Europe in phase 2, treatment with NOAC was more common than VKA (52.3% and 37.8%, respectively); 6.0% of patients received antiplatelet treatment; and 3.8% received no antithrombotic treatment. In North America, 52.1%, 26.2%, and 14.0% of patients received NOAC, VKA, and antiplatelet drugs, respectively; 7.5% received no antithrombotic treatment. NOAC use was less common in Asia (27.7%), where 27.5% of patients received VKA, 25.0% antiplatelet drugs, and 19.8% no antithrombotic treatment. Conclusions The baseline data from GLORIA-AF phase 2 demonstrate that in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients, NOAC have been highly adopted into practice, becoming more frequently prescribed than VKA in Europe and North America. Worldwide, however, a large proportion of patients remain undertreated, particularly in Asia and North America. (Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [GLORIA-AF]; NCT01468701

Persistent atrial fibrillation: current approach and controversies

Purpose of review: To address the changing definition of atrial fibrillation as it reflects the major paradigm shift in the comprehension of mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation and the possible treatment options targeting persistent atrial fibrillation. Recent findings: Persistent atrial fibrillation exists in a spectrum that is linked to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The mechanism underlying persistent atrial fibrillation has evolved significantly but requires further understanding in order to improve its management. The role of external factors, such as blood pressure, on the development of persistent atrial fibrillation and its underlying substrate require further exploration. Catheter ablation has evolved significantly but controversy remains regarding the optimal approach for persistent atrial fibrillation. Summary: The definition of atrial fibrillation has evolved significantly as a result of knowledge gathered from therapy with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Further trials are required to investigate the causes, mechanisms and optimal therapies for persistent atrial fibrillation

Systematic review of treatment gaps in oral anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation

Aims: Guidelines endorse long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and additional stroke risk factors. However, diverse estimates of guideline based OAC treatment are reported. The objective was to provide insight into the variability seen in estimates of OAC treatment uptake and treatment gaps in clinical practice. Methods and results: A systematic review was conducted following Cochrane methodology, using comprehensive search terms for AF and anticoagulation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (January 2006–2016) were searched, and prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting OAC use included. Study data and patient characteristics were extracted, OAC rates pooled by study factors, and meta-regression analysis conducted to identify factors associated with OAC uptake.Of 8861 records screened, 155 eligible datasets from 147 studies were identified [median (25th, 75th percentiles) 2259 (595, 10,240) patients, mean age 73.8 ± 7.1 years]. The majority of studies included AF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc >1 [median proportion (25th, 75th percentile) 0.92 (0.83, 1.00)]. OAC use varied across studies [median proportion (25th, 75th percentile) 51.2% (36.7%, 64.7%)] with high heterogeneity (I2 = 100.0%). In the meta-regression analysis [coefficient, p], prospective study design (0.093, p = 0.008), general practitioner treating physician (0.105, p = 0.001) and data collection after 2013 (0.072, p = 0.070) were associated with higher OAC use. Consecutive enrollment (−0.075, p = 0.008) and Asian region (−0.181, p < 0.001) were associated with lower OAC use. Conclusion: Study factors, geographical and treatment settings are associated with estimates of OAC use and are important considerations for researchers and policy makers to appropriately interpret reported anticoagulation treatment rates. Consideration of these factors may help to more effectively measure interventions, and design studies to improve anticoagulation uptake

Initial Human Feasibility of Infusion Needle Catheter Ablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Cardiolog