38 research outputs found
Agricultural and empowerment pathways from land ownership to women's nutrition in India.
Land size is an important equity concern for the design of 'nutrition-sensitive' agricultural interventions. We unpack some of the pathways between land and nutrition using a cross-sectional baseline survey data set of 4,480 women from 148 clusters from the 'Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition' trial in Keonjhar district in Odisha, India. Variables used are household ln-land size owned (exposure) and maternal dietary diversity score out of 10 food groups and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2 ) (outcomes); and mediators investigated are production diversity score, value of agricultural production, and indicators for women's empowerment (decision-making in agriculture, group participation, work-free time and land ownership). We assessed mediation using a non-parametric potential outcomes framework method. Land size positively affects maternal dietary diversity scores [β 0.047; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.011, 0.082)] but not BMI. Production diversity, but not value of production, accounts for 17.6% of total effect mediated. We observe suppression of the effect of land size on BMI, with no evidence of a direct effect for either of the agricultural mediators but indirect effects of β -0.031 [95% CI (-0.048, -0.017)] through production diversity and β -0.047 [95% CI (-0.075, -0.021)] through value of production. An increase in land size positively affects women's decision-making, which in turn negatively affects maternal BMI. The positive effect of work-free time on maternal BMI is suppressed by the negative effect of household land size on work-free time. Agriculture interventions must consider land quality, women's decision-making and implications for women's workload in their design
Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates: evidence on Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups in eastern India
BACKGROUND: Tribal peoples are among the most marginalised groups worldwide. Evidence on birth outcomes in these groups is scant. We describe inequalities in Stillbirth Rate (SBR), Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR), and uptake of maternal and newborn health services between tribal and less disadvantaged groups in eastern India, and examine the contribution of poverty and education to these inequalities. METHODS: We used data from a demographic surveillance system covering a 1Â million population in Jharkhand State (March 2017 - August 2019) to describe SBR, NMR, and service uptake. We used logistic regression analysis combined with Stata's adjrr-command to estimate absolute and relative inequalities by caste/tribe (comparing Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTG) and other Scheduled Tribes (ST) with the less marginalised Other Backward Class (OBC)/none, using the Indian government classification), and by maternal education and household wealth. RESULTS: PVTGs had a higher NMR (59/1000) than OBC/none (31/1000) (rate ratio (RR): 1.92, 95%CI: 1.55-2.38). This was partly explained by wealth and education, but inequalities remained large after adjustment (adjusted RR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.28-1.98). NMR was also higher among other STs (44/1000), but disparities were smaller (RR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.23-1.75). There was a systematic gradient in NMR by maternal education and household wealth. SBRs were only higher in poorer groups (RRpoorest vs. least poor:1.56, 95%CI: 1.14-2.13). Uptake of facility-based services was low among PVTGs (e.g. institutional birth: 25% vs. 69% in OBC/none) and among poorer and less educated women. However, 65% of PVTG women with an institutional birth used a maternity vehicle vs. 34% among OBC/none. Visits from frontline workers (Accredited Social Health Activists [ASHAs]) were similar across groups, and ASHA accompaniment of institutional births was similar across caste/tribe groups, and higher among poorer and less educated women. Attendance in participatory women's groups was similar across caste/tribe groups, and somewhat higher among richer and better educated women. CONCLUSIONS: PVTGs are highly disadvantaged in terms of birth outcomes. Targeted interventions that reduce geographical barriers to facility-based care and address root causes of high poverty and low education in PVTGs are a priority. For population-level impact, they are to be combined with broader policies to reduce socio-economic mortality inequalities. Community-based interventions reach disadvantaged groups and have potential to reduce the mortality gap
Institutional delivery in public and private sectors in South Asia: a comparative analysis of prospective data from four demographic surveillance sites
BACKGROUND: Maternity care in South Asia is available in both public and private sectors. Using data from demographic surveillance sites in Bangladesh, Nepal and rural and urban India, we aimed to compare institutional delivery rates and public-private share. METHODS: We used records of maternity care collected in socio-economically disadvantaged communities between 2005 and 2011. Institutional delivery was summarized by four potential determinants: household asset index, maternal schooling, maternal age, and parity. We developed logistic regression models for private sector institutional delivery with these as independent covariates. RESULTS: The data described 52 750 deliveries. Institutional delivery proportion varied and there were differences in public-private split. In Bangladesh and urban India, the proportion of deliveries in the private sector increased with wealth, maternal education, and age. The opposite was observed in rural India and Nepal. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of institutional delivery increased with economic status and education. The choice of sector is more complex and provision and perceived quality of public sector services is likely to play a role. Choices for safe maternity are influenced by accessibility, quantity and perceived quality of care. Along with data linkage between private and public sectors, increased regulation should be part of the development of the pluralistic healthcare systems that characterize south Asia
Economic evaluation of participatory women's groups scaled up by the public health system to improve birth outcomes in Jharkhand, eastern India
An estimated 2.4 million newborn infants died in 2020, 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. To achieve the Sustainable Development Target for neonatal mortality reduction, countries with high mortality need to implement evidence-based, cost-effective interventions at scale. Our study aimed to estimate the cost, cost-effectiveness, and benefit-cost ratio of a participatory women's groups intervention scaled up by the public health system in Jharkhand, eastern India. The intervention was evaluated through a pragmatic cluster non-randomised controlled trial in six districts. We estimated the cost of the intervention at scale from a provider perspective, with a 42-month time horizon for 20 districts. We estimated costs using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches. All costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted at 3% per year, and converted to 2020 International Dollars (INT 15,017,396. The intervention covered an estimated 1.6 million livebirths across 20 districts, translating to INT 1,272 per neonatal death averted or INT 1,046 million to INT$ 3,254 million, and benefit-cost ratios from 71 to 218. Our study suggests that participatory women's groups scaled up by the Indian public health system were highly cost-effective in improving neonatal survival and had a very favourable return on investment. The intervention can be scaled up in similar settings within India and other countries
Exploring the Equity Impact of a Maternal and Newborn Health Intervention: A Qualitative Study of Participatory Women's Groups in Rural South Asia and Africa
A consensus is developing on interventions to improve newborn survival, but little is known about how to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in newborn mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Participatory learning and action (PLA) through women's groups can improve newborn survival and home care practices equitably across socioeconomic strata, as shown in cluster randomised controlled trials. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms that led to the equitable impact of the PLA approach across socioeconomic strata in four trial sites in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Malawi
Eff ect of participatory women’s groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists on birth outcomes in rural eastern India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Background A quarter of the world’s neonatal deaths and 15% of maternal deaths happen in India. Few
community-based strategies to improve maternal and newborn health have been tested through the country’s
government-approved Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs). We aimed to test the eff ect of participatory
women’s groups facilitated by ASHAs on birth outcomes, including neonatal mortality.
Methods In this cluster-randomised controlled trial of a community intervention to improve maternal and newborn
health, we randomly assigned (1:1) geographical clusters in rural Jharkhand and Odisha, eastern India to intervention
(participatory women’s groups) or control (no women’s groups). Study participants were women of reproductive age
(15–49 years) who gave birth between Sept 1, 2009, and Dec 31, 2012. In the intervention group, ASHAs supported
women’s groups through a participatory learning and action meeting cycle. Groups discussed and prioritised maternal
and newborn health problems, identifi ed strategies to address them, implemented the strategies, and assessed their
progress. We identifi ed births, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths, and interviewed mothers 6 weeks after delivery. The
primary outcome was neonatal mortality over a 2 year follow up. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is
registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN31567106.
Findings Between September, 2009, and December, 2012, we randomly assigned 30 clusters (estimated population
156 519) to intervention (15 clusters, estimated population n=82 702) or control (15 clusters, n=73 817). During the
follow-up period (Jan 1, 2011, to Dec 31, 2012), we identifi ed 3700 births in the intervention group and 3519 in the
control group. One intervention cluster was lost to follow up. The neonatal mortality rate during this period was
30 per 1000 livebirths in the intervention group and 44 per 1000 livebirths in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0.69,
95% CI 0·53–0·89).
Interpretation ASHAs can successfully reduce neonatal mortality through participatory meetings with women’s groups.
This is a scalable community-based approach to improving neonatal survival in rural, underserved areas of India
Economic evaluation of participatory women's groups scaled up by the public health system to improve birth outcomes in Jharkhand, eastern India
An estimated 2.4 million newborn infants died in 2020, 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. To achieve the Sustainable Development Target for neonatal mortality reduction, countries with high mortality need to implement evidence-based, cost-effective interventions at scale. Our study aimed to estimate the cost, cost-effectiveness, and benefit-cost ratio of a participatory women's groups intervention scaled up by the public health system in Jharkhand, eastern India. The intervention was evaluated through a pragmatic cluster non-randomised controlled trial in six districts. We estimated the cost of the intervention at scale from a provider perspective, with a 42-month time horizon for 20 districts. We estimated costs using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches. All costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted at 3% per year, and converted to 2020 International Dollars (INT 15,017,396. The intervention covered an estimated 1.6 million livebirths across 20 districts, translating to INT 1,272 per neonatal death averted or INT 1,046 million to INT$ 3,254 million, and benefit-cost ratios from 71 to 218. Our study suggests that participatory women's groups scaled up by the Indian public health system were highly cost-effective in improving neonatal survival and had a very favourable return on investment. The intervention can be scaled up in similar settings within India and other countries.</p
Economic evaluation of nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions to increase maternal and child dietary diversity and nutritional status in rural Odisha, India
BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions are scarce, limiting assessment of their potential affordability and scalability. OBJECTIVE: We conducted cost-consequence analyses of three participatory video-based interventions of fortnightly women's group meetings using: 1) NSA videos; 2) NSA and nutrition-specific videos; or 3) NSA videos with a nutrition-specific Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) cycle. METHODS: Interventions were tested in a 32-month, four-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, UPAVAN, in Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Impacts were evaluated in children aged 0-23 months and their mothers. We estimated program costs using data collected prospectively from expenditure records of implementing and technical partners, and societal costs using expenditure assessment of households with a child aged 0-23 months and key informant interviews. Costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted, and converted to 2019 US. RESULTS: Total program costs of each intervention ranged from US272,121 to US386,907. Program costs per pregnant woman or mother of a child aged 0-23 months were US62 for NSA videos, US84 for NSA and nutrition-specific videos, and US78 for NSA videos with PLA (societal costs: US125, US143, and US122 respectively). Substantial shares of total costs constituted developing and delivering the videos and PLA (52-69%) and quality assurance (25-41%). Relative to control, children's minimum dietary diversity was higher in the intervention incorporating nutrition-specific videos (adjusted relative risk [95% CI] 1.19 [1.03, 1.37]) and PLA (1.27 [1.11, 1.46]). Relative to control, mothers' minimum dietary diversity was higher in NSA video (1.21 [1.01, 1.45]), and NSA with PLA (1.30 [1.10, 1.53]) interventions. CONCLUSION: NSA videos with PLA can increase both maternal and child dietary diversity and has the lowest cost per unit increase in diet diversity. Building on investments made in developing UPAVAN, cost-efficiency at scale could be increased with less intensive monitoring, reduced start-up costs, and integration within existing government programs.Trial registration: ISRCTN65922679
The Equity Impact of Community Women's Groups to Reduce Neonatal Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Four Cluster Randomized Trials
Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are substantial in many developing countries. Little is known about how to address this problem. Trials in Asia and Africa have shown strong impacts on neonatal mortality of a participatory learning and action intervention with women’s groups. Whether this intervention also reduces mortality inequalities remains unknown. We describe the equity impact of this women’s groups intervention on the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) across socioeconomic strata.
We conducted a meta-analysis of all four participatory women’s group interventions that were shown to be highly effective in cluster randomized trials in India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Malawi. We estimated intervention effects on NMR and health behaviours for lower and higher socioeconomic strata using random effects logistic regression analysis. Differences in effect between strata were tested.
Analysis of 69120 live births and 2505 neonatal deaths shows that the intervention strongly reduced the NMR in lower (50–63% reduction depending on the measure of socioeconomic position used) and higher (35–44%) socioeconomic strata. The intervention did not show evidence of ‘elite-capture’: among the most marginalized populations, the NMR in intervention areas was 63% lower [95% confidence interval (CI) 48–74%] than in control areas, compared with 35% (95% CI: 15–50%) lower among the less marginalized in the last trial year (P-value for difference between most/less marginalized: 0.009). The intervention strongly improved home care practices, with no systematic socioeconomic differences in effect.
Participatory women’s groups with high population coverage benefit the survival chances of newborns from all socioeconomic strata, and perhaps especially those born into the most deprived households
How to design a complex behaviour change intervention: experiences from a nutrition-sensitive agriculture trial in rural India.
Many public health interventions aim to promote healthful behaviours, with varying degrees of success. With a lack of existing empirical evidence on the optimal number or combination of behaviours to promote to achieve a given health outcome, a key challenge in intervention design lies in deciding what behaviours to prioritise, and how best to promote them. We describe how key behaviours were selected and promoted within a multisectoral nutrition-sensitive agriculture intervention that aimed to address maternal and child undernutrition in rural India. First, we formulated a Theory of Change, which outlined our hypothesised impact pathways. To do this, we used the following inputs: existing conceptual frameworks, published empirical evidence, a feasibility study, formative research and the intervention team's local knowledge. Then, we selected specific behaviours to address within each impact pathway, based on our formative research, behaviour change models, local knowledge and community feedback. As the intervention progressed, we mapped each of the behaviours against our impact pathways and the transtheoretical model of behaviour change, to monitor the balance of behaviours across pathways and along stages of behaviour change. By collectively agreeing on definitions of complex concepts and hypothesised impact pathways, implementing partners were able to communicate clearly between each other and with intervention participants. Our intervention was iteratively informed by continuous review, by monitoring implementation against targets and by integrating community feedback. Impact and process evaluations will reveal whether these approaches are effective for improving maternal and child nutrition, and what the effects are on each hypothesised impact pathway