2 research outputs found
Methane and CO<sub>2</sub> Adsorption Capacities of Kerogen in the Eagle Ford Shale from Molecular Simulation
ConspectusOver the past decade, the United States has
become a world leader
in natural gas production, thanks in part to a large-fold increase
in recovery from unconventional resources, i.e., shale rock and tight
oil reservoirs. In an attempt to help mitigate climate change, these
depleted formations are being considered for their long-term CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential. Because of the variability in mineral
and structural composition from one formation to the next (even within
the same region), it is imperative to understand the adsorption behavior
of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in the context of specific conditions
and pore surface chemistry, i.e., relative total organic content (TOC),
clay, and surface functionality.This study examines two Eagle
Ford shale samples, both recovered
from shale that was extracted at depths of approximately 3800 m and
having low clay content (i.e., less than 5%) and similar mineral compositions
but distinct TOCs (i.e., 2% and 5%, respectively). Experimentally
validated models of kerogen were used to the estimate CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities. The pore size distributions
modeled were derived from low-pressure adsorption isotherm data using
CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> as probe gases for micropores and
mesopores, respectively. Given the presence of water in these natural
systems, the role of surface chemistry on modeled kerogen pore surfaces
was investigated. Several functional groups associated with surface-dissociated
water were considered. Pressure conditions from 10 to 50 bar were
investigated using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations along with
typical outgassing temperatures used in many shale characterization
and adsorption studies (i.e., 60 and 250 °C). Both CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> were used as probe gases to determine the total
pore volume available for gas adsorption spanning pore diameters ranging
from 0.3 to 30 nm. The impacts of surface chemistry, outgassing temperature,
and the inclusion of nanopores with diameters of less than 1.5 nm
were determined for applications of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> storage from samples of the gas-producing region of the Eagle Ford
Shale. At 50 bar and temperatures of 60 and 250 °C, CH<sub>4</sub> adsorption increased across all surface chemistries considered by
60% and 2-fold, respectively. In the case of CO<sub>2</sub>, the surface
chemistry played a role at both 10 and 50 bar. For instance, at temperatures
of 60 and 250 °C, CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption increased across
all surface chemistries by 6-fold and just over 2-fold, respectively.
It was also found that at both 10 and 50 bar, if too low an outgassing
temperature is used, this may lead to a 2-fold underestimation of
gas in place. Finally, neglecting to include pores with diameters
of less than 1.5 nm has the potential to underestimate pore volume
by up to 28%. Taking into consideration these aspects of kerogen and
shale characterization in general will lead to improvements in estimating
the CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of gas shales
Selection of Shale Preparation Protocol and Outgas Procedures for Applications in Low-Pressure Analysis
The low-pressure
gas adsorption (LPGA) method for estimation of
pore capacities, pore size distributions, and total surface area using
adsorption–desorption isotherms is selected as an effective
technique in pore characterization. A recent application of this method
is to understand the complex and heterogeneous nature of shales across
the globe. The LPGA experiments were conducted on shale samples from
Barnett and Eagle Ford formations in the United States using CO<sub>2</sub> for micropores of 0.3–1.5 nm in diameter and N<sub>2</sub> and Ar as the adsorbates to focus on micropores from 1.5
to 2.0 nm and the lower range of mesopores above 2.0–27 nm
in diameter. It was hypothesized that a significant error in estimations
could occur due to inconsistencies in the shale outgas temperatures.
It was observed that lower pore capacities result from lower outgas
temperatures, and higher pore capacities result from increasing outgas
temperatures. It is hypothesized that lower outgas temperatures fail
to completely eliminate adsorbed moisture and adsorbed low-molecular
weight hydrocarbon species from shale pores, which leaves the pores
partially filled and as such result in lower values of pore capacity.
By increasing the outgassing temperature, the adsorbed species in
the pores are completely removed, yielding higher pore capacities.
The cutoff temperature of 250 °C during outgassing for regeneration
of “clean” shale pores was arrived at by analyzing the
LPGA results of samples without any outgassing and samples outgassed
at 60, 110, and 250 °C. The 250 °C maximum outgas temperature
is intended to maximize the results of LPGA while minimizing structural
changes to shales. Mass stabilization as shown by thermogravimetric
analysis and magnetic suspension balance measurements support the
assertion that the shale is not fundamentally altered by processes
such as kerogen cracking until a temperature higher than 250 °C
is reached. The kerogen had approximately 3.0% weight loss at 110
°C, with an additional 1.3% loss between 110 and 250 °C.
Likewise, the desorption experiments carried out on clay at 110 °C
were approximately 1.3%, with an additional 0.5% loss between 110
and 250 °C. On the basis of the interpretation of pore size distributions
using the LPGA method, it was concluded that accurate shale characterization
is achieved when the analysis is limited to results from relative
pressures (<i>P</i>/<i>P</i><sub>o</sub>) less
than or equal to 0.90. At higher relative pressures, the sizes of
the adsorbate-occupied pores cannot be distinguished