Comparing overall survival and long-term effects of R-CHOP and R-CHOEP for the treatment of younger patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R-CHOP vs R-CHOEP).

This study seeks to investigate if outcomes differ between DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP and R-CHOEP, where treatments groups are matched based upon patients characteristics. Main objective: To investigate and contrast the restricted mean survival for overall survival and progression free survival between DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOEP compared to R-CHOP. Secondary objectives: To compare and contrast: 1) Duration of complete remission 2) Hospitalization days due to any cause in the first 365 days after starting therapy. 3) Incidence rates and cumulative incidence of first occurrence of CVD and secondary malignancies 4) Risk of relapse among patients in first CR after primary-treatmen

Work Disability and Return to Work After Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE: Most adult patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are below retirement age. The overall survival of patients with ALL has improved with implementation of high intensity pediatric-inspired treatment protocols. However, this treatment comes with a risk of long-term complications, which could affect the ability to work. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of disability pension (DP) and return to work (RTW) for patients with ALL.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-60 years diagnosed with ALL between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the Danish National Acute Leukemia Registry. Each patient was matched with five comparators from the general population on birth year, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to calculate the cumulative risk of DP for patients and comparators from index date (defined as 1 year after diagnosis) with competing events (transplantation or relapse, death, retirement pension, or early retirement pension). Differences in cumulative incidences were calculated using Gray's test. RTW was calculated as proportions one, three, and five years after the index date for patients holding a job before diagnosis.RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with ALL and 770 matched comparators were included. The 5-year cumulative risk of DP was increased fivefold for patients with ALL compared with the general population. RTW was 41.7%, 65.7%, and 60.7% one, three, and five years after the index date, respectively.CONCLUSION: The risk of DP in patients with ALL increased significantly compared with the general population. Five years after the index date, RTW was 60.7% for patients with ALL.</p

MRD-driven treatment with venetoclax-R2 in mantle cell lymphoma: the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL7 VALERIA trial

Despite improvements in treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), most patients eventually relapse. In this multicenter phase 1b/2 trial, we evaluated safety and efficacy of minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven venetoclax, lenalidomide, and rituximab (venetoclax-R2) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL and explored the feasibility of stopping treatment in molecular remission. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) at 6 months. After dose escalation, the recommended phase 2 dose was lenalidomide 20 mg daily, days 1 to 21; venetoclax 600 mg daily after ramp-up; and rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, then every 8 weeks. MRD monitoring by RQ-PCR was performed every 3 months. When MRD-negativity in the blood was reached, treatment was continued for another 3 months; if MRD-negativity was then confirmed, treatment was stopped. In total, 59 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 73 years. At 6 months, the ORR was 63% (29 complete remission [CR], 8 partial remission [PR]), and 40% (4 CR, 2 PR) for patients previously failing a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, with median overall survival of 31 months. TP53 mutation was associated with inferior PFS (P &lt; .01). Overall, 28 patients (48%) discontinued treatment in molecular remission, and 25 remain MRD negative after a median of 17.4 months. Hematological toxicity was frequent, with 52 of 59 (88%) patients with G3-4 neutropenia and 21 of 59 (36%) patients with G3-4 thrombocytopenia. To conclude, MRD-driven venetoclax-R2 is feasible and tolerable and shows efficacy in R/R MCL, also after BTK inhibitor failure. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03505944.</p

Machine Learning-Based Survival Prediction Models for Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Purpose: Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (aHL) have historically been risk-stratified using the International Prognostic Score (IPS). This study investigated if a machine learning (ML) approach could outperform existing models when it comes to predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Patients and methods: This study used patient data from the Danish National Lymphoma Register for model development (development cohort). The ML model was developed using stacking, which combines several predictive survival models (Cox proportional hazard, flexible parametric model, IPS, principal component, penalized regression) into a single model, and was compared with two versions of IPS (IPS-3 and IPS-7) and the newly developed aHL international prognostic index (A-HIPI). Internal model validation was performed using nested cross-validation, and external validation was performed using patient data from the Swedish Lymphoma Register and Cancer Registry of Norway (validation cohort).Results: In total, 707 and 760 patients with aHL were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Examining model performance for OS in the development cohort, the concordance index (C-index) for the ML model, IPS-7, IPS-3, and A-HIPI was found to be 0.789, 0.608, 0.650, and 0.768, respectively. The corresponding estimates in the validation cohort were 0.749, 0.700, 0.663, and 0.741. For PFS, the ML model achieved the highest C-index in both cohorts (0.665 in the development cohort and 0.691 in the validation cohort). The time-varying AUCs for both the ML model and the A-HIPI were consistently higher in both cohorts compared with the IPS models within the first 5 years after diagnosis.Conclusion: The new prognostic model for aHL on the basis of ML techniques demonstrated a substantial improvement compared with the IPS models, but yielded a limited improvement in predictive performance compared with the A-HIPI