3 research outputs found
Abrupt versus Gradual Spin-Crossover in Fe<sup>II</sup>(phen)<sub>2</sub>(NCS)<sub>2</sub> and Fe<sup>III</sup>(dedtc)<sub>3</sub> Compared by X‑ray Absorption and Emission Spectroscopy and Quantum-Chemical Calculations
Molecular spin-crossover (SCO) compounds
are attractive for information storage and photovoltaic technologies.
We compared two prototypic SCO compounds with Fe<sup>II</sup>N<sub>6</sub> (<b>1</b>, [FeÂ(phen)<sub>2</sub>(NCS)<sub>2</sub>],
with phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) or Fe<sup>III</sup>S<sub>6</sub> (<b>2</b>, [FeÂ(dedtc)<sub>3</sub>], with dedtc = <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′-diethyldithiocarbamate) centers, which
show abrupt (<b>1</b>) or gradual (<b>2</b>) thermally
induced SCO, using K-edge X-ray absorption and Kβ emission spectroscopy
(XAS/XES) in a 8–315 K temperature range, single-crystal X-ray
diffraction (XRD), and density functional theory (DFT). Core-to-valence
and valence-to-core electronic transitions in the XAS/XES spectra
and bond lengths change from XRD provided benchmark data, verifying
the adequacy of the TPSSh/TZVP DFT approach for the description of
low-spin (LS) and high-spin (HS) species. Determination of the spin
densities, charge distributions, bonding descriptors, and valence-level
configurations, as well as similar experimental and calculated enthalpy
changes (Δ<i>H</i>), suggested that the varying metal–ligand
bonding properties and deviating electronic structures converge to
similar enthalpic contributions to the free-energy change (Δ<i>G</i>) and thus presumably are not decisive for the differing
SCO behavior of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>. Rather, SCO seems
to be governed by vibrational contributions to the entropy changes
(Δ<i>S</i>) in both complexes. Intra- and intermolecular
interactions in crystals of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> were
identified by atoms-in-molecules analysis. Thermal excitation of individual
dedtc ligand vibrations accompanies the gradual SCO in <b>2</b>. In contrast, extensive inter- and intramolecular phen/NCS vibrational
mode coupling may be an important factor in the cooperative SCO behavior
of <b>1</b>
Protonation and Sulfido versus Oxo Ligation Changes at the Molybdenum Cofactor in Xanthine Dehydrogenase (XDH) Variants Studied by X‑ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Enzymes
of the xanthine oxidase family are among the best characterized mononuclear
molybdenum enzymes. Open questions about their mechanism of transfer
of an oxygen atom to the substrate remain. The enzymes share a molybdenum
cofactor (Moco) with the metal ion binding a molybdopterin (MPT) molecule
via its dithiolene function and terminal sulfur and oxygen groups.
For xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) from the bacterium <i>Rhodobacter
capsulatus</i>, we used X-ray absorption spectroscopy to determine
the Mo site structure, its changes in a pH range of 5–10, and
the influence of amino acids (Glu730 and Gln179) close to Moco in
wild-type (WT), Q179A, and E730A variants, complemented by enzyme
kinetics and quantum chemical studies. Oxidized WT and Q179A revealed
a similar MoÂ(VI) ion with each one MPT, Moî—»O, Mo–O<sup>–</sup>, and Moî—»S ligand, and a weak Mo–OÂ(E730)
bond at alkaline pH. Protonation of an oxo to a hydroxo (OH) ligand
(p<i>K</i> ∼ 6.8) causes inhibition of XDH at acidic
pH, whereas deprotonated xanthine (p<i>K</i> ∼ 8.8)
is an inhibitor at alkaline pH. A similar acidic p<i>K</i> for the WT and Q179A variants, as well as the metrical parameters
of the Mo site and density functional theory calculations, suggested
protonation at the equatorial oxo group. The sulfido was replaced
with an oxo ligand in the inactive E730A variant, further showing
another oxo and one Mo–OH ligand at Mo, which are independent
of pH. Our findings suggest a reaction mechanism for XDH in which
an initial oxo rather than a hydroxo group and the sulfido ligand
are essential for xanthine oxidation
Sulfido and Cysteine Ligation Changes at the Molybdenum Cofactor during Substrate Conversion by Formate Dehydrogenase (FDH) from Rhodobacter capsulatus
Formate
dehydrogenase (FDH) enzymes are attractive catalysts for
potential carbon dioxide conversion applications. The FDH from Rhodobacter capsulatus (<i>Rc</i>FDH) binds
a bis-molybdopterin-guanine-dinucleotide (bis-MGD) cofactor, facilitating
reversible formate (HCOO<sup>–</sup>) to CO<sub>2</sub> oxidation.
We characterized the molecular structure of the active site of wildtype <i>Rc</i>FDH and protein variants using X-ray absorption spectroscopy
(XAS) at the Mo K-edge. This approach has revealed concomitant binding
of a sulfido ligand (Mo=S) and a conserved cysteine residue (SÂ(Cys386))
to MoÂ(VI) in the active oxidized molybdenum cofactor (Moco), retention
of such a coordination motif at MoÂ(V) in a chemically reduced enzyme,
and replacement of only the SÂ(Cys386) ligand by an oxygen of formate
upon MoÂ(IV) formation. The lack of a Mo=S bond in <i>Rc</i>FDH expressed in the absence of FdsC implies specific metal sulfuration
by this bis-MGD binding chaperone. This process still functioned in
the Cys386Ser variant, showing no Mo–SÂ(Cys386) ligand, but
retaining a Mo=S bond. The C386S variant and the protein expressed
without FdsC were inactive in formate oxidation, supporting that both
Mo–ligands are essential for catalysis. Low-pH inhibition of <i>Rc</i>FDH was attributed to protonation at the conserved His387,
supported by the enhanced activity of the His387Met variant at low
pH, whereas inactive cofactor species showed sulfido-to-oxo group
exchange at the Mo ion. Our results support that the sulfido and SÂ(Cys386)
ligands at Mo and a hydrogen-bonded network including His387 are crucial
for positioning, deprotonation, and oxidation of formate during the
reaction cycle of <i>Rc</i>FDH